Hi Simon,
As a native English speaker, allow me to say that the examples you have
given are not grammatical gender but literary. English does not have such a
thing. Since there are no gendered definite or indefinite articles ('the',
'a') there is just no such concept in English grammar.
Often peo
> The diminutive of „Magd“ is „Mägdelein“ or maybe „Mägdchen“ (nobody
> would use the latter), but not „Mädchen“.
But still "Mädchen" seems to be derived from "Magd":
http://www.wissen.de/wortherkunft/maedchen
Cheers,
Joram
___
lilypond-user mailing l
On 14.11.2017 20:36, Blöchl Bernhard wrote:
(neuter). "Die Mad", "Das Madchen" likewise. Again, here English is very
unusual ...
I argue there is meant "Die Magd"
The diminutive of „Magd“ is „Mägdelein“ or maybe „Mägdchen“ (nobody
would use the latter), but not „Mädchen“.
Best, Simon
On 14.11.2017 18:54, Wols Lists wrote:
It's the same with gender - and that can also be confusing especially
when making a diminutive. "Die Frau" (feminine), "Das Fraulein"
(neuter). "Die Mad", "Das Madchen" likewise.
Actually, the base word is „Die Maid“. Mark Twain has famously and
hilarious
On 14.11.2017 09:40, Robert Murdoch wrote:
Now I'm wondering if I can apply the patch at
https://codereview.appspot.com/332990043 to my Windows binary file.
No you can’t, since the patch changes the C++ part which is compiled to
form the binary. So you’d have to build LilyPond yourself – or in
Hello David,
\single it not the solution, but \temporary…\undo is.
Thanks for your help!
JM
> Le 14 nov. 2017 à 13:42, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
> Jacques Menu Muzhic writes:
>
>> Hello Ben,
>>
>> How can one undo the effect of tupletBracketToSlur to use it on a
>> per-tuplet basis?
>> Pr
2017-11-14 20:08 GMT+01:00 Robert Blackstone :
> Thank you very much, Harm.
> Two solutions. No way that I would ever have been able to figure this out.
> I'm very impressed.
>
> The "bad news" is that only the first part of my problem is solved. What I
> would need is a cross-staff arpeggio that
...
(neuter). "Die Mad", "Das Madchen" likewise. Again, here English is
very
unusual ...
I argue there is meant "Die Magd", "das Mädchen" for maid/maiden in the
job sensefarmgirl or maidservant. I argue Magd instead of Mad. (My
talent for languages is absolutely nought.)
Regards
Cheers,
Hi Ben (I assume that is your name),
Thank you very much. I recognized my stupid mistakes, one a typo, the other an
oversight when I converted the relative pitches into the absolute pitches.
I simply did not notice that the same grace-note is bes'8 on its first
occurrence and bes8 on the seco
Thank you very much, Harm.
Two solutions. No way that I would ever have been able to figure this out. I'm
very impressed.
The "bad news" is that only the first part of my problem is solved. What I
would need is a cross-staff arpeggio that includes the bass notes (in this
testfile; the, or a, re
2017-11-14 17:39 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2017-11-14 13:23 GMT+01:00 Robert Blackstone :
>> Hello,
>>
>> Snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=410 shows an excellent way to
>> insert a grace note between an arpeggio and the arpeggiated chord
>
> Looking at the snippet, I thought what a mes
On 14/11/17 16:50, Karlin High wrote:
> And I just learned something there:
>
> "Der Hund hat den Mann gebissen" and
> "Den Mann hat der Hund gebissen"
> both mean "The dog has bitten the man".
>
> I knew the Russian language had that word-order feature/bug, but didn't
> realize German did too. M
On 11/14/2017 2:39 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Luther basically has been the last major such moment in German, with the
shift from Mittelhochdeutsch already being behind.
Here's a "very short introduction" to the German language. It's aimed at
English speakers, and has a few paragraphs of origins
2017-11-14 13:23 GMT+01:00 Robert Blackstone :
> Hello,
>
> Snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=410 shows an excellent way to
> insert a grace note between an arpeggio and the arpeggiated chord
Looking at the snippet, I thought what a mess. All those added Voices,
hide and unhide Notes, ig
Understood. Sorry to hear it, though. Well, I'll try waiting out a bit
more. Seems the devs are hard at work squashing bugs.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On 11/14/2017 7:23 AM, Robert Blackstone wrote:
Hello,
Snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=410 shows an excellent way to insert
a grace note between an arpeggio and the arpeggiated chord (BTW, the example is
from Chopin's Nocturne No. 11 Op. 37, No. 1, not Op.37 No. 2 )
Anyway, in this
Robert Blackstone writes:
> Hello,
>
> Snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=410 shows an excellent way
> to insert a grace note between an arpeggio and the arpeggiated chord
> (BTW, the example is from Chopin's Nocturne No. 11 Op. 37, No. 1, not
> Op.37 No. 2 )
>
> Anyway, in this form it c
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 2:40 AM, Robert Murdoch
wrote:
Now I'm wondering if I can apply the patch at
https://codereview.appspot.com/332990043 to my Windows binary file.
The patch is for .cc and .hh files, which to me says "C++ source code."
I think it would take a god-like understanding of
Hello,
Snippet http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=410 shows an excellent way to insert
a grace note between an arpeggio and the arpeggiated chord (BTW, the example is
from Chopin's Nocturne No. 11 Op. 37, No. 1, not Op.37 No. 2 )
Anyway, in this form it compiles on my system. But since I prefer
You could also generate it dynamically at runtime, with something like this
(please note that I haven't tested it):
gradual = #(define-music-function (f mus) (procedure? ly:music?)
(make-simulaneous-music
(list mus (make-sequential-music
(let ((len (lambda (l) (ly:music-leng
On 14 November 2017 at 11:30, David Kastrup wrote:
> Gianmaria Lari writes:
>
> > On 13 November 2017 at 13:31, Caagr98 wrote:
> >
> >> I was thinking of something like this:
> >>
> >> <<
> >> { c'1 }
> >> { s8 \set Voice.midiExpression=#0.5 s2.. Voice.midiExpression=#1 }
> >> >> c'1
> >>
>
Patrick Smith writes:
> I can wait for 2.21.0.
>
> I'll continuing coding with the assumption that the macrovariable will
> indeed be a one-for-one, text in-place, copy of the original.
>
> On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:44 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
>> Caagr98 writes:
>>
>> >> On 11/14/17 13:21, Pa
I can wait for 2.21.0.
I'll continuing coding with the assumption that the macrovariable will
indeed be a one-for-one, text in-place, copy of the original.
On Tue, Nov 14, 2017 at 7:44 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Caagr98 writes:
>
> >> On 11/14/17 13:21, Patrick Smith wrote:
> >>> This works:
>
Andrew Bernard wrote
> Hi Ben,
>
> Would you consider adding this to openlilylib? I am happy to help out with
> that if needed. This is too excellent to be lost in the mailing list
> archives forever.
>
> Andrew
>
> ___
> lilypond-user mailing list
>
Hi Ben,
Would you consider adding this to openlilylib? I am happy to help out with
that if needed. This is too excellent to be lost in the mailing list
archives forever.
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/m
Caagr98 writes:
>> On 11/14/17 13:21, Patrick Smith wrote:
>>> This works:
>>>
>>> \version "2.18.2"
>>> \relative c' {
>>> \time 2/4
>>> c4 c( d) d( e) e( f) f( g) g( a) a( b) b( c) c( b) b( a) a( g) g(
>>> f) f( e) e( d) d( c2)~ c2 \fermata \bar "|."
>>> layout{}
>>> }
>>>
>>> This doe
Jacques Menu Muzhic writes:
> Hello Ben,
>
> How can one undo the effect of tupletBracketToSlur to use it on a
> per-tuplet basis?
> Prefixing it with \once is not a solution I’ve seen.
>
> Below, I’d like the third triplet to use square brackets again:
>
> {
> a a \tuplet 3/2 { a8 a a } a4 |
> How can one undo the effect of tupletBracketToSlur to use it on a
> per-tuplet basis? Prefixing it with \once is not a solution I’ve
> seen.
Try `\single'.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailma
In the first version, you're applying the \fermata post-event to the c2, which
is perfectly valid. In the second one, you're applying it to the {...}, which
doesn't make sense. I'm afraid I don't know any good solution, though.
On 11/14/17 13:21, Patrick Smith wrote:
> This works:
>
> \version
This works:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c' {
\time 2/4
c4 c( d) d( e) e( f) f( g) g( a) a( b) b( c) c( b) b( a) a( g) g( f) f(
e) e( d) d( c2)~ c2 \fermata \bar "|."
layout{}
}
This doesn't work:
\version "2.18.2"
macrovariable = {c4 c( d) d( e) e( f) f( g) g( a) a( b) b( c) c( b) b( a)
a
Hello Ben,
How can one undo the effect of tupletBracketToSlur to use it on a per-tuplet
basis?
Prefixing it with \once is not a solution I’ve seen.
Below, I’d like the third triplet to use square brackets again:
{
a a \tuplet 3/2 { a8 a a } a4 | %!
\tupletBracketToSlur % HERE OK
a a \t
Hello Ben,
Yes, that’s the solution I was looking for, thanks so much!
JM
> Le 14 nov. 2017 à 12:25, Ben a écrit :
>
> On 11/14/2017 5:02 AM, Menu Jacques wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> MusicXML has the notion of curved tuplets brackets:
>>
>> > start"/>
>>
>> Didn’t find anything i
On 11/14/2017 5:02 AM, Menu Jacques wrote:
Hello folks,
MusicXML has the notion of curved tuplets brackets:
Didn’t find anything in the doc nor snippets. How can that be achieved with
LilyPond?
Thanks for your help!
JM
Hi,
Is this what you mean?
(see attached)
Also, what
Gianmaria Lari writes:
> On 13 November 2017 at 13:31, Caagr98 wrote:
>
>> I was thinking of something like this:
>>
>> <<
>> { c'1 }
>> { s8 \set Voice.midiExpression=#0.5 s2.. Voice.midiExpression=#1 }
>> >> c'1
>>
>> That is, simultaneously: a) play a note, b) wait a short while, reduce
>
Hello folks,
MusicXML has the notion of curved tuplets brackets:
Didn’t find anything in the doc nor snippets. How can that be achieved with
LilyPond?
Thanks for your help!
JM
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https
On 13 November 2017 at 13:31, Caagr98 wrote:
> I was thinking of something like this:
>
> <<
> { c'1 }
> { s8 \set Voice.midiExpression=#0.5 s2.. Voice.midiExpression=#1 }
> >> c'1
>
> That is, simultaneously: a) play a note, b) wait a short while, reduce
> volume, wait until rest of the note
Thanks to all list members who answered.
I decided to use the solution from the blog of Urs in the file
"alternating-time-signatures.ly". It works very fine. It seems to me to
be a more general approach than the similar solution from Joshua (thanks
to him too).
The question of a good-looking posi
David Wright writes:
> Fair enough; I didn't know that. So how far back do you have to go in
> German to hear things that would sound archaic or stilted to modern
> ears?
I sound archaic or stilted to modern ears. It's a bit of a moving
target, but Luther was a language trendsetter regarding wr
Hi,
I was wondering if it was possible to apply patch files to binaries on
Windows, and if so how to do it.
I have been waiting for about a month for LilyPond 2.19.81 where
hopefully the problem with the repeat ties in chords will be fixed (in
case any reader doesn't know, as of 2.19.80 repe
39 matches
Mail list logo
