Hello everybody,
The legal subtleties of public licensing never made their way into my mind,
sorry for being limited…
What would the difference be, should openLilyLib use LGPL instead of GPL?
JM
> Le 22 sept. 2020 à 02:34, Andrew Bernard a écrit :
>
> Karsten, despite your lengthy discourse
Karsten, despite your lengthy discourse on licensing, I am sure you
have the wrong end of the stick here. Your unique interpretation of
GPL in relation to lilypond is not shared by anybody as far as I know.
Users are happily producing scores and works not subject to having to
provide source code. I
Kenneth,
Use _._> after each pitch.
Mark
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of Kenneth Wolcott
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2020 1:46 PM
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: How do I engrave this articulation? a not
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 4:00 PM Karsten Reincke wrote
>
> We had this discussion a year ago and I won't repeat the details. The
> last time it ended in a kind of unfruitful shitstorm which did not help
> anyone. But if you now look for supporters, you have to see that your
> license model reduce
Dear Urs;
I gratefully appreciate your work on LilyPond. Because of your friendly
and affectionate way of sharing your knowledge in this mailing list - as
I was allowed to experience it in the past - I also want to believe that
OpenLilylib is valuable. Personally, I refrained from familiarizin
Thanks, so obvious, yet I didn't see it. Awesome!
On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 2:00 PM Pierre Perol-Schneider
wrote:
>
> HI Ken,
> Try:
>
> \version "2.20.0"
> \fixed c' {
> e4-1-.-> c'-5-. d-1-.-> b-4-.
> }
>
> Cheers,
> PIerre
>
> Le lun. 21 sept. 2020 à 22:46, Kenneth Wolcott a
> écrit :
>>
>>
HI Ken,
Try:
\version "2.20.0"
\fixed c' {
e4-1-.-> c'-5-. d-1-.-> b-4-.
}
Cheers,
PIerre
Le lun. 21 sept. 2020 à 22:46, Kenneth Wolcott a
écrit :
> Hi;
>
> c-. and c-> Lilypond articulation engravings I understand, but I
> don't understand how to put a dot underneath the note and then a r
You just write both of them, like
c-.->
(Or is that for some reason not working?)
> 21 sep. 2020 kl. 22:45 skrev Kenneth Wolcott :
>
> Hi;
>
> c-. and c-> Lilypond articulation engravings I understand, but I
> don't understand how to put a dot underneath the note and then a right
> angle brack
\version "2.22.0"
\score{
c'4\staccato \accent
}
On 9/21/20, 2:46 PM, "lilypond-user on behalf of Kenneth Wolcott"
wrote:
Hi;
c-. and c-> Lilypond articulation engravings I understand, but I
don't understand how to put a dot underneath the note and then a right
angle bracket under the
Hi;
c-. and c-> Lilypond articulation engravings I understand, but I
don't understand how to put a dot underneath the note and then a right
angle bracket under the dot.
See attached screen shot.
Thanks,
Ken
Am Mo., 21. Sept. 2020 um 15:55 Uhr schrieb Leo Correia de Verdier
:
>
> I have the following situation:
>
> \version "2.20.0"
> \new StaffGroup
> << \new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #2/3 }
>{c''1 \bar "|."}
>\new Staff
>{c'1 \bar "|.”} >>
>
> Where the bars on the different sized stave
Hi all,
to begin with, I am of the (biased) opinion that openLilyLib is a
powerful and useful extension infrastructure for LilyPond. There are a
number of versatile and extended ready-to-use packages available, most
notably probably edition-engraver, scholarLY and anaLYsis. But also the
underlying
I have the following situation:
\version "2.20.0"
\new StaffGroup
<< \new Staff \with { \magnifyStaff #2/3 }
{c''1 \bar "|."}
\new Staff
{c'1 \bar "|.”} >>
Where the bars on the different sized staves have different thicknesses
according to their staff size. How would be the best way to
On 2020-09-20 9:52 pm, Andrew Bernard wrote:
Using LSR 891 as a base pattern, how can you fill the path with a
colour, such as white?
ly:stencil-in-color and ly:stencil-add should help:
\version "2.18.2"
tri =
#(let ((coords '((-0.5 0) (0 -1) (0.5 0)))
(thick 0.1) (scale-x 1) (sca
14 matches
Mail list logo