On 2018-05-26 06:15, Robert Schmaus wrote:
so far, I was completely satisfied with out-of-the box lilypond and
rarely used anything involving scheme. Mainly because, I find this
language very counter-intuitive, but that's maybe because I code in
C-like languages all the time.
Hi Robert,
This i
Crimson,
May I call you Crimson?
This worked for me, is it what you want?
\version "2.19.81"
\score{
{
\clef "bass"
<\parenthesize f->~ f,~ >2\> 8\! r8 r4
}
}
Mark
From: lilypond-user [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+carsonmark=ca.rr@gnu.org]
On Behalf Of crimsonsunr...@
crimsonsunr...@protonmail.com writes:
> I tested this on 2.18.2, 2.19.48 and 2.21.0. None print the crescendo
> or decrescendo haripins, no matter where you put them. It also doesn't
> warn or complain about anything:
>
> \score{
> {
> \clef "bass"
> }
>
> Is there a way to make it work?
They ar
I tested this on 2.18.2, 2.19.48 and 2.21.0. None print the crescendo or
decrescendo haripins, no matter where you put them. It also doesn't warn or
complain about anything:
\score{
{
\clef "bass"
<\parenthesize f->~ f,~\> >2 8 r8 r4
}
Is there a way to make it work?
Robert Schmaus writes:
> Dear Ponderers,
>
> so far, I was completely satisfied with out-of-the box lilypond and
> rarely used anything involving scheme. Mainly because, I find this
> language very counter-intuitive, but that's maybe because I code in
> C-like languages all the time.
>
> Anyway,
Dear Ponderers,
so far, I was completely satisfied with out-of-the box lilypond and
rarely used anything involving scheme. Mainly because, I find this
language very counter-intuitive, but that's maybe because I code in
C-like languages all the time.
Anyway, my project was to make me a functi
Am 25.05.2018 um 13:13 schrieb Thomas Morley:
> Hi,
>
> you'll need a spanner from note to note, Glissando is your best bet, I'd say.
> I once made the attached code.
Wow! That solves the problem. This fancy glissando can be fine tuned for
each instrument, so that it produces nearly the picture o
