Re: 2.5.9 not on Fink

2005-02-18 Thread Graham Percival
On 18-Feb-05, at 2:06 AM, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote: I'm confused. what's this http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2005-01/msg00249.html about thhen? It's an experimental package source that should only be used by experienced unix people. It's not available in fink stable or fink unstab

Re: 2.5.9 not on Fink

2005-02-18 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > However, the web site _should_ say 2.5.0, not 2.5.9. I've fixed this. > > Kieren, you may find the experimental CVS to be of interest, and bug > reports > about it would be great, but for production use definitely stay with I'm confused. what's this http://lists.g

Re: 2.5.9 not on Fink

2005-02-17 Thread Graham Percival
However, the web site _should_ say 2.5.0, not 2.5.9. I've fixed this. Kieren, you may find the experimental CVS to be of interest, and bug reports about it would be great, but for production use definitely stay with 2.4.2. - Graham On 17-Feb-05, at 12:52 PM, Mats Bengtsson wrote: See http://li

Re: 2.5.9 not on Fink

2005-02-17 Thread Mats Bengtsson
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2005-02/msg00262.html /Mats Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote: Hello, all! Finally back (after a long hiatus from beyond-the-Pond), and fink updated my unstable install. But the version now listed is 2.5.0, not 2.5.9 as indicated on the website

2.5.9 not on Fink

2005-02-17 Thread Kieren Richard MacMillan
Hello, all! Finally back (after a long hiatus from beyond-the-Pond), and fink updated my unstable install. But the version now listed is 2.5.0, not 2.5.9 as indicated on the website -- is that expected? Thanks, Kieren. ___ lilypond-user mailing list l