2016-12-13 1:20 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2016-12-12 2:20 GMT+01:00 Freddy Ouellette :
>> The table of contents seems to list its items by the order in which they
>> were evaluated by the parser, and not by where they actually appear in the
>> book... Is there a way to avoid this?
>>
>> for examp
2016-12-12 2:20 GMT+01:00 Freddy Ouellette :
> The table of contents seems to list its items by the order in which they
> were evaluated by the parser, and not by where they actually appear in the
> book... Is there a way to avoid this?
>
> for example, even though partB comes AFTER partA in the bo
Bonjour Pierre,
French is not noise. It is beautiful!
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
OK, I managed to put together a hack
(based on an idea from Simon: simple voice construct, hiding second voice)
Looks to me as a rather ugly hack ;-) but at least I got what I wanted in a
relatively simple form.
% insert a courtesy voice cross over sign: melody changes from RH to LH
(this is _not
Hi Simon
Thanks for your reply.
I don't think I understand your solution.
Are you suggesting to add a new voice trough all the score for just one
sign in one place?
(I tried to add a new voice locally but I couldn't figure it out, it
created a horrible mess even with \cadenzaOn)
PS. I am always
Wrong list.
Sorry for the noise.
Cheers,
Pierre
Le 12 décembre 2016 à 14:44, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> a écrit :
> Bonjour à Tous,
>
> Petite question HS mais importante (pour moi) :
> Un souci de mise en page me force à passer une partie d'un texte à la
> ligne a
Bonjour à Tous,
Petite question HS mais importante (pour moi) :
Un souci de mise en page me force à passer une partie d'un texte à la ligne
alors que le texte original ne présente pas de passage à la ligne à cet
endroit.
Ma question - qui s'adresse plutôt aux "spécialistes" de l'édition (LaTex ?
D
Am 12. Dezember 2016 13:55:39 MEZ, schrieb Alexander Kobel :
>On 2016-12-12 13:42, Urs Liska wrote:
>> [...]
BTW: Has this warning been disabled somewhere in the unstable
>>> versions?
From 2.19.49, I get no complaint even for
<< { \stemDown b' } \\ a' >>
which clearly colli
On 2016-12-12 13:42, Urs Liska wrote:
[...]
BTW: Has this warning been disabled somewhere in the unstable
versions?
From 2.19.49, I get no complaint even for
<< { \stemDown b' } \\ a' >>
which clearly collides...
I think in this example there actually is no colliding-note-column clash
bec
On 11.12.2016 19:01, Peter Toye wrote:
Ties across voices I want to engrave some piano music which includes
the attached fragment. As I understand it I need a single voice for
the first chord, but two for the second. But the ties can't extend
across voices.
This is exactly the situation for w
Am 12. Dezember 2016 13:27:45 MEZ, schrieb Andrew Bernard
:
>Hi All,
>
>
>
>On 12 December 2016 at 23:24, Alexander Kobel
>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 2016-12-12 12:24, Peter Toye wrote:
>>
>>> Andrew, Urs,
>>>
>>> Thanks both for the ideas. It's interesting.
>>>
>>> Andrew's method works but gi
Hi everybody!
Please test and comment, patch and examples attached.
Cheers,
Knut
>From 456cee254df6133a611f108d2e9ca3671b01886f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Knut Petersen
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2016 13:13:13 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Enhance and clean lyric-extender.cc, add force-extender
property
Hi,
On 2016-12-12 13:27, Andrew Bernard wrote:
On 12 December 2016 at 23:24, Alexander Kobel mailto:a-ko...@a-kobel.de>> wrote:
BTW: Has this warning been disabled somewhere in the unstable
versions? From 2.19.49, I get no complaint even for
<< { \stemDown b' } \\ a' >>
which
Hi All,
On 12 December 2016 at 23:24, Alexander Kobel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2016-12-12 12:24, Peter Toye wrote:
>
>> Andrew, Urs,
>>
>> Thanks both for the ideas. It's interesting.
>>
>> Andrew's method works but gives a warning about clashing note columns
>> but the layout is fine.
>>
>
> you
On 12.12.2016 02:27, Harald Christiansen wrote:
It is NOT one voice in the technical meaning of Lilypond ... it is
more virtual, so to speak.
Then you still need one voice that changes staves, because a
VoiceFollower is definitely the right thing to use, and easiest as well.
Maybe try an extr
Hi,
On 2016-12-12 12:24, Peter Toye wrote:
Andrew, Urs,
Thanks both for the ideas. It's interesting.
Andrew's method works but gives a warning about clashing note columns
but the layout is fine.
you can add a
\once \override NoteColumn.ignore-collision = ##t
before \stemDown; this will sup
Andrew, Urs,
Thanks both for the ideas. It's interesting.
Andrew's method works but gives a warning about clashing note columns but the
layout is fine.
Urs' method gives two different results, depending on whether I put the 4-note
chord in the 1st or 2nd voice. In the 1st voice the layout's
Hi Knut, hi all.
On 2016-12-12 00:52, Knut Petersen wrote:
Hi Alexander
IIUC (I didn't compile it in), your patch inhibits extenders on a
single note, correct?
Yes.
Is that really what we want unconditionally,
Currently we get a short extender ... that is imho of no use and should
be kill
Hi Peter,
Use voices. Just turn the stem down for the first F and A.
\version "2.19.52"
\score {
<<
{
\stemDown
4 ^~
\stemUp
8[ a'' g'']
}
\\
{
4 _~
}
>>
}
Andrew
___
lilypond-user mailing
You still need a workaround, which in the case of your example is not
all that ugly than in some other cases.
Basically you have to double one end of the ties with a hidden voice.
The good thing about your example is that this additional voice is
actually continuing from there .
So where the lowe
I want to engrave some piano music which includes the attached fragment. As I
understand it I need a single voice for the first chord, but two for the
second. But the ties can't extend across voices.
I saw a thread about this in 2007, but I can't get it to work as other normal
ties within voice
Am 12.12.2016 um 10:21 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
> Hi Urs,
>
> just a note: Time-signatures aren't a problem. It just have to be made
> sure, that start and end of the multi-measure-rest are placed on
> measure borders (measure position 0).
>
> Example:
> %%%
> sectionI = { \time 4/4 s1*2 | \time
Hi Urs,
just a note: Time-signatures aren't a problem. It just have to be made
sure, that start and end of the multi-measure-rest are placed on measure
borders (measure position 0).
Example:
%%%
sectionI = { \time 4/4 s1*2 | \time 3/4 s2.*2 }
\new Staff <<
{ \sectionI }
$(mmrest-of-length
Hi Jan-Peter,
Am 12.12.2016 um 09:47 schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
> Hi Urs,
>
> this is a problem, I also had to deal with once in a while.
> As it is no daily problem, I hacked it as needed, but did build a
> generic solution yet.
> But it might be doable, *if* the music is "complete" and has a
> \p
Hi Urs,
this is a problem, I also had to deal with once in a while.
As it is no daily problem, I hacked it as needed, but did build a
generic solution yet.
But it might be doable, *if* the music is "complete" and has a \partial
command in it, which is
#(make-music 'PartialSet 'duration (ly:mak
Hi all,
I have a set-up where pausing sections in a part can be handled by
automatically inserting multimeasure rests whose length is determined by
a meta variable for the sections.
As a MWE this looks like this:
\version "2.19.52"
sectionOne = {
c,1 |
c,1
}
{
#(mmrest-of-length sectionO
26 matches
Mail list logo
