Hello Sebastian,
what do you mean with "return"? Do want to add the score immediatly or
do you want to return an object containing both?
You used the parser-location arguments in your scheme-function, so I
guess you are using stable (2.18). I created an example for 2.18
(incomplete) and one for 2.
On 2018-10-11 1:22 am, Sebastian Käppler wrote:
Hello,
I wonder if it is possible to return markup AND score from a single
scheme
function, something like this:
example = #(define-scheme-function (parser location) ()
#{
\markup "Test"
\score {
c'4
}
#}
)
I created some scr
Hi Urs,
The centering of the slur stencil destroys its alignment (i.e. reference
point), so I'd just leave it alone and center-align the text by explicitly
calculating the necessary markup x shift from the stencil extents.
%%
\version "2.19.82"
annotatedSlur =
#(define-music-fun
Hi,
Thank you for this little function Lukas! It is very good and useful. Would
it be possible to add to the list the choice for "square" or "bracket"? Some
editions are using squares for grouping Violins 1-2.
Ah, do you mean an extra bracket? No problem. I also added the
possibility to skip s
Hi,
I modified the snippet
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/snippets/text#text-center-text-below-hairpin-dynamics
to create a slur with added centered text. It took me little effort to
adapt the snippet to work with a slur instead of a hairpin but I have
two problems I didn't manag
Lukas-Fabian Moser wrote
>> With a little bit of scheme, it should even be easy to make this into
>> a function accepting to parameters, indicating that k staves starting
>> with the n'th staff should be braced.
>
> Here is an implementation of that. Unfortunately I do not know if/how it
> is p
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Hi David,
>
>>> Here is an implementation of that. Unfortunately I do not know if/how
>>> it is possible to define the function (which issues a \set) in such a
>>> way that it might be called in a \with block, which would be neater
>>> imho.
>> Have you tried just cal
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
> Hi David,
>
>>> Here is an implementation of that. Unfortunately I do not know if/how
>>> it is possible to define the function (which issues a \set) in such a
>>> way that it might be called in a \with block, which would be neater
>>> imho.
>> Have you tried just cal
Hi David,
Here is an implementation of that. Unfortunately I do not know if/how
it is possible to define the function (which issues a \set) in such a
way that it might be called in a \with block, which would be neater
imho.
Have you tried just calling it in a \with block? Stuff like \set is
au
Lukas-Fabian Moser writes:
>> With a little bit of scheme, it should even be easy to make this
>> into a function accepting to parameters, indicating that k staves
>> starting with the n'th staff should be braced.
>
> Here is an implementation of that. Unfortunately I do not know if/how
> it is p
With a little bit of scheme, it should even be easy to make this into
a function accepting to parameters, indicating that k staves starting
with the n'th staff should be braced.
Here is an implementation of that. Unfortunately I do not know if/how it
is possible to define the function (which
Im following you instructions Jamie Ching this is what the compiler says
after the first configure:
WARNING: Please consider installing optional programs or files:
guile-2.0 < 1.9.0 (installed: 2.0.13)
ERROR: Please install required programs: International New Century
Schoolbook fonts (make sure
Hello,
I wonder if it is possible to return markup AND score from a single scheme
function, something like this:
example = #(define-scheme-function (parser location) ()
#{
\markup "Test"
\score {
c'4
}
#}
)
I created some scripts for teaching and want to include task-markup be
foxfanfare writes:
> foxfanfare wrote
>> This works better for most of the
>> cases, but in this example, I was unable to group the celli and double
>> bass
>> staves...
>
> Answering my own problem here. I don't know how I got it, but after some
> experimentations, I found:
> \set StaffGroup.sys
Hi,
In the meantime, I found another solution for this, but this doesn't appear
to be the easiest way to do it! I used systemStartDelimiterHierarchy instead
which doesn't add any space within a family group. Again, with the LilyPond
exemple, this will give:
[...]
I would be interested if someo
foxfanfare wrote
> This works better for most of the
> cases, but in this example, I was unable to group the celli and double
> bass
> staves...
Answering my own problem here. I don't know how I got it, but after some
experimentations, I found:
\set StaffGroup.systemStartDelimiterHierarchy =
Thanks for your reply SoundsFromSound, unfortunately, this doesn't solve my
problem. I may have been unclear of what the problem is.
I tried to understand how it was possible to configure in LP a full score
layout. I searched for some templates and read how family groups works
(http://lilypond.org
17 matches
Mail list logo
