Here's an error that has suddenly arisen in my score. I have no idea what
the cause is.
Frescobaldi output:
Starting lilypond 2.19.82 [piece-90-101.ly]...
Processing `/home/andro/work/lilypond/sq1/piece-90-101.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...[8]
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Interpreting
Happy 2019
My workflow is the good old "write first on paper and then use lilypond".
Many times i have to figure out how to expand lilypond to notate something
different or outside traditional notation (thanks to anyone that helped me
before). Often I write a very ugly draft that makes sense only
Well, I'm still confused what you're after...
Am So., 13. Jan. 2019 um 13:43 Uhr schrieb Gloops :
> Hello Harm!
> Sorry, I did not express myself well!
> I want to go through "Ez_numbers_engraver_harm"
> to convert NoteHead to a number and display AmbitusNoteHead directly.
> I do not want (if pos
Klaus Ethgen writes:
> Hi,
>
> Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 18:13 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Yeah. Somebody considered a good idea to override the defaults and
>> enable experimental Guile-2 support.
>
> Grml, that overwrite was necessary as other systems pulled in that
> guile2. And it seems to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi David,
I was able to downgrade. It fixed the problem. Many thanks. (The other
tool was autogen that pulled this experimental version.)
Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 18:13 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Instead of having the touted 10% speed advantage of G
Il 13/01/2019 00:46, Carl Sorensen ha scritto:
I think that Lilypond does the right thing.
Thank you for your opinion, but I think a collision is not a right thing.
There should never be a unison and a second in a chord.
I know that is not a very common situation. I'll show you two example
Il giorno dom 13 gen 2019 alle 9:15, Andrew Bernard
ha scritto:
Does anybody use the lilypond mode for the Atom editor? Is it any
good? I'd be interested to hear opinions.
I'm a long term emacs user, but Atom seems to be progressing nicely.
Andrew
Hi Andrew
AFAIK, there's no "lilypond
Hi Paolo,
your solution works but generates collision between the sharp and the
time signature :)
I tried this:
\score {
{
1
}
}
and there is no collision with time signature.
However, if the chord is my code doesn't work well
again.
I think that there is not an easy solution th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 18:13 schrieb David Kastrup:
> Yeah. Somebody considered a good idea to override the defaults and
> enable experimental Guile-2 support.
Grml, that overwrite was necessary as other systems pulled in that
guile2. And i
Am So., 13. Jan. 2019 um 17:48 Uhr schrieb Klaus Ethgen
:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 16:10 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> > Please enter in terminal:
> > lilypond scheme-sandbox
> >
> > A guile-prompt will open, then do there:
> > (v
Klaus Ethgen writes:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 16:10 schrieb Thomas Morley:
>> Please enter in terminal:
>> lilypond scheme-sandbox
>>
>> A guile-prompt will open, then do there:
>> (version)
>>
>> Please post what you get.
>
>> lilypond scheme-sandbox
>
>GNU LilyPond 2.19.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Thomas,
Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 16:10 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> Please enter in terminal:
> lilypond scheme-sandbox
>
> A guile-prompt will open, then do there:
> (version)
>
> Please post what you get.
> lilypond scheme-sandbox
GNU LilyP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 17:02 schrieb David Kastrup:
> For stuff like encoding problems it is _absolutely_ necessary that you
> specify the operating system you use, the LilyPond version you use, and
> whether you used the distributed installe
Klaus Ethgen writes:
> Hi,
>
> I like the lilypond package and I decided to dive into for my guitar
> playing book.
>
> Unfortunately I stumble over two problems which can be seen in the
> example attached.
>
> - First there is the German umlauts. As you can see in the example, it
> is correct
Sending this again, because google or firefox or whatever buggy
program messed up the mail-adress
Am So., 13. Jan. 2019 um 16:10 Uhr schrieb Thomas Morley
:
>
> Am So., 13. Jan. 2019 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Klaus Ethgen
see:
> :
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA512
> >
> > Hi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Andrew,
Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 14:57 schrieb N. Andrew Walsh:
> On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 2:50 PM Klaus Ethgen
> wrote:
> > - First there is the German umlauts. As you can see in the example, it
> > is correct encoded in UTF-8 but the umlauts
Am So., 13. Jan. 2019 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Klaus Ethgen
:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi Lukas,
>
> Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 15:01 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
> [Charset problem]
> > This is strange, because I can't reproduce the problem here. On my (Linux
> > Mint) m
Hi Klaus,
Note that \lyricsto implicitly starts \lyricmode. (Also I'd recommend
writing Mond __ if the note with the syllable "Mond" has a tie.)
That one is a bit tricky.
It is a half and a quarter note that should sound like a dotted half
note. But the "Mond" should be sung only on the half n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi Lukas,
Am So den 13. Jan 2019 um 15:01 schrieb Lukas-Fabian Moser:
[Charset problem]
> This is strange, because I can't reproduce the problem here. On my (Linux
> Mint) machine, the German umlauts are displayed fine without any change in
> your d
Am 13.01.19 um 13:42 schrieb Klaus Ethgen:
- First there is the German umlauts. As you can see in the example, it
is correct encoded in UTF-8 but the umlauts are encoded as "??".
I did already try to use no bomb or even in latin1 encoding. But
nothing helped.
Cannot reproduce. Which
Hi Klaus,
Am 13.01.19 um 13:42 schrieb Klaus Ethgen:
- First there is the German umlauts. As you can see in the example, it
is correct encoded in UTF-8 but the umlauts are encoded as "??".
I did already try to use no bomb or even in latin1 encoding. But
nothing helped.
This is strange
Hi Klaus,
On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 2:50 PM Klaus Ethgen
wrote:
>
> - First there is the German umlauts. As you can see in the example, it
> is correct encoded in UTF-8 but the umlauts are encoded as "??".
> I did already try to use no bomb or even in latin1 encoding. But
> nothing helped.
>
Hi,
I like the lilypond package and I decided to dive into for my guitar
playing book.
Unfortunately I stumble over two problems which can be seen in the
example attached.
- First there is the German umlauts. As you can see in the example, it
is correct encoded in UTF-8 but the umlauts are enc
Bonjour Valentin !
Je connais la liste française mais je n'ai rien trouvé concernant ce sujet,
c'est pourquoi j'ai posté ici...
En tout cas merci de l'avoir suggérer!
Peut être à bientôt sur la liste française...
Gilles
--
Sent from: http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/User-f3.html
__
Thomas Morley-2 wrote
> Am Fr., 11. Jan. 2019 um 10:04 Uhr schrieb Gloops <
> yagloops@
> >:
>>
>> Hello Harm
>> Thank you for this correction ...
>> Is there any way to engrave the ambitus directly without going through
>> "note-head :: brew-ez-stencil" in order to avoid the head of the note?
>>
Does anybody use the lilypond mode for the Atom editor? Is it any good? I'd
be interested to hear opinions.
I'm a long term emacs user, but Atom seems to be progressing nicely.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gn
26 matches
Mail list logo
