At 15:19 25/10/2015 -0500, David Wright wrote:
I'm glad we singers don't meet this sort of thing in "normal" music.
My own take is for having extra accidentals (ie clef
changes=>forget) but also the extra cancellations (1471). (Perhaps
written above.)
[from a position of ignorance of conventi
> On Oct 22, 2015, at 2:55 PM, ciconia wrote:
>
> I'm sure many would agree with me that your hard work (and indeed that of
> all lilypond contributors) is greatly appreciated.
+1
I hope this appeal will lead to a more financially viable situation that will
allow you to continue with your va
Hi,
can somebody tell me what happend to this topic:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Draft-Extended-mensural-notation-support-td172204.html
I have seen some discussion on devel and also some issues where code
related to this seems to be included in some 2.19 versions. But I could
not find i
Hi Abraham,
> There's not a convenient pango interface (yet) for selecting variants
> outside the Regular/Italic/Bold/Bold Italic styles.
That's a pity. But thanks for confirming it.
> However, with the way
> you are doing it, you should be able to just add "Semibold" to the original
> font nam
Dear Abraham,
> but I have great plans to remedy this situation. Please stay tuned!
That's good to hear that you are aware of it. I will stay tuned.
> Here are some test runs of what I've done (compared to Emmentaler, using
> the example from the LilyPond essay). They are definitely NOT perfect,
2015-10-25 21:33 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> 2015-10-25 13:00 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> 2015-10-25 8:34 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi Bernardo,
>
> please see attached. Does it fit your needs?
What's the essent
2015-10-25 13:00 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> 2015-10-25 8:34 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>>
Hi Bernardo,
please see attached. Does it fit your needs?
>>>
>>> What's the essential difference to the current code?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Davi
Quoting David Kastrup (d...@gnu.org):
> Noah Fields writes:
> > I am working on a score for solo viola. There are measures in which I
> > change from alto clef to treble clef, and then back to alto clef. Each time
> > there is a clef change, Lilypond rewrites accidentals. I understand the
> > usef
On Sun, Oct 25, 2015 at 08:15:49PM +0100, David Kastrup wrote:
> Paul Scott writes:
>
> > I get a segmentation fault from 2.19.29 that I don't get with
> > 2.19.28. I'm running 64-bit on Debian sid. It looks to be size
> > related so a minimal example doesn't seem to be relevant.
>
> Garbage c
Paul Scott writes:
> I get a segmentation fault from 2.19.29 that I don't get with
> 2.19.28. I'm running 64-bit on Debian sid. It looks to be size
> related so a minimal example doesn't seem to be relevant.
Garbage collection while slurs are being processed during the iteration
stage. Yes, s
Noah Fields writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I am working on a score for solo viola. There are measures in which I
> change from alto clef to treble clef, and then back to alto clef. Each time
> there is a clef change, Lilypond rewrites accidentals. I understand the
> usefulness of this default, but is ther
I get a segmentation fault from 2.19.29 that I don't get with
2.19.28. I'm running 64-bit on Debian sid. It looks to be size
related so a minimal example doesn't seem to be relevant.
I'd be happy to run any diagnostic that might help.
Paul
___
lily
Hi Noah,
I'm not really familiar with accidental styles (as the default is
perfectly fine for me).
But there's a 'manual' solution which works. I just can't say if it's
too much extra-input for your taste:
\version "2.18.2"
\relative c' {
\time 4/4
\clef "alto"
cis4
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2015-10-24 23:20 GMT+02:00 Thomas Morley :
>>
>> Well, it's not related to my changes, as far as I can tell. See:
>>
>> \markup {
>> \fret-diagram-verbose #'(
>> (place-fret 4 0)
>> )
>> }
>>
>> I could follow this one bac to 2.14.2, the oldest I've
Robert Schmaus writes:
> I can only subscribe to what Simon (and all other responders) wrote.
>
> Like Urs pointed out, that the absence of any reports about the
> financial situation on the developer side left me under the impression
> that it wasn't really problematic.
It means I don't want t
Jacques Menu writes:
> Hello folks,
>
> I’m only an amateur musician, but I really appreciate Lilypond’s
> availability. I haven’t been creating scores any other way since I
> first encountered it at the time of version 2.12.
>
> Current example : Bach’s Magnificat, in which I partly double the
>
Or shorter :
\version "2.19.29"
#(set-global-staff-size 15)
\paper {
indent = 0
ragged-right = ##f
}
xen = #(define-scheme-function (parser location music)
(ly:music?)
#{
\markup {
\with-dimensions #'(0 . 0) #'(0 . 0)
\score {
\magnifyMusic 0.8 { $music
Simon Albrecht writes:
> On 22.10.2015 19:21, David Kastrup wrote:
>> As you all know, my sole source of income are donations from happy
>> LilyPond users. It would appear that LilyPond users have stopped being
>> happy with my work.
>
> You must know that this is not the case. I should be much
Il giorno sab 24 ott 2015 alle 20:31, Thomas Morley
ha scritto:
Harm, should I enter an issue in the tracker for this? So if/when
you have
time to include it in LilyPond (as you said you'd like to do one
day) we'll
know it.
As a reminder, please do. Thanks.
Added:
https://sourceforge.ne
Hi Ryan,
As each note head has its proper alignment, I don't see how this can be
achieved without using markups.
Long work though...
Something like :
\version "2.19.29"
#(set-global-staff-size 15)
\paper {
indent = 0
ragged-right = ##f
}
\new PianoStaff \with {
\omit TimeSignature
\
Thomas Morley writes:
> 2015-10-25 8:34 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
>> Thomas Morley writes:
>>
>>> Hi Bernardo,
>>>
>>> please see attached. Does it fit your needs?
>>
>> What's the essential difference to the current code?
>>
>> --
>> David Kastrup
>
> Current `determine-frets' from scm/translat
On 25/10/15 11:08, Chris Yate wrote:
> As I understand it, there are some differences in the commission payable
> for sending money to a friend vs buying a thing, but I've not looked
> into it for a couple of years. We were investigating it for managing our
> orchestra subs - I think it was about £
Yes, naturally PayPal takes commission. So does your bank, any credit card
provider, WorldPay or Moneygram or any other similar service. However,
PayPal is secure and reliable enough for Amazon and a huge number of online
stores to be happy using it, not to mention charitable organizations that
ben
Hi all,
I am working on a score for solo viola. There are measures in which I
change from alto clef to treble clef, and then back to alto clef. Each time
there is a clef change, Lilypond rewrites accidentals. I understand the
usefulness of this default, but is there a way to turn this feature off?
2015-10-25 8:34 GMT+01:00 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi Bernardo,
>>
>> please see attached. Does it fit your needs?
>
> What's the essential difference to the current code?
>
> --
> David Kastrup
Current `determine-frets' from scm/translation-functions.scm checks
whether the ca
Brilliant Simon! 😊
And why would I need to hide a bar full of entries?
In improv pieces I often write all the material out sequencial in a score. Then
I choose what materiel the different players should use, and I hide the rest of
the bars.
That way I can have one score a piece, and the individua
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi Bernardo,
>
> please see attached. Does it fit your needs?
What's the essential difference to the current code?
--
David Kastrup
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/l
Using a grace note set that spans two staves, reduced from a vastly more
complex real score to a more minimal example, if I use a hairpin between the
sfz and the p indications, I get a programming error related to vertical
alignment that I am unable to understand, or eliminate. Can folks explain
Use X-offset for the stems.
For example:
\once \override Stem.X-offset = #n
where n is positive or negative.
Andrew
On 25 Oct 2015, at 17:48, Ryan Michael wrote:
I know there are ways in lilypond to not display the stem. I would
like to do something slightly different, which is to posit
29 matches
Mail list logo
