On 2021-05-22 14:51, Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote:
Hi Kaj,
Am 22.05.21 um 14:25 schrieb Kaj Persson:
How surprising! I tried using Devnull for a piece, but the lyrics did
not synchronize with the music. So I discovered that it ignores ties
and slurs. This makes this finesse useless for lyrics
, but it could be useful also for the lyrics.
/Kaj
Here is an example:
\version "2.22.0"
preMusic = \relative { a2 a }
voltaMusic = \relative { b'4 b~ b b }
finalMusic = \relative { c''4 c( c) c }
preTxt = \lyricmode { Pre text }
voltaOne = \lyricmode { The first tim
I can sleep soundly the whole night, and wake up in a
fresh mode tomorrow and take care of the job with "my" piece of music.
Thank you Carl!
/Kaj
On 2021-05-18 20:39, Carl Sorensen wrote:
Kaj,
This is how I approach your problem. It uses Devnull contexts to space the
lyrics, and
Hello David and Aaron
You'll find my message at the bottom ...
On 2021-05-16 23:41, David Wright wrote:
On Sun 16 May 2021 at 06:07:22 (+0200), Kaj Persson wrote:
[ … ] I think I have read most of the
relevant parts in Notation manual and also Learning manual, but,
according to what
2021-05-15 20:31 skrev David Wright:
On Sat 15 May 2021 at 16:03:54 (+0200), Kaj Persson wrote:
In the Notation manual is described how to manage Lyrics in Repeat
conditions. It shows examples the Repeat section following an initial
part of music. There are also examples when the Repeat
he interested can also test removing the "% " before the \lyricsto to
see the consequence.
I am running LilyPond version 2.21.0 via Frescobaldi. Appended an image
of the Music example.
Kaj P
\version "2.22.0"
ta = \lyricmode {
% Not re -- peat -- ed.
a a a a }
tb = \lyricmode
human voices and not
the orchestra members, but I have chosen to keep the those in the
example in the manual, just adding the letters A and B to indicate the
position in the music.
I am sorry this message became rather long, but I could not make it
shorter still describing the problem and my
.
\version "2.18.2"
\relative f'{
f8_\markup { \translate #'(0.8 . 0) F}
}
Kaj
Hello. Can you explain the meaning of this:
f8_\markup - start the markup below the note f8
{
\translate -- call "translate" function
#' - what's this?
(0.8 . 0) - param
Ivanov!
I understand that you want a function which puts your text exact at the
midpoint between the notes, but...
Else is the simplest to just displace your text some distance. But of
course, then you have to calculate the midpoint yourself.
\version "2.18.2"
\relative f'{
David,
On 2017-03-27 at 20:17, David Kastrup wrote:
Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes:
So the result you show printed is _exactly_ the result according to
my explanation, yet you say it isn't, possibly because of glossing
over half of the explanation, possibly
Den 2017-03-27 kl. 18:53, skrev David Kastrup:
Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes:
On 2017-03-27 at. 17:54, David Kastrup wrote:
Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes:
Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced
the code with the HTML t
On 2017-03-27 at. 17:54, David Kastrup wrote:
Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes:
Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced
the code with the HTML tags ... , a methode I have been
using several times before, with good results. Well I take your words
On 2017-03-27 at. 17:54, David Kastrup wrote:
Kaj Persson <70147pers...@telia.com> writes:
Oh sorry, this was not according to my intention. And yet I embraced
the code with the HTML tags ... , a methode I have been
using several times before, with good results. Well I take your words
\new Voice { \voiceTwo \Mk }
}
>>
}
\layout {}
% \midi {}
}
Two images attached:
Layout_of_tag-quoteDuring.png
Midi_of_tag-quoteDuring.png
For the preamble, see the original post (also cited below).
/Kaj
On 2017-03-27 at 14:33, David Kastrup wrote:
>
fined in? Some kind of variable? In the "Notation Reference" there
is no hint of having to change the code when you move an engraver to a
new context. Well I do not know Scheme (yet), and do not see that an
ordinary user should have to (even if I can imagine it might raise the
understanding a wee).
Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
pets/contexts-and-engravers#contexts-and-engravers-using-marklines-in-a-frenched-score
I used
\set MarkLine.rehearsalMark = #6
in that case.
Toine
Well, thank you for help. Step by step one learns how to come around the
pecularities...
Kaj
___
lilypond
en this variable setting in the
Internal Reference manual, but it was noted "(read)" so i did not test it.
However, this must be a work around for a bug, isn't it? It should work
without it, shouldn't it?
Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
y staff or even group of staves.
And still, I cannot understand why I have to do so, and what is
happening when I put a name on one of the voices, as it works without
this name.
/Kaj
Den 2016-05-30 15:37, skrev Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hi Kaj,
if you use separate templates for pdf and midi, of
remains however, if the first attempt with the dynamics as
a separate voice is working for the printed score, why does not this
information go into the MIDI file, when any of the voices is named.
/Kaj
Den 2016-05-30 10:34, skrev Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hi Kaj,
perhaps it doesn't matter that its
nswer, the developers had snapped the problem and put the solution into
the \new Dynamics concept.
/Kaj
On 2016-05-30 10:38, Phil Holmes wrote:
Have you tried \new Dynamics { \Dynamics } instead of \new Voice ?
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
*From:* 70147pers...@telia.com &l
On 2015-09-19 05:06, Brett Duncan wrote:
On 19/09/15 8:49 AM, Kaj Persson wrote:
As you wrote Csus ought to mean that the first third is removed, and
nothing else. Among professional musicians, which I am not, but I
have friends who are, this is not the whole truth, there exists a de
facto
, not trying to
introduce something else (more "clever"). Therefore it would be fine if
one could adapt LP to the current situation.
/Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Den 2015-09-17 11:33, skrev Thomas Morley:
2015-09-17 11:13 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
Thomas Morley writes:
2015-09-17 10:47 GMT+02:00 Simon Albrecht :
Hello Kaj,
On 17.09.2015 09:27, 70147pers...@telia.com wrote:
First I will declare, that I am not 100 percent sure this is a bug, but
Hi Noeck
Sorry for a late answer. I have been away from home and not being able
to read my e-mail.
On 2015-05-23 20:41, Noeck wrote:
Hi Kaj,
in general you are right: In case there is only one expression,
duplicating the 'brackets', << >> or { } is not needed. You c
On 2015-05-21 15:30, tisimst wrote:
Kaj,
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Kaj [via Lilypond] <[hidden email]
> wrote:
I am working on a piece of choir music. It consists of two parts,
the first of which is written on one staff, and the second two
staves. The upper staff i
Hello everybody,
I have a piece of music for three choir voices (Soprano Alto Baritone).
It is written almost solely as chords with one, two or three voices.
With one voice, everybody is singing that one, with two the sopranos
sing the "top" notes and the others sing the lower voice. My wish i
ct by just copying from your sheet. Now I can say "of course", but I
did not realize this. Your explanation has opened my eyes, and I have
come a few steps further towards the true understanding. Thank you!
Kaj
On 2015-03-12 01:31, Noeck wrote:
Dear Kaj,
you are brave to really dig t
tested this.
Best regards
Kaj
Den 2015-02-21 14:04, skrev Noeck:
Hi Kaj, hi Lilypond users,
I also would like to say that again that spacing is a bit daunting. But I hope
with the help you got here, it is possible to adjust the spacing you need. The
deeper understanding will come with time and it
Thanks Trevor!
So this with stretching demands to be the next thing to put your teeth into.
/Kaj
Den 2015-02-21 23:15, skrev Trevor Daniels:
Kaj wrote Saturday, February 21, 2015 9:10 PM
One thing (among others) I still do not understand: why are there three
keys describing the distance
but those are for the experts, who
already know how it works. The novice does not understand, since the
description contains holes, where info is lacking or implied.
Kaj
Den 2015-02-21 22:27, skrev Kieren MacMillan:
Hi Kaj (et al.),
if I understand it correct, the effective (resulting) dis
give a definite answer. So I do not see
the reason. Historical maybe?
Kaj
Den 2015-02-21 14:04, skrev Noeck:
Hi Kaj, hi Lilypond users,
I also would like to say that again that spacing is a bit daunting. But I hope
with the help you got here, it is possible to adjust the spacing you need. The
insight. Of course this accompanied with studying the different
manuals available.
Thank you very much for your assistance on my wobbly learning path.
Kaj
Den 2015-02-20 02:27, skrev Paul Morris:
Hi Kaj,
In my experience adjusting vertical spacing in LilyPond can be particularly
complicated and
e means of VerticalAxisGroup while StaffGrouper is the
one which actually should do that job. Yes, I know that you tried to
give an explanation, but, sorry to say, it was much above my head.
Nevertheless, thank you very much for your try.
Kaj
On 2015-02-19 19:12, Noeck wrote:
Hi Kaj,
These t
ssibility
will be closed in the future, when someone has corrected the error.
So well, possibly even you have realised something. Thank you for
showing me the right way...!
/Kaj
Den 2015-02-19 14:21, skrev Noeck:
Hi Kaj,
I don't understand this part:
But obviously VerticalAxisGroup
Hello Joram!
Sorry for misspelling your name! I saw it first when the e-mail slipped
away. /Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
me a good deal.
Kaj
Den 2015-02-19 12:39, skrev Noeck:
Hi Kaj,
these spacing settings are very flexible but also quite complicated. The manual
indeed explains this. But I try to make it easier for your case. This works for
me:
\version "2.18.2"
\layout {
indent = #0
ragged-rig
" did
work as intended. So there must be something I have missed. Yes, I
admit, I do no quite understand the short explanation in the manual.
So thank you all: Joram, Simon and Stephen for your valuable help.
Kaj
On 2015-02-18 15:49, Kaj wrote:
Sorry, the code example became totally distor
s did not succeed for me. I did also test the modern way of
writing with dots between the keywords, but with no effect.
Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
erride Staff.VerticalAxisGroup #'staff-staff-spacing
#'basic-distance = #15 |
but this did not succeed for me. I did also test the modern way of
writing with dots between the keywords, but with no effect.
Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Wow!
That was a solution! Should never had found it myself, and, to be
honest, do not understand it neither. Not yet, but I will try to. And
obviously it works.
So Klaus, danke schön!
Den 2015-02-06 15:22, skrev Klaus Blum:
Hello Kaj,
you can put an empty measure in between and interrupt
is written.
/Kaj
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Thank you David!
Yes, this solved my problem, and I am satisfied. It works fine also with
four staves Choir staff which I will use it for.
/Kaj
Den 2015-02-04 02:50, skrev David Nalesnik:
Hi,
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 4:35 PM, David Nalesnik
mailto:david.nales...@gmail.com>> wrote:
In the snippet collection, the "Repeats" section, there is one named
"Shortening volta brackets". I have use for just this, since in a piece
of music I need some extra space in order to put a mark immediately
after the volta alternative bracket. So I tested it, and, yes, the
example promised we
43 matches
Mail list logo
