Hi All,
I have been working closely with Craig to study the matter. Interestingly,
in this large incomplete score as received, it consumed an ever expanding
amount of memory until it crashed with no output. I observed a set of
warnings regarding missing parts. In my experience one ignores lilypond
2017-06-26 0:33 GMT+02:00 Maxime's Music :
> Hi all,
>
> Thanks for all your efforts with this. I'm out of internet range till
> Wednesday. Just trying to survive on my phone.
>
> Harm, if you'd like to forward those files, that's fine.
>
> Craig
Done.
Best,
Harm
__
Hi all,
Thanks for all your efforts with this. I'm out of internet range till
Wednesday. Just trying to survive on my phone.
Harm, if you'd like to forward those files, that's fine.
Craig
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 at 8:20 am, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2017-06-26 0:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Gerdau :
> >> I'd
2017-06-26 0:00 GMT+02:00 Michael Gerdau :
>> I'd be happy to test. I've an 8 Gig Ubuntu machine (my Gub builder) an
>> 8 Gig Windows 10 and my day-to-day 6 Gig Vista. I could test with any
>> of those. Would require the score privately.
>
> If it is still of interest, I could run on either my 1
> I'd be happy to test. I've an 8 Gig Ubuntu machine (my Gub builder) an
> 8 Gig Windows 10 and my day-to-day 6 Gig Vista. I could test with any
> of those. Would require the score privately.
If it is still of interest, I could run on either my 16GB ArchLinux
Laptop or my 64GB ArchLinux DB Serv
Hello Harm and David,
Thanks for the explanations and example!
I copied a sample from the snippets and modified it, without taking care about
detailed semantics.
Now I know how to do things the right way depending on the context.
JM
> Le 25 juin 2017 à 10:44, David Kastrup a écrit :
>
> Thom
2017-06-23 3:30 GMT+02:00 David Wright :
> On Thu 22 Jun 2017 at 17:10:56 (-0700), tisimst wrote:
>
> > My experience tells me that although the staff-size is larger in the
> second
> > \bookpart, the horizontal treatment isn't going to be a normal 17pt. It
> > will still be more like the 15pt glo
Hello!
This is my first post (question) to all Lilypond-User list members, so my
apology if this issue has been resolved already. I welcome your guidance in
this matter and thank you for you time.
Attached you will find three .ly files corresponding to the engraving of a
short example from Arvo Pä
Am 25.06.2017 um 20:45 schrieb Remy CLAVERIE:
I think that you have to donwload the fonts into the '.fonts' directory of your
home (beware to the 's' at the end of the name). If it does'nt exist, you must
create it. Then, run the 'fc-cache -v- -f' and all the new fonts should be
available fo
Hi Luca,
I think that you have to donwload the fonts into the '.fonts' directory of your
home (beware to the 's' at the end of the name). If it does'nt exist, you must
create it. Then, run the 'fc-cache -v- -f' and all the new fonts should be
available for all the software, including libreof
Hi
Am 25.06.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Ivanov Dmitry:
> Would it be better to move:
>
> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
>
> to the layout block as well? Or keep it as is?
Fist, \omit is always equivalent to setting the stencil to false (##f)
Richard Shann writes:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:54 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
>> > move it to a layout block:
>> >
>> > \layout { \omit Fingering }
>>
>> Great. Would it be better to move:
>>
>> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
>> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
>>
>
Hello,
I have searched for this information on READMEs, internet search engines and on
previous Lilypond emails but I didn't understand how to move.
I am on Ubuntu and I would like to add one font from the OpenLilyPontFonts
repository to my Lilypond. Can someone give me a few hints on how to m
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 18:54 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
> > move it to a layout block:
> >
> > \layout { \omit Fingering }
>
> Great. Would it be better to move:
>
> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
> \override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
>
> to the layout block as well? Or ke
> move it to a layout block:
>
> \layout { \omit Fingering }
Great. Would it be better to move:
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
to the layout block as well? Or keep it as is?
On 6/25/17, Richard Shann wrote:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:3
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 17:34 +0300, Ivanov Dmitry wrote:
> I have a problem with several voices:
>
> \version "2.18.2"
> \language "english"
> \paper {
> indent = 0
> }
> \new Staff \relative f''{
> \time 2/4
> \once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
> \override Staff.Clef #'st
Thanks for the help. This works.
-Original Message-
From: Kieren MacMillan [mailto:kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca]
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 10:56 AM
To: Lilypond-User Mailing List
Cc: Joseph Srednicki
Subject: Re: How to move markup horizontally
Hi Joe,
> I am trying to move markup
Hi Joe,
> I am trying to move markup horizontally. See the following example:
>
> \version "2.19.58" {
> \relative c' {d4_\markup{\pad-x #7.0 {\line{R.\dynamic{p d d d}
> }
Here are two possible solutions:
%%% SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.19.58"
\markup \bold "This keeps the 'R.' and dyn
I have a problem with several voices:
\version "2.18.2"
\language "english"
\paper {
indent = 0
}
\new Staff \relative f''{
\time 2/4
\once \override Staff.TimeSignature #'stencil = ##f
\override Staff.Clef #'stencil = ##f
\omit Fingering
\relative g'' { <<
\new Voice \relative
Manuela and Andrew:
Thanks for the answers. These examples work for me.
Joe Srednick
From: Manuela Gößnitzer [mailto:pressephotogra...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2017 1:22 AM
To: Andrew Bernard
Cc: Joseph Srednicki ; lilypond-user Mailinglist
Subject: Re: How to move markup h
I use this construction:
\version "2.18.2"
melody = {
%\override Score.BarNumber.break-visibility = ##(#t #t #t)
\time 5/4 b2.( b4 ) r4 |
}
harmonies = \chordmode { b2.:min fis2:min7 | }
\layout {
\context {
\Score
\remove "Bar_number_engraver"
}
\context {
\Staff
\co
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 12:55 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Richard Shann writes:
>
> > On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> Manuela Gößnitzer writes:
> >>
> >> > You have the right idea already ;-)
> >> > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context
> >> >
> >> > Tr
Yes there is a way but it has disadvantages.
Often the result is awkward jumps. I indicate changed notes by note head
style and colour so that it is easier to edit the results.
If you are still interested let me know and I will send you the scheme
procedure and an example. I allow for diff
Richard Shann writes:
> On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Manuela Gößnitzer writes:
>>
>> > You have the right idea already ;-)
>> > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context
>> >
>> > Try
>> >
>> > \override Fingering.stencil = ##f
>> >
>> > (I hope this synta
I'd be happy to test. I've an 8 Gig Ubuntu machine (my Gub builder) an 8
Gig Windows 10 and my day-to-day 6 Gig Vista. I could test with any of
those. Would require the score privately.
--
Phil Holmes
- Original Message -
From: "Thomas Morley"
To: "Maxime's Music"
Cc: "lilypond
On Sun, 2017-06-25 at 08:08 +0200, David Kastrup wrote:
> Manuela Gößnitzer writes:
>
> > You have the right idea already ;-)
> > The Fingering stencil is part of the Voice context
> >
> > Try
> >
> > \override Fingering.stencil = ##f
> >
> > (I hope this syntax works with 2.18)
>
> As does
>
>
2017-06-23 11:09 GMT+02:00 Maxime's Music :
> Thanks for taking a look at this for me.
Hi Craig,
as long as I don't need to post larger amounts of your code I'll answer onlist.
Hope this is ok with you.
That said, I was not able to compile your code in a reasonable amount of time.
I always abort
Manuela Gößnitzer writes:
> Try
>
> \override Fingering.stencil = ##f
David Kastrup writes:
> As does
>
>\omit Fingering
Thanks a lot. Both variants work.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listin
You need to split the music expression, I cannot think of a different
solution because
\transpose c e, \music
would be too low.
2017-06-25 10:29 GMT+02:00 Gianmaria Lari :
> The result of a transpose operation sometimes generate notes that are too
> high (or too low) for my needs. In this case
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2017-06-25 8:40 GMT+02:00 Menu Jacques :
>> Thanks Simon for the idea.
>>
>> I’ve defined the following Scheme function for my needs, with accidental
>> style forced to ‘forget' for the given note:
>>
>> editorialAccidental =
>> #(define-music-function
>> (note)
>> (l
2017-06-25 8:40 GMT+02:00 Menu Jacques :
> Thanks Simon for the idea.
>
> I’ve defined the following Scheme function for my needs, with accidental
> style forced to ‘forget' for the given note:
>
> editorialAccidental =
> #(define-music-function
> (note)
> (ly:music?)
> #{
> \once\accide
The result of a transpose operation sometimes generate notes that are too
high (or too low) for my needs. In this case I would like to have these
notes one octave lower (or higher).
Is there any way to indicate a range where the notes should stay when
applying a transpose function?
Here it is an
32 matches
Mail list logo
