perfect thanks!
Mar 6, 2024, 14:35 by lilyp...@hillvisions.com:
> On 2024-03-06 10:56 am, Michael Winter via LilyPond user discussion wrote:
>
>> I have a programmatically generated score and am now realizing that I want
>> to make a small tweak to text markups that are throu
double thanks
Mar 6, 2024, 14:36 by j...@abou-samra.fr:
>
> Try
>
> \version "2.24.2"\paper { #(add-text-replacements!'(("1↑" . "1")))}{
> c'^\markup "1↑" }
>
> Best,
>
>
> Jean
>
>
haracters, or are you
> trying to replace larger chunks of LilyPond code?
>
> It would also help to know what operating system environment you are
> using. The answer may be to make a copy of the whole tree and run a
> search/replace utility recursively on all the files.
>
> Regards
I have a programmatically generated score and am now realizing that I want to
make a small tweak to text markups that are throughout the score in multiple
files that are included at multiple levels.
" 1↑" replace with " 1" (e.g. remove the up arrow when it is preceded by a 1)
Is it possible t
This is what happens for me too. I think it has something to do with all the
other functions I am using.
Oct 30, 2023, 21:25 by l...@gmx.de:
>
> Hi Michael,
>
> Am 30.10.23 um 10:42 schrieb Michael Winter:
>
>> But I am confused about what you said. For
Thanks!
This seems to work quite well : )
But I am confused about what you said. For me, it is posting the accidental on
tied notes after line breaks.
Best,
Michael
Oct 28, 2023, 22:40 by l...@gmx.de:
> Hi Michael,
>
>> Thanks Lukas!
>>
>> This works but also forces the accidental on tied no
erty! event 'force-accidental #t))
>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \Voice
> \consists #Force_accidentals_engraver
> }
> }
>
> \transpose a c' \relative
> {
> a8 gis g fis g gis a4
> }
>
>
>
> Lukas
>
> Am 21.10.23 um 11:3
Thanks Jean,
I am not sure I completely follow.
Lets say I have a music sequence:
a b c d e f g a bes c d e f g ...
How do I apply what you have written as a function to only show the flats and
naturals for b and bes. Again. I do not want to apply this to individual notes.
Sorry if I am missi
I have a piece that is in the following scale:
c d e fis g aes bes b
Is it possible to force the accidentals just for the bes and the b?
But here is the catch...
I am both transposing the part and respelling pitch-classes as show below. The
scale above is actually the resulting printed set of n
-ref scaleA pos))
> (oct2 (ly:pitch-octave p2))
> (p3 (list-ref scaleB pos))
> (new-pitch (ly:pitch-transpose p3 (ly:make-pitch (-
> oct oct2) 0
> (ly:music-set-property! m 'pitch new-pitch)))
> m)
> #f)))
> music)
> music))
>
> \transposePitchClas
single Staff or Voice. At the moment, the replacement
> dictionary is global, but this could be changed if needed.
>
> At the moment the mechanism I chose is too crude to do replacements that
> involve changing the pitch-octave (eg from c to b,). Do you need this?
>
> Lu
I am now realizing that it would be useful to have this both at the level of
the entire score and individually for each part.
Aug 31, 2023, 12:53 by mwin...@unboundedpress.org:
> I would like to do something (hopefully simple), which is basically a custom
> find and replace for a set of notes i
I would like to do something (hopefully simple), which is basically a custom
find and replace for a set of notes in an entire score.
For example {c cis d dis fih g aih} -> {c cis dih dis f gis a}
So basically on arbitrary list of pitches / scale to another.
Is this possible without writing a c
Thanks all,
Seems like there are many solutions. Also know I understand the problem so will
be able to look for such things in the future.
Best,
Michael
Jun 4, 2020, 04:20 by r...@dabble.ch:
> Michael Winter wrote:
>
> It seems that when a notehead is merged in two voices no matter
It seems that when a notehead is merged in two voices no matter what you do
you, lilypond only adds on lv tie. Is there a way to force 2 lv ties?
<<{ d,4\laissezVibrer ^ \markup{ 0.0 } } \new Voice { \voiceTwo
d,4\laissezVibrer }>>
Thanks in advance.
-Michael
On cursory glance this looks like a viable solution. Perhaps I can tweak it to
people to use it at the end of a system as opposed to the beginning of a
system. That would make my life a bit easier but not completely necessary.
Jun 2, 2020, 09:31 by r...@dabble.ch:
> Michael Winter wr
> \repeat unfold 20 s1
> }
>
> \layout {
> system-count = 8
> }
>
> Otherwise you can do two single scores.
> HTH, cheers,
> Pierre
>
> PS. > http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
>
> Le mar. 2 juin 2020 à 13:23, Michael Winter <> mwin...@unbo
,
Michael
Jun 2, 2020, 24:48 by pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com:
> Hi Michael,
> try:
>
> ragged-last = ##t
>
> Cheers
> Pierre
>
> Le mar. 2 juin 2020 à 06:13, Michael Winter via LilyPond user discussion <>
> lilypond-user@gnu.org> > a écrit :
>
>&g
Hello,
Is it possible to have ragged-right = ##f but then allow a single system to be
ragged-right after a forced \break or \pageBreak?
Any help on how to do this will be much appreciated.
Thanks in advance.
Michael
Thanks,
I did try that directive, but it seems to not keep my proportional notation.
Is that by design?
-Michael
On 8/23/18 6:22 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
Michael Winter writes:
Hello,
Is it possible to start engraving at a specified measure or to omit
the first x measure.
Note that I am
Hello,
Is it possible to start engraving at a specified measure or to omit the
first x measure.
Note that I am not trying to create a fragment here. I just want to drop
x given empty measures at the beginning of a particular staff (without
removing empty staves past a certain point).
I tri
.
Now I will try to alter the gradients.
On 01/31/2018 06:35 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-02-01 1:28 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
2018-01-31 19:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
I am now curious what you are thinking about the line breaking. Maybe I am
out to lunch here and you have a much better idea
Thanks. You have gone far and above the call of duty. I will post
questions if I have any, but wont shed tears if you cannot get around to it.
Best,
Michael
On 01/31/2018 06:28 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-01-31 19:02 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
I am now curious what you are thinking
just want everything to align / be accurate to start.
Best,
Michael
On 01/31/2018 06:15 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-01-31 18:37 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
As for linebreaking. That is indeed a showstopper at the moment. Is that
because you are using filled box stencil?
No, I was not cl
almost. something seems to be not quite right about the alignment...
On 01/31/2018 03:30 PM, Michael Winter wrote:
ok. I have learned a tremendous amount with your help. I went ahead
and hacked away replacing your function with line markups and now it
seems to work with line breaks. let me
o
b'8
}
\new Score
<<
\new Staff \mus
\new Staff {
%% negative value reverses colors
\override Glissando.details.color-steps = -100
%% thicker
\override Glissando.thickness = 2
\mus
}
\new Staff {
%% less steps, default (and max) is 100
\override Glissando.details.col
nter wrote:
Hmmm... I made the change to use the stencil extent and that seems to
be fine. I am not sure what you are saying about the visibility of the
final stencil.
As for linebreaking. That is indeed a showstopper at the moment. Is
that because you are using filled box stencil? When I was usin
path
directive with a line, the breaking seemed to work / break fine. I will
see if I can make the switch unless you have another idea.
Best,
Michael
On 01/31/2018 03:41 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-01-31 3:46 GMT+01:00 Michael Winter :
On first glance. This looks ideal. THANK YOU
I am a bit
On first glance. This looks ideal. THANK YOU
I am a bit brain dead at the moment, so will dig in tomorrow and let you
know if I have any further questions / thoughts / ideas.
Very kind indeed.
Best,
Michael
On 01/30/2018 07:35 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-01-31 0:00 GMT+01:00 Michael
s '(0 0))
b'16 b'16 b'8 b'4 \override Staff.Beam.color =
#(x11-color 'grey60) b'8 b'16 b'16 ~ \once \override
NoteColumn.glissando-skip = ##t b'16 b'16 b'8
}}
>>
>>
On 01/30/2018 03:32 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
201
Hello...
I have tried quite a few hacks, but nothing really suitable.
What I really want is to simple draw a line beneath the staff that has a
grey scale gradient such that for each note, I give a target value.
Most of what I have tried involves doing this in increments with
overlapping span
\path #2
#'((moveto 0.6 0)
(lineto 0.9 0)
(closepath))
}
}
On 01/29/2018 06:27 PM, Michael Winter wrote:
Hello...
I have tried quite a few hacks, but nothing really suitable.
What I really want is to simple draw a line beneath the staff that has
a grey scale gradient such that for
04:28 PM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-09-08 18:13 GMT+02:00 Michael Winter :
>> Respectfully,
>>
>> This is like someone asking for directions but instead of getting an
>> answer on how to get to their preferred destination, getting asked why
>> they would want to go
I think I found a good solution. This needs some more testing, but here
goes (see below). This with the overridden auto-knee-gap and damping
settings allows some dampening but will always clear one of the beam
sides out of the staff. So looks like all is accomplished: generally
getting the beams ou
Thank you David!
This is so, so helpful. You have no idea how grateful I am. I want to
play around a bit and will let you know if I have any further questions.
Best,
Michael
On 09/08/2016 11:13 AM, David Nalesnik wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:08 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>> So, to ge
Thank you David!
This is a great start. And at the very least gets me to the point where
manual overrides will not be as numerous.
I also think I can play with this to get a bit more natural dampening.
Plus this is a good opportunity to get my feet wet with scheme.
Quick thought (to maybe deal w
,
Michael
On 09/08/2016 02:10 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2016-09-08 8:52 GMT+02:00 Michael Winter :
>> Is it possible to force a beam to always start (vertically) a minimum
>> distance from the staff regardless of the stem direction?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Michael
ques Menu Muzhic wrote:
> Hello Michael,
>
> Can you show an example of what you’d like to get?
>
> JM
>
>> Le 8 sept. 2016 à 08:52, Michael Winter a écrit
>> :
>>
>> Is it possible to force a beam to always start (vertical
, but I would
need to know which direction the stems are going. Is it possible to get
that value so I can set the beam position negative or positive based on
the direction of the stem?
On 09/07/2016 11:52 PM, Michael Winter wrote:
> Is it possible to force a beam to always start (vertically) a mini
Is it possible to force a beam to always start (vertically) a minimum
distance from the staff regardless of the stem direction?
Thanks,
Michael
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi All,
I am bumping this issue as I am working with Casey and we really need a
solution for this problem. Any help will be much appreciated. Again, it
seems like there is no way to:
force center (vertically) the rests in the staff such that the bea
notation that gives you exact horizontal spacing by
> eliminating all traditionally placed accidentals and places them over the
> notes instead.
>
> or something,
> Jeff
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 12:57 PM, Michael Winter
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>&
#x27;16 ais'16 e''16 g16 ais''16 a''16 ais16 e16 d''16 a''16 c16
ais'16 e''16 a''16 ais'16 e''16 g'16 c''16 d''16 a''16 a'16
}
}
On Feb 7, 2013, at 4:23 AM, li
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> On 07/02/13 07:57, Michael Winter wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> I have a piano staff that is using \autochange. The notes are just running
>> 16ths throughout. In a beamed group, sometimes the notes a
Dear All,
It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not allow
collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any collision
such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? Or maybe I am
missing something
Many thanks in advance,
Mike
Dear All,
I have a piano staff that is using \autochange. The notes are just running
16ths throughout. In a beamed group, sometimes the notes are all in the upper
staff, sometimes they are all in the lower staff, and sometimes they are in
both. What I really want to do is force the beam to be f
Dear All,
It seems that with proportional notation even strict spanning does not allow
collisions of notehead and accidentals. Is it possible to allow any collision
such that the resolution and accuracy are exact no matter what? Or maybe I am
missing something
Many thanks in advance,
Mike
Dear All,
I have a piano staff that is using \autochange. The notes are just running
16ths throughout. In a beamed group, sometimes the notes are all in the upper
staff, sometimes they are all in the lower staff, and sometimes they are in
both. What I really want to do is force the beam to be f
48 matches
Mail list logo
