On Sun, 6 Sep 2009 18:53:37 +0100 Graham Percival <gra...@percival-music.ca> wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 06, 2009 at 12:23:28PM +0200, Grammostola Rosea wrote: > > @ Valentin, yeah would be nice if we could improve the midi output by > > default. I can remember I mentioned this before, but one comment (not > > from you) was that Lilypond was mainly a notation typesetter... And > > while been busy with the lilywrap script, I was thinking, ok maybe > > that's right, but what is wrong with having both, e.g. good lay-out and > > good midi output? > > Of course there's nothing wrong with having both! However, nobody > else wants to work on midi output. Again, why not get in touch with the developer(s) of midge? The syntax is completely different, but it is *text-based* and GNU. It is dedicated to midi, not notation. Why not find a way to use their work, at worst by means of a translation script? Regards, daveA _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
