Am 27.01.2018 um 16:53 schrieb Stefano Troncaro:
Thanks guys!
Urs, your explanation is very detailed and dissipated any remaining
doubts I had left about this issue.
Glad to hear :-)
Jan-Peter, I pulled the changes and after a quick test going through
some files everything seems to be w
> In my previous question, I saw a change in \afterGrace. What other new
> and interesting changes are there?
Hi Dave,
this page is usually a good place to look at for exactly that question:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes-big-page.html
Cheers,
Joram
___
On 1/27/2018 12:05 PM, Dave Higgins wrote:
In my previous question, I saw a change in \afterGrace. What other
new and interesting changes are there?
1) http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/changes/index.html
2) https://sourceforge.net/p/testlilyissues/issues/search/?q=2.19.80
3) https:/
In my previous question, I saw a change in \afterGrace. What other new
and interesting changes are there?
--
Dave
--
I marvel at the strength of human weakness.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listi
Thanks guys!
Urs, your explanation is very detailed and dissipated any remaining doubts
I had left about this issue.
Jan-Peter, I pulled the changes and after a quick test going through some
files everything seems to be working fine. I'll let you know if something
comes up.
About writing an expl
On 1/27/2018 10:29 AM, Thomas Morley wrote:
2018-01-27 15:26 GMT+01:00 Ben :
On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote:
Hi, everybody!
In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the
articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening?
\relative c' {
\stemUp
2018-01-27 15:03 GMT+01:00 Dave Higgins :
> Is there a more elegant way to do this? In transcribing multiple parts, it
> becomes tedious to have to put the cadenza in all the parts. Or I just
> decrease the multi-measure rest by one and add the cue voice to the single
> measure rest left over.
>
2018-01-27 15:26 GMT+01:00 Ben :
> On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote:
>
> Hi, everybody!
>
> In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the
> articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening?
>
> \relative c' {
> \stemUp
> \tuplet 3/2 4 {
> c8 d e f
Thank you for your feedback Stefano!
I merged some code, which was pending quite some time. There was an
issue with the first moment inside a context that is fixed now, *but* in
your example it does not work (yet). This was quite tricky to track
down: If you create a new Voice inside a new Voi
On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote:
Hi, everybody!
In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the
articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening?
\relative c' {
\stemUp
\tuplet 3/2 4 {
c8 d e f g a b c d e f g
c,,8^> d e f^> g a b^> c d e^
On 1/26/2018 11:32 PM, Tiago Pereira wrote:
Hi, everybody!
In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the
articulation is added. How to prevent this from happening?
\relative c' {
\stemUp
\tuplet 3/2 4 {
c8 d e f g a b c d e f g
c,,8^> d e f^> g a b^> c d e^
Is there a more elegant way to do this? In transcribing multiple parts,
it becomes tedious to have to put the cadenza in all the parts. Or I
just decrease the multi-measure rest by one and add the cue voice to the
single measure rest left over.
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c' {
\comp
Hi, everybody!
In the example below, the tuplet number is moved upwards when the articulation
is added. How to prevent this from happening?
\relative c' {
\stemUp
\tuplet 3/2 4 {
c8 d e f g a b c d e f g
c,,8^> d e f^> g a b^> c d e^> f g }
}
Thanks anyway.
___
13 matches
Mail list logo
