On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 17:40, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 11:16, Bryan, Chris wrote:
> > > Is it possible to do feathered beams in LY? If so, how?
> >
> > there is no native mechanism for this. i hacked it a while ago by making
> > two simultaneou
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 17:40, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 11:16, Bryan, Chris wrote:
> > > Is it possible to do feathered beams in LY? If so, how?
> >
> > there is no native mechanism for this. i hacked it a while ago by making
> > two simultaneou
On Mon, 2004-06-14 at 11:16, Bryan, Chris wrote:
> Is it possible to do feathered beams in LY? If so, how?
there is no native mechanism for this. i hacked it a while ago by making
two simultaneous beamed note-groups, with the beams tilted opposite
directions in each, and tweaked so the beam star
greetings!
this was asked back in sept 2002 and was never answered the issue
still exists:
pagenumber = no
also turns off the "head" field in \header
is this intentional?
more to the point, is there a way of turning of the page number on ONLY
the first page, WITHOUT losing any other headers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
with this score in EMACS:
\score {
\notes { f16 g a b c[ < d f >]
}
\paper {}
}
EMACS claims that the closing parenthesis of the \notes block is
mismatched, and if i put in a second line of notes it wants to indent to
the < of the first line.
if i move the ] insid
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there any plan to support tremolos shorter than a quarter?
i.e. \repeat "tremolo" 2 { c32 e32 }
i've had occasion to need them, but they generate a warning and end up
looking like squished-together quarter tremolos with no beam between t
wondering if there's a way to break a beam at a barline which has a time
sig change, so the beam doesn't clash with the time sig. i still want
the visual sense of beaming over the barline, so want to end up with
"hanging" partial beams on either side, just like when you break a beam
over a line
is there any plan to support tremolos shorter than a quarter?
i.e. \repeat "tremolo" 2 { c32 e32 }
i've had occasion to need them, but they generate a warning and end up
looking like squished-together quarter tremolos with no beam between the
stems. i'll have to hack a beam somehow for now.
i need to make some "accelerando beams" - you know, the ones in modern
notation with two beams starting close together and getting gradually
further apart towards the end of the beamed group of notes. afaik, this
is not currently supported in lilypond.
i'm thinking of making this by having two
ion is described, for example, in
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=paper+sizes+tabloid&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&selm=1995Jun8.104533.18767%40sei.cmu.edu&rnum=1
What do you think, should we rename 'ledger' to 'tabloid' or change
the definitions in ledger
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
See 1.9 CVS:
* Quarter tones are now supported. They are entered by suffixing
`ih' for a half-sharp and `eh' for a half-flat. Hence, the
following is an ascending list of pitches:
ceses ceseh ces ceh c cih cis cisih cisis
excellent... thankyou! i
thanks, stefaan, for your example of correct implementation of
allowBeamBreak --- it is a great relief to have this functioning.
now i am wondering if there is any way to make the broken beam follow
the angle it would have taken if unbroken (other than manually tweaking
them). i have a sequence
regression | beaming.ly states "Beams may cross bar lines. In that case,
line breaks are forbidden."
sorry. i was attempting incorrect implementation of "allowBeamBreak".
thanks to stefaan himpe for his example of implementation in the thread
"line break problem" from mid-august!
i'll mo
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
My real problem is: where does it end? We can add quarter tone
accidentals by doubling the alteration field,
we now have
0 = natural,
1 = sharp
2 = double sharp.
We could do
0 = natural
1 = 1/2 sharp
2 = sharp
3 = 3/4 sharp
4
sorry to bother the list with this i found how to do it.
-p
Peter Lutek wrote:
greetings!
in a piece of music using follow-voice between staves, is it possible
to make SOME of the follow-voice lines transparent or non-existant?
(i'm referring to the straight lines which connect the
greetings!
in a piece of music using follow-voice between staves, is it possible to
make SOME of the follow-voice lines transparent or non-existant? (i'm
referring to the straight lines which connect the notes on one staff to
the following notes on the other staff)
thanks!
-p
_
f=one { \skip 1 R1 }
\context Staff=two {\clef tenor d4 e f g f e d c }
\context Staff=three {\clef bass R1 \skip 1 }
>
\paper{
raggedright = ##t
}
}
perhaps there are some gremlins hiding in this scheme, which will bite
me at some point but for now it looks plausible. comment
is it possible to implement voice-following lines in scores with more
than two staves? the documentation only refers to piano staff contexts.
-p
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
stave to fool LilyPond into displaying all staves on the first system.
(You can search the mailing list archive for "invisible note" if you
don't know how to do it.)
/Mats
Peter Lutek wrote:
greetings!
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext works well to remove staves in a large score
on p
does anyone have a method for makeing dashed or dotted hairpins? (v1.8.0)
thanks!
-p
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
greetings!
\RemoveEmptyStaffContext works well to remove staves in a large score on
pages where they only contain rests, but i am wondering if there is a
mechanism for displaying ALL staves on the FIRST page of the score,
whether empty or not.
thanks!
-p
___
greetings!
on my installation of lilypond (1.8.0 on RedHat9), if i attempt to use
papersize = "legal" or papersize = "ledger", i get an ly2dvi warning
saying "legal" or "ledger" is an invalid value. "letter", "a3", and "a4"
are all ok.
ledger-init.ly , legal-init.ly , a3-init.ly , a4-init.ly ,
thanks, patrick... that works well.
one can set the clef to transparent
what if it's only one staff in a multi-staff system?
i'm wondering how to hide a clef.
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/mail
what if it's only one staff in a multi-staff system?
-p
Patrick Atamaniuk wrote:
try to put that in your \paper section:
\translator {
\StaffContext
\remove "Clef_engraver"
}
regards,
/p
Peter Lutek([EMAIL PROTECTED])@2003.08.26 12:40:35 +:
i'm wondering how to hide a clef.
i.e. i wish to have notes on a staff, using treble clef note positions,
but with no clef showing on the staff.
i don't see how to do this in the manual. is it possible?
thanks!
-p
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[E
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
window which usually tells you either that the package has installed
successfully or that some dependencies have not been met, etc.
since my last message, i have finally been successful in getting
lilypond 1.8.0-1 running on RedHat 9, as foll
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, how does one run lilypond on RH9, without compiling from source? i
have tried to install guile-1.6.4-7.1.i386.rpm (from the rawhide rpm dir
at ftp.redhat.com) which is linked
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, how does one run lilypond on RH9, without compiling from source? i
have tried to install guile-1.6.4-7.1.i386.rpm (from the rawhide rpm dir
at ftp.redhat.com) which is linked on the lilypond download page, but
the rpm installation routine
quoting from an archived post:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I can confirm that Guile 1.6.0 contains the srfi library and
> works well with Lilypond 1.8. I downloaded the Guile 1.6.0
> tar ball and compiled it myself with the standard configuration,
> so I can't say if RedHat or some
29 matches
Mail list logo
