Guys (David, Thomas, Jacques),
thank you very much for the responses. I'll read the Contributor's Guide
and see if I can have more specific questions in the future.
And Jacques, no worries! Your example was still useful to me as it helped
me to realise some things ;)
Cheers,
Leszek.
On 22 Novem
Hello Bogi,
On 23.11.2015 00:50, Bogi Lützen wrote:
Please help me with this little problem.
This is just one of my efforts, but in all of them I miss the stem on the
first g'2:
\version "2.18.0"
{
<<{c''1^~|\stemUp c''2 c''4 c''| c''1}{\stemDown g'2 a' |g' a'
Hi Bogi,
> in all of them I miss the stem on the first g’2:
Perhaps you mean
SNIPPET BEGINS
\version "2.18.0"
theMusic = {
<<
{ \voiceOne c''1 ~ | c''2 }
\new Voice { \voiceTwo g'2 a' | g'2 }
>> \oneVoice 4 q |
1
\bar "|."
}
\score {
\new Staff \theMusic
}
SNIPPET
Hi Bogi,
You need to use the parallel voices correctly. The two voices need ‘\\‘
between them.
<<{c''1^~|\stemUp c''2 c''4 c''| c'’1} \\ {\stemDown g'2 a' |g' a'4 a'| g'1}>>
You can also use \new Voice. Have a look in the Notation Reference manual under
Multiple Voices.
I thought 2.18.2 wa
On 22.11.2015 22:41, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hi all,
Final version here:
https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf
Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in case anybody
spots any critical issue.
The last measure of the Introduction actually has on
Please help me with this little problem.
This is just one of my efforts, but in all of them I miss the stem on the
first g'2:
\version "2.18.0"
{
<<{c''1^~|\stemUp c''2 c''4 c''| c''1}{\stemDown g'2 a' |g' a'4
a'| g'1}>>
\bar "|."
}
y
> Well, System::post_processing ends by creating the stencils of a
> system in reverse order. That's probably not helping.
A bug?
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 4:56 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
> > The following function gives each TextScript grobs on a line a number
> based
> > on its position within the 'all-elements array. Each line should be
> > numbered 1-20 in order, but that's clearly not the case.
David Nalesnik writes:
> The following function gives each TextScript grobs on a line a number based
> on its position within the 'all-elements array. Each line should be
> numbered 1-20 in order, but that's clearly not the case. There's a binding
> of texts which sorts grobs by moment. Commen
Hi,
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 3:00 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> Simon Albrecht writes:
>
> > On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote:
> >> Thomas Morley writes:
> >>
> >>> Though, why it is that arbitrary?
> >>>
> >>> Look at this variation and the attached image:
> >>>
> >>> \version "2.19.29"
>
Alberto,
On Sunday, November 22, 2015, Alberto Simões-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183952...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Final version here:
>
> https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf
>
> Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in case
Hello Leszek,
Oops, looks like I totally misunderstood the kind of help you were looking for…
Sorry for the noise!
JM
> Le 22 nov. 2015 à 17:37, Jacques Menu a écrit :
>
> Hello Leszek,
>
> Here is an example from this list.
>
> JM
>
>
>
> \version "2.18.1"
>
> \layout {
> indent = 0
Hi all,
Final version here:
https://github.com/ambs/music/blob/master/Gounod/LeRendezVous/suite.pdf
Will submit it to IMSLP later to the end of the week, in case anybody
spots any critical issue. I should say I am quite happy with it, and
will print it ASAP to play it :)
Thank you, again, f
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote:
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Though, why it is that arbitrary?
>>>
>>> Look at this variation and the attached image:
>>>
>>> \version "2.19.29"
>>> #(define test-nmbrs
>>>(let ((nmbrs (circular-list 1 2 3 4)))
>>> (l
On 22.11.2015 21:44, David Kastrup wrote:
Thomas Morley writes:
Though, why it is that arbitrary?
Look at this variation and the attached image:
\version "2.19.29"
#(define test-nmbrs
(let ((nmbrs (circular-list 1 2 3 4)))
(lambda (grob)
(let ((n (car nmbrs)))
(set! n
Thomas Morley writes:
> Though, why it is that arbitrary?
>
> Look at this variation and the attached image:
>
> \version "2.19.29"
> #(define test-nmbrs
> (let ((nmbrs (circular-list 1 2 3 4)))
> (lambda (grob)
> (let ((n (car nmbrs)))
> (set! nmbrs (cdr nmbrs))
> (gr
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:18 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>
>> 2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik :
>> >
>> >
>> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> > Is there any way to get the override to
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik :
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Is there any way to get the override to be reevaluated with each
> repeat?
> >>
> >> No. Written in that manner,
2015-11-22 20:49 GMT+01:00 David Nalesnik :
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Is there any way to get the override to be reevaluated with each repeat?
>>
>> No. Written in that manner, the override is evaluated at _input_ time.
>> If you put it in a variable a
On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 1:21 PM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to get the override to be reevaluated with each repeat?
>
> No. Written in that manner, the override is evaluated at _input_ time.
> If you put it in a variable and use that variable 3 times, the colors
> will be the sa
On 12/11/15 17:53, Simon Albrecht wrote:
On 12.11.2015 16:52, Alberto Simões wrote:
Hello, Simon!
On 12/11/15 11:21, Simon Albrecht wrote:
Two annotations:
– Sometimes it would be nice to have whiteout for DynamicTextSpanner
against SpanBar; I don’t quite know the best way to do it, though.
David Nalesnik writes:
> Hi,
>
> Given the following function, each time an override of NoteHead.color
> occurs, a new color from the list is used:
>
> \version "2.19.30"
>
> #(define test
>(let ((colors (circular-list red green blue yellow darkgreen magenta)))
> (lambda ()
>(let
Hi,
Given the following function, each time an override of NoteHead.color
occurs, a new color from the list is used:
\version "2.19.30"
#(define test
(let ((colors (circular-list red green blue yellow darkgreen magenta)))
(lambda ()
(let ((color (car colors)))
(set! color
Hey,
On 11/11/15 19:22, tisimst wrote:
This is looking MUCH better (nice work with the extended dynamic lines
;-). I'll look at it in greater detail later, but here's one thing that
I immediately noticed quite a few instances of that you would get dinged
for: You should ALWAYS enclose a tied no
2015-11-22 16:41 GMT+01:00 Leszek Wroński :
> I was delighted to learn that Lilypond allows one to use custodes. I was
> wondering how they really work, namely, how one can, upon a linebreak, check
> what the next pitch is. I have limited Scheme experience. I first tried the
> code for the first ex
Leszek Wroński writes:
> I was delighted to learn that Lilypond allows one to use custodes. I was
> wondering how they really work, namely, how one can, upon a linebreak,
> check what the next pitch is. I have limited Scheme experience.
> source code, and after grepping found two files of inter
Hello Leszek,
Here is an example from this list.
JM
\version "2.18.1"
\layout {
indent = 0
ragged-right = ##t
\context {
\Staff
\consists "Custos_engraver"
% \override Staff.Custos.stencil = ##f
% \override Staff.Custos.style = ##f
}
}
\relative c' {
d1
Hi
On 22/11/15 13:52, tisimst wrote:
Valse 1 looks great! There's a natural in the LH chord in m. 58 that
shouldn't be there. If so a double check on all accidentals just to be
sauté there aren't others that should or shouldn't be there.
Yep, still fixing slurs, only. I have a couple other fix
> Werner, any suggestions for _not_ using a tie in that manner?
For me, a tie lengthens a time value of a given pitch; it has no other
meaning.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
I was delighted to learn that Lilypond allows one to use custodes. I was
wondering how they really work, namely, how one can, upon a linebreak,
check what the next pitch is. I have limited Scheme experience. I first
tried the code for the first example from here:
http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/D
On Sunday, November 22, 2015, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n183931...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> On 22.11.2015 14:52, tisimst wrote:
> > One other thing I noticed in Valse 2, m. 42-43 - remove staccato from
> > tied end notes. They just don't make sense. I would guess the one in
On 22.11.2015 14:52, tisimst wrote:
One other thing I noticed in Valse 2, m. 42-43 - remove staccato from
tied end notes. They just don't make sense. I would guess the one in
the source engraving (m. 42) is a typo as it is omitted in the next
measure.
It is definitely not. There is perfect c
Alberto,
On Saturday, November 21, 2015, Simon Albrecht-2 [via Lilypond] <
ml-node+s1069038n18391...@n5.nabble.com> wrote:
> On 21.11.2015 20:21, Alberto Simões wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On 20/11/15 11:30, Alberto Simões wrote:
> >> Hey
> >>
> >> On 20/11/2015 05:49, Abraham Lee wrote:
> >>> That bein
Malte Meyn writes:
> Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Urs Liska writes:
>>
>>> Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I
>>> suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the
>>> inner one a slur indicating the bowing.
>>
>> That would not m
Am 21.11.2015 um 20:30 schrieb David Kastrup:
Urs Liska writes:
Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I
suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the
inner one a slur indicating the bowing.
That would not make much sense, really. Phrasing slurs
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 21.11.2015 um 16:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Marc Hohl writes:
>>
>>> Am 21.11.2015 um 10:53 schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
>>> [...]
Looks like there is some sequential iterator consulted for
pending_moment that no longer has an iter_ to refer t
Am 21.11.2015 um 16:54 schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
Am 21.11.2015 um 10:53 schrieb David Kastrup:
Marc Hohl writes:
[...]
Looks like there is some sequential iterator consulted for
pending_moment that no longer has an iter_ to refer to.
More likely than not, one of the fixes f
Urs Liska writes:
> Thanks, that makes things clearer. This is definitely what I
> suggested. The "outer" slur is not a tie but a phrasing slur and the
> inner one a slur indicating the bowing.
That would not make much sense, really. Phrasing slurs in violin music
are only necessary when you c
Marc Hohl writes:
> Am 21.11.2015 um 10:53 schrieb David Kastrup:
>> Marc Hohl writes:
> [...]
>> Looks like there is some sequential iterator consulted for
>> pending_moment that no longer has an iter_ to refer to.
>>
>> More likely than not, one of the fixes for addlyrics going off the deep
>>
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> Agreed. Lilypond is still the best tool out there for my needs. I just
> wish I could do more, and more beautiful, engraving with a smaller
> investment of time and effort. (Isn’t that the eternal quest?)
Well, there is the related quest of making it a smaller investme
Hey,
thank you for the idea's. I thought I had to add an argument to the list,
but I'm not that advanced in using lilypond to implement it myself. With
this kind of solutions my understanding grows bit by bit :-) .
That other thread was very interesting for me indeed.
It works, great!
grtz,
Ba
41 matches
Mail list logo
