> [...] I generally understand "padding" as the amount of whitespace
> that should be reserved between objects. I never even noticed that
> property since in my mind I was looking for something that could in
> no way have something to do with it. Anyways, it's not the first
> time I find some o
Hi Stefano,
There are many threads in the archives about this inconsistency with text
spanners. It's very confusing for users, nad ends up wasting lots of time.
It would be great if this could be unified with the 'shorten' commands of
other objects, but I realise the developers are hugely constrai
Hi Harm, honestly because I generally understand "padding" as the amount of
whitespace that should be reserved between objects. I never even noticed
that property since in my mind I was looking for something that could in no
way have something to do with it. Anyways, it's not the first time I find
Am Di., 7. Mai 2019 um 00:23 Uhr schrieb Stefano Troncaro
:
>
> Hi Rick,
>
> Thank you for your answer. I didn't know that 'bound-details had an X
> property. It does what I need but it can get tedious to use because I need to
> specify a number from the start of the spanner (or the system if the
Hi Rick,
Thank you for your answer. I didn't know that 'bound-details had an X
property. It does what I need but it can get tedious to use because I need
to specify a number from the start of the spanner (or the system if the
spanner is broken into many systems). It takes some trial and error to f
Stefano,
Have you tried bound-details? I use this for glissandi, and it works well.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/internals/textspanner
Rick
From: lilypond-user on
behalf of Stefano Troncaro
Sent: Monday, May 6, 2019 11:50 AM
To: lilypond-user Mail
Hello again everyone,
I was expecting to be able to use shorten-pair for this in the same way
that is used with Hairpins, but it doesn't seem to work and I can't seem to
find what property I need to tweak.
Any pointers?
Thanks for your help,
Stéfano
___
Gianmaria Lari wrote:
If I'm not wrong to generate the two variables (myMusic and myFing) from
the previous code should not be that difficult.
1 I duplicate the music expression
2 In the variable where I want to put the music I remove the fingering
3 In the variable where I want to put the fin
Dear Robin you wrote:
> [...] You should limit lilypond to one staff by saying
> \new Staff << \myMusic \myFing >>
>
>
> That looks better, but it is still not equivalent.
> Try changing the s-2 to s_2:
> the notehead and the fingering collide.
> To avoid that you should also limit lilypond t
I found some solution that I post here to get some feedback and/or other
suggestions.
Here they are 4 different ways to add fingering to a musical expression:
*1 Standard:*
\version "2.21.0"
\fixed c' {a-1 c' f'-\finger\markup\circle 3 a'-4}
*2 Different context *(thanks Pierre Perol-Schneider
Gianmaria Lari wrote:
But when I finished to enter the fingering, I would definitely prefer
having the fingering instruction separated by the music. Something like
this (NB: it does not work correctly but I hope the idea is clear):
\version "2.21.0"
myMusic = {a4 b c' d'}
myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3
Let me first read through
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/documentation-work
just for me to imagine what this might mean for me. I'll come back to
you afterwards.
Regards
Stephan
Am 04.05.2019 um 23:58 schrieb Carl Sorensen:
>
>
> On 5/4/19, 2:51 PM, "mu...@gmx.ch" wrote
Ciao Stephane!
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 11:23, Stephan Schöll wrote:
> Despite of my newbie status on the list, let me ask back:
>
> What's your intention with separating dynamics, the notes and the
> fingerings?
>
> If the separation is only for displaying purposes in a specific staff, I
> would s
On Mon, 6 May 2019 at 11:16, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Gianmaria,
> I suppose you'll have to create/modify your own contect, say
> 'Fingerings, such as :
>
> \version "2.21.0"
> myMusic = {a4 b c' d'}
> myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3 s-4}
> <<
>
Despite of my newbie status on the list, let me ask back:
What's your intention with separating dynamics, the notes and the
fingerings?
If the separation is only for displaying purposes in a specific staff, I
would simply remove the corresponding engravers from the voice
\remove "Dynamic_en
Hi Gianmaria,
I suppose you'll have to create/modify your own contect, say
'Fingerings, such as :
\version "2.21.0"
myMusic = {a4 b c' d'}
myFing = {s4-1 s-2 s-3 s-4}
<<
\new Staff \myMusic
\new Dynamics \with { \consists Fingering_engraver } \myFing
>>
See:
http://l
Am Mo., 6. Mai 2019 um 03:56 Uhr schrieb Davide Liessi
:
>
> Dear all,
>
> in the following example I expected to see two identical scores, but
> in the first one the full bar rests after the rehearsal mark are not
> compressed.
>
> \version "2.19.82"
>
> \score {
> \compressMMRests
> \new Staf
I normally enter fingering instruction using the "note-digit" convention (
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.18/Documentation/notation/inside-the-staff#fingering-instructions)
like this:
\version "2.21.0"
{a4-1 b-2 c'-3 d'-4}
This way of proceeding it's in my opinion the easiest and less error prone
be
18 matches
Mail list logo
