Great. Thanks. I knew connectArpeggios could connect across staves but
not across voices.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Sun, Jul 6, 2014 at 6:52 AM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2014-07-06 15:35 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum :
> > I have a chord that's arpeggiated but the top note is in another voice.
>
2014-07-06 15:35 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum :
> I have a chord that's arpeggiated but the top note is in another voice. I
> want the arpeggio indicator to go from the chord in one voice to the note in
> another. So far what I have is this, but the note stem goes up to the
> moving voice. Is there a
2014-07-06 15:35 GMT+02:00 Knute Snortum :
> I have a chord that's arpeggiated but the top note is in another voice. I
> want the arpeggio indicator to go from the chord in one voice to the note
> in another. So far what I have is this, but the note stem goes up to the
> moving voice. Is there
I have a chord that's arpeggiated but the top note is in another voice. I
want the arpeggio indicator to go from the chord in one voice to the note
in another. So far what I have is this, but the note stem goes up to the
moving voice. Is there a way to lengthen the arpeggio indicator or remove
2010/7/27 Nick Payne :
> The following doesn't add the arrow to the arpeggio. Can it be done?
>
> \version "2.13.28"
>
> \new Staff \with {
> \consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"
> }
> \relative c' {
> \set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
> <<
> \arpeggioArrowUp
> { 4\arpeggio 2 } \\
> { 2\
The following doesn't add the arrow to the arpeggio. Can it be done?
\version "2.13.28"
\new Staff \with {
\consists "Span_arpeggio_engraver"
}
\relative c' {
\set Staff.connectArpeggios = ##t
<<
\arpeggioArrowUp
{ 4\arpeggio 2 } \\
{ 2\arpeggio 2 }
>>
}
Nick
<>
Thanks. That fixes the problem.
Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: Robin Bannister [mailto:r...@dataway.ch]
> Sent: Saturday, 28 March 2009 01:31
> To: Nick Payne; lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with arpeggio across voices and fingering
>
> Nick Payne w
Nick Payne wrote:
What I want is the fingering just to the left of the notes
and the arpeggio just to the left of the fingering.
I'm pretty sure you ought to change the order in which
these things are hung onto the side of the notes.
But I'm afraid I can't help you with that.
As regards ho
Hi Mats,
In this bug database you can also see that this is one of 258 open
issues. :-(
I'd love to see Coda Music's "open issues" file for Finale... ;-)
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/li
to be related to having the arpeggio across voices, as if
I remove only the arpeggio against the part of the chord in voiceFour, then
the gap disappears, though I still have the arpeggio appearing to the right
of the fingering rather than to t
ather ugly looking gap
between the preceding element in the score and this one.
The problem seems to be related to having the arpeggio across voices, as if
I remove only the arpeggio against the part of the chord in voiceFour, then
the gap disappears, though I still have the arpeggio appearing to the ri
Thanks for that. It looks great! Just one little question. Do you know
why I'm still getting this error?:
programming error: no heads for arpeggio found?
continuing, cross fingers
I even get this in the example your provided. I can live with this
though. I just try to minimize these warnings/err
By default, LilyPond will only connect arpeggios between different staves,
but that's easy to fix, just add the corresponding engraver to the Staff
context
(see the example below). Also, you have to specify the \arpeggio in all
the voices,
otherwise there is no other arpeggio to connect to. The
Here's what I have right now:
%\set PianoStaff.connectArpeggios = ##t %this is close but not quite
<< {ees4( d8 ees4 des8)} \\ {4.\arpeggio \arpeggio} >>
I want these arepeggi to go from the e flat down to the g flat. It is
a piano piece, but the connectArpeggios didn't quite do it as I don't
wa
14 matches
Mail list logo
