> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, January 12, 2020 6:04 PM
> To: Daniel Rosen
> Cc: David Nalesnik ; lilypond-user Mailing List
> (lilypond-user@gnu.org)
> Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment
>
> Though, I've already heard abou
From: Paolo Prete
Date: Sunday, January 12, 2020 at 7:31 PM
To: Aaron Hill
Cc: lilypond-user
Subject: Re: Shift up OttavaBracket
As said in the first post staff-padding seems to have the same problem of
Y-offset:
http://lilybin.com/njdr3x/1
outside-staff-padding does the job only if reset;
Hi Kieren,
look at my last post. Repositioning the OttavaBracket requires an unknown
offset.
best,
Paolo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 2:26 AM kieren_macmillan kieren_macmillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
>
> > Unfortunately, with extra-offset I have the disadvantage that all
>
>
>
> outside-staff-padding does the job only if reset; see:
>
> http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/4
>
>
> Wrong link. Look at:
>>
>
http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/5
As said in the first post staff-padding seems to have the same problem of
Y-offset:
http://lilybin.com/njdr3x/1
outside-staff-padding does the job only if reset; see:
http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/4
Then I would consider this a bug. At least one property of OttavaBracket
should behave like extra-of
On 2020-01-12 5:17 pm, Paolo Prete wrote:
Unfortunately, with extra-offset I have the disadvantage that all the
other
objects are not moved automatically (smart repositioning)
True, extra-offset is the tool for making changes to the layout after
everything else has been done. It sounded like
Hi Paolo,
> Unfortunately, with extra-offset I have the disadvantage that all the other
> objects are not moved automatically (smart repositioning)
Do you want to increase padding?
e.g., http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/4
> Does my example show a bug/missing feature for OttavaBracket?
To be honest, it
Unfortunately, with extra-offset I have the disadvantage that all the other
objects are not moved automatically (smart repositioning)
Does my example show a bug/missing feature for OttavaBracket?
Thanks,
Paolo
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 1:56 AM Aaron Hill wrote:
> If you want to move the bracket u
If you want to move the bracket upwards based on its final position
after accounting for other objects such as the slur, then extra-offset
seems the way to go.
Otherwise, you can manually do the work that \offset Y-offset would have
done if you need to use 2.18.2.
\version "2.18.2"
test
Thanks David,
just tested that even with unstable it has some issues
http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/3
Is there a fix for this?
(I suppose that it could be fixed with outside-staff-priority, but I wonder
if is there a better fix)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:34 AM David Nalesnik
wrote:
> Hi Paolo,
Hi Paolo,
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:27 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> Try this with both stable and unstable
>
> http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/1
>
> On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:20 AM David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:13 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
>> >
>> > Thanks very much David.
>> > J
Try this with both stable and unstable
http://lilybin.com/yb5u35/1
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:20 AM David Nalesnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:13 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> >
> > Thanks very much David.
> > Just tested and it works with 2.19 (not with 2.18, though)
> >
>
> What did you wri
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 5:13 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> Thanks very much David.
> Just tested and it works with 2.19 (not with 2.18, though)
>
What did you write and what was the log output?
Thanks very much David.
Just tested and it works with 2.19 (not with 2.18, though)
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 12:06 AM David Nalesnik
wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:54 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
> >
> > Hello.
> >
> > Please consider this example:
> >
> > {{ \ottava #1 c c c c \otta
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 4:54 PM Paolo Prete wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> Please consider this example:
>
> {{ \ottava #1 c c c c \ottava #0 }}
>
> How can I shift up the ottava bracket exactly TWO staff spaces above its
> calculated position?
>
> Both:
> \override Staff.OttavaBracket.Y-o
Hi Daniel,
you may have heard there's a conference soon in Salzburg.
I will have a talk there as well, thus I doubt I can't look into the
problem you've reported before I'm back.
Nevertheless in alzburg I'll talk about user-defined extensions for LilyPond.
During the talk I'll frequently recommen
Hello.
Please consider this example:
{{ \ottava #1 c c c c \ottava #0 }}
How can I shift up the ottava bracket exactly TWO staff spaces above its
calculated position?
Both:
\override Staff.OttavaBracket.Y-offset = ... and \override
Staff.OttavaBracket.staff-padding = ... don't
Not exactly what you asked for, but I think this looks better and is
less confusing:
{\clef alto \tupletDown \tuplet 3/2 {a8-3( g-2 f-1)}}
---
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 9:14 AM Jean-Julien Fleck
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I've got into a strange behavior of a \tuplet that can
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Morley [mailto:thomasmorle...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2020 5:37 PM
> To: David Nalesnik
> Cc: Daniel Rosen ; lilypond-user Mailing List (lilypond-
> u...@gnu.org)
> Subject: Re: metronome-mark-alignment
>
> Am Sa., 11. Jan. 2020 um 18:
Hello Jacques,
> I’m no graphics specialist, but maybe inserting the attached image into the
> poster would make the role of Frescobaldi even clearer?
At the very least, we should dedicate some portion of this week’s conference to
rigorous testing of what’s represented in the image… ;)
Cheers
Hello,
I've got into a strange behavior of a \tuplet that can be seen with this
code:
{\clef alto \tuplet 3/2 {a8-3( g-2 f-1)}}
to be compared with the same without the slur
{\clef alto \tuplet 3/2 {a8-3 g-2 f-1}}
for which there is no collision between fingering and tuplet number.
In my litt
My message finally did go through after a while longer, so all is now well.
Apologies for the the noise.
> > I'm still trying to figure out how to create a custom notehead
> > (extended black rectangle)
>
> Something like this might be a good place to start:
>
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> {
>\tweak Stem.transparent ##t
>\tweak stencil #(lambda (grob)
> (grob-interpret-markup grob #{
>
Am 12. Januar 2020 12:43:04 MEZ schrieb Klaus Blum :
>Hi Urs, hi Jan-Peter,
>
>thanks for your feedback.
>
>Am 12.01.2020 um 09:59 schrieb Urs Liska:
>> I can't really imagine how the font sizes will turn out on a real A0
>> poster, but I assume you have thought about that (or used tested
>> tem
Hi Urs, hi Jan-Peter,
thanks for your feedback.
Am 12.01.2020 um 09:59 schrieb Urs Liska:
I can't really imagine how the font sizes will turn out on a real A0
poster, but I assume you have thought about that (or used tested
templates).
Honestly, I have no experience about that. I blindly trus
Hello,
I tried posting (a new thread) to the lilypond-devel list a couple of hours
ago, but it doesn't seem to have got through; at least my message is not
showing up in the archives. I'm already subscribed to the list - is there
something else I should be doing?
Thanks,
David
Hi Klaus,
this poster looks appealing and complete. The only comment I'd like to
give is what Urs already mentioned. Du you think the font-sizes are big
enough for A0 paper?
Jan-Peter
Am 12.01.20 um 00:54 schrieb Klaus Blum:
> Hi Jan-Peter, hi Werner,
>
> in cooperation with Urs Liska and Joram
Hi Guy,
thanks for reporting, registered as
https://github.com/frescobaldi/frescobaldi/issues/1247
The music view has undergone *substantial* modifications, actually
Wilbert has completely rewritten the code, which already shows great
improvements in functionality and carries even further potent
Hi Klaus,
Am Sonntag, den 12.01.2020, 00:54 +0100 schrieb Klaus Blum:
> Hi Jan-Peter, hi Werner,
>
> in cooperation with Urs Liska and Joram Berger,
Really? I can't recall any substantial contributions to that
> I have made a Poster
> about integrating LilyPond fragments into LibreOffice docum
29 matches
Mail list logo
