On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:58 AM, Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:03:58 -0700
> "Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You do raise a lot of interesting points though. I'm not the best
>> person to address these concerns though.
>
> No he doesn't. At le
Graham Percival wrote Wednesday, August 06, 2008 7:58 AM
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:03:58 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You do raise a lot of interesting points though. I'm not the best
person to address these concerns though.
No he doesn't. At least, he hasn't raised any n
On Tue, 5 Aug 2008 17:03:58 -0700
"Patrick McCarty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You do raise a lot of interesting points though. I'm not the best
> person to address these concerns though.
No he doesn't. At least, he hasn't raised any new points, nor
anything that we haven't considered.
2.12
On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 4:05 PM, Steve Dunlop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> You don't get it. If you have an archive like Mutopia, where there are
> thousands of files and dozens of contributors, and mixed dependencies on
> versions, running conver-ly doesn't work.
>
> It doesn't work because two
> This has been discussed numerous times on the mailing list. Check the
> archives.
>
> Handling syntax changes such as \compressMusic --> \scaleDurations are
> easily handled by convert-ly, since there is no change in structure of
> the input file. Simply use
eaven's sake leave the old syntax alone so that
> existing files will still compile.
>
>
This has been discussed numerous times on the mailing list. Check the archives.
Handling syntax changes such as \compressMusic --> \scaleDurations are
easily handled by convert-ly, since the
You have absolutely no idea how much chaos things like this cause for
people who are using Lilypond for major projects. You have absolutely
no idea how much of a problem this sort of thing is for archives like
Mutopia. You have no idea how the lack of input grammar stability
undermines efforts
omas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hi Kieren, with the help of the german sidux-forum I succeded with:
> > find . -iname '*.ly' -exec perl -pi -e
> > 's/compressMusic/scaleDurations/g' {} \;
> > Hope it can help other users.
> >
>
x27;*.ly' -exec perl -pi -e
> 's/compressMusic/scaleDurations/g' {} \;
> Hope it can help other users.
>
> 2008/6/29 Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> > Hi Stefan,
> >
> >
> > I don't know, what could be wrong with this
Stefan Thomas wrote:
> Hi Kieren, with the help of the german sidux-forum I succeded with:
> find . -iname '*.ly' -exec perl -pi -e
> 's/compressMusic/scaleDurations/g' {} \;
> Hope it can help other users.
Why don't you simply use convert-ly?
Hi Kieren, with the help of the german sidux-forum I succeded with:
find . -iname '*.ly' -exec perl -pi -e 's/compressMusic/scaleDurations/g' {}
\;
Hope it can help other users.
2008/6/29 Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Stefan,
>
>
> I don
Hi Stefan,
I don't know, what could be wrong with this snippet:
\version "2.11.49"
\relative { \compressMusic #' (1 . 2 ) {c4 c g' g a a g2 } }
Is it a bug of the version 2.11.49?
In the NEWS section, you'll see that \compressMusic has been renamed
\sca
Dear Lilypondusers,
I don't know, what could be wrong with this snippet:
\version "2.11.49"
\relative { \compressMusic #' (1 . 2 ) {c4 c g' g a a g2 } }
Is it a bug of the version 2.11.49?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
l
Very sorry, checked again, I forgot {}
-a-
\new Staff {
\time 3/4
\set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = #'(9 . 8)
\compressMusic #'(2 . 3)
\repeat unfold 3 { c8[ c c] }
| c4. c4. c4. | c
x27;es the code:
\version "2.6.4"
\relative c' { <<
\new Staff {
\time 3/4
c4 c c | c c c | c c c |
}
\new Staff {
\time 3/4
\set Staff.timeSignatureFraction = #'(9 . 8)
\compressMusic #'(2 .
I've done a slight modification of the documentation, to appear in the
next 2.7.x version. It reads:
... The latter is done with
`\compressMusic', which is used similar to `\times', but does not
create a tuplet bracket. The syntax is
\compressMusic #'(NUMERATOR . DENOMINATOR)
Thank you once again Mats...
Does this ever come up enough to be documented somwhere??
Trent
- Original Message -
From: "Mats Bengtsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Trent Johnston" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2005 9:31 PM
Subject: Re:
y... Looks like the grace note
> problem with beginning a
> score with a tuplet is also a problem with using
> \compressMusic
>
> I've put in the blank grace notes in the other parts
> but it doesn't seem to
> help..
grace note problem with beginning a
score with a tuplet is also a problem with using \compressMusic
I've put in the blank grace notes in the other parts but it doesn't seem to
help..
Any help or hints appreciated ye
Yes it's me again...
Still find this tricky... Looks like the grace note problem with beginning a
score with a tuplet is also a problem with using \compressMusic
I've put in the blank grace notes in the other parts but it doesn't seem to
help..
Any help or hints apprec
Thanks Mats...
I re-read the section about this and found that the only reference to \times
was
"The latter is done with \compressMusic, which is similar to \times, but
does not create a tuplet bracket."
To me this doesn't describe very accurately that you use \compressMusic
21 matches
Mail list logo