Hi Harm,
2015-01-15 3:22 GMT+01:00 Thomas Morley :
> foo =
> #(define-music-function (parser location mus)(ly:music?)
> (music-map
> (lambda (m)
> (if (music-is-of-type? m 'arpeggio-event)
> (make-music
> 'ArpeggioEvent
> 'tweaks
> (li
Hi Andrew,
I'd like to add two lines to your bash, but I need assistance:
After
lilypond "$file"
I'd like to burts the file into multiple pdfs (one per page) and I do this
by:
pdftk "$file".pdf burst
This makes one pdf file per page with the following output:
originalpdf.pdf
Hi Andrew,
this Bash is going to be VERY(!!!) useful for me, thank you VERY(!!!)
much for posting it,
Andrea
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Re-bottom-of-EPS-output-cut-off-size-of-PDF-files-tp170186p170496.html
Sent from the User mailing list archiv
2015-01-14 22:12 GMT+01:00 Noeck :
> Hi Abraham,
>
> Am 14.01.2015 um 17:24 schrieb tisimst:
>> P.S. I'm with Alistair, though. Is there any reason \arpeggioArrow[Up/Down]
>> isn't designed to work by itself rather than requiring another explicit
>> \arpeggio?
>
> I think, it is simply implemented
Hi David,
> I've never quite found the right term for this.
> 'Player' isn't bad, although I would also suggest considering the following:
> 'folder', 'chair', 'stand' or 'desk’.
But (as you go on to point out) a “folder", “stand", or “desk" could certainly
encompass more than one player — and
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 6:55 AM, Kieren MacMillan <
kieren_macmil...@sympatico.ca> wrote:
> > You want to write music as if it is for a single voice
> A single *player*…
A very interesting concept.
Trick question: where in lilypond is the concept of a 'player' modeled?
I've never quite found t
dear lilyponders:I run the following .ly file and got the following warning
error.1. how can the warning message be removed?Starting lilypond-windows.exe
2.19.15 [test_unfailing-love.ly]...Processing
`C:/Users/Tsang/Dropbox/Lyndon/choir/unfailing-love/test_unfailing-love.ly'Parsing...Interpreti
Hi John,
As a first workaround :
\version "2.19.15"
#(allow-volta-hook "|")
\relative c'' {
\key c \major \time 4/4
% Set details for later Text Spanner
\override TextSpanner #'(bound-details left text)
= \markup { \small \bold Slower }
% Place dynamics above staff
% Place following O
Hi Urs,
It works quite well (although it is not as precise as I would like). The
bars have "almost" the same size, so I guess I will settle for that
Urs Liska wrote
> Not my idea. I think I had it from Kieren (in a quite recent thread).
Well, thanks for pointing it out to me then!
Take care,
G
I have a piece which has a complex repeat. The first time through the first
two bars are omitted. The second time the notes bracketed [S] are played.
This entire sequence is then played again, however, the second time the
notes bracketed [D] are played. In total the line is played four times in
dif
Consider the following snippet and the attached graphic (--png) file it
generates:
\version "2.19.15"
\paper {ragged-last-bottom = ##f}
music = {
\mark \default \repeat unfold 8 s1
\break
\mark \default \repeat unfold 8 s1
\break
\mark \default \repeat unfo
Hi Abraham,
Am 14.01.2015 um 17:24 schrieb tisimst:
> P.S. I'm with Alistair, though. Is there any reason \arpeggioArrow[Up/Down]
> isn't designed to work by itself rather than requiring another explicit
> \arpeggio?
I think, it is simply implemented in analogy to all the other Up/Down/Neutral
se
Am 14.01.2015 um 21:43 schrieb Gilberto Agostinho:
Urs Liska wrote
What you *can* do is add a second layer with spacer rests and override
the minimal length of the MultiMeasureRest.
Oh, that's very clever Urs!
Not my idea. I think I had it from Kieren (in a quite recent thread).
I will giv
Urs Liska wrote
> What you *can* do is add a second layer with spacer rests and override
> the minimal length of the MultiMeasureRest.
Oh, that's very clever Urs! I will give it a try and see how it goes.
Thanks a lot for your reply, take care!
Gilberto
--
View this message in context:
http:
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 15:29 -0500, Hwaen Ch'uqi wrote:
> Greetings David,
>
> Is the command \markLengthOn possibly what you are looking for?
>
> Hwaen Ch'uqi
I don't think so, but thanks for the suggestion. The problem is not the
horizontal space occupied by the marks, but their vertical posit
Am 14.01.2015 um 21:35 schrieb Gilberto Agostinho:
Hello LilyPonders,
I composed my first piece in proportional notation using a constant
measurement of 1 second per bar (thus, each bar must always have the same
length throughout the whole score). The notes consist of noteheads only, no
flags,
Hello LilyPonders,
I composed my first piece in proportional notation using a constant
measurement of 1 second per bar (thus, each bar must always have the same
length throughout the whole score). The notes consist of noteheads only, no
flags, no beams, no stems, so the only reference for the play
Greetings David,
Is the command \markLengthOn possibly what you are looking for?
Hwaen Ch'uqi
On 1/14/15, David Sumbler wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 23:17 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
>> 2015-01-12 22:37 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler :
>> > The default position of tempo indications is, to my eye, r
On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 23:17 +0100, Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2015-01-12 22:37 GMT+01:00 David Sumbler :
> > The default position of tempo indications is, to my eye, rather too
> > close to whatever is beneath them, be it a stave, a note or a slur.
> >
> > I have tried experimenting with
> >
> > \overr
tisimst and Hwaen - Thanks for your replies. Like may things, the answer is
simple once it is pointed out to you.
Alistair
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/arpeggioArrowUp-tp170464p170478.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
___
Or even :
%%
\version "2.19.15"
{
c1
\break
\tweak X-offset #6
\mark\markup\bold\fontsize #-2 "Presto"
\once\override Score.MetronomeMark.Y-offset = #13
\tempo "" 2 = 130
c1
}
%%
Pierre
2015-01-14 18:20 GMT+01:00 Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.p
Hi Jacques,
How about :
%%
\version "2.19.15"
{
c1
\break
\tempo \markup\concat {
\column { \vspace #3 "Presto" }
\hspace #-8
}
2 = 130
c1
}
%%
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-14 17:51 GMT+01:00 Menu Jacques :
> Hello folks,
>
> Following the answer
Hello folks,
Following the answer to a question I got recentlty from this list, I’ve come to:
%%
\version "2.19.15"
{
c1
\break
\tempo\markup{
\column{
" " \vspace #2
"Presto"
}
} 2 = 130
c1
}
%%
How can I align the metronome indication
Ok, I understand.
I remember doing this few years ago for grace, beams and other stettings
such as \super etc. but I quit because it was a headache when upgrading.
Cheers,
Pierre
2015-01-14 17:16 GMT+01:00 Chris Trahan :
> Pierre,
>
> Yes, that is what I modified. I know that I will need to mod
Hi Abraham,
2015-01-14 15:24 GMT+01:00 tisimst :
> Pierre,
>
> I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with what Chris did, as
> long is it works. In general, I think you are right because we know that
> the default code in titling-init.ly works un-modified, then it probably
> should not
Could you send us a tiny example ?
2015-01-14 12:41 GMT+01:00 Omer Katzir :
> Thank you, Pierre, however, I can't seem to move the "medium" to bass
> staff, when I'm trying too all I get is dots in the tablature.
>
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 10:24 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider
> wrote:
> > Hi Omer,
Johan Vromans wrote
> It works for many structure-related items but unfortunately not for
> repeats.
Sure it does! LP doesn't force the repeat structure into simultaneous voices
(maybe it should, maybe it shouldn't). The user just needs to be more
diligent to put \repeats in the other voices, too.
Greetings Alistair,
The solution is actually quite simple. \arpeggioArrowUp is an override
setting of \arpeggio, so it must be entered before the chord you want
arpeggiated. Then, append \arpeggio to your chord, and all should be
fine. But remember then to revert to the arpeggio default with
\arpe
Alistair Millar wrote
> I hope this is enough. Thanks
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \language "english"
>
> \relative c'
>
> {
> \clef "treble"
> \time 4/4
> \key g \major
>
>
>
> 4\arpeggio
>
>
> 4\arpeggioArrowUp
>
> \bar "|."
>
> }
Alistair,
It does work, just not in the
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 2:45 AM, Pierre Perol-Schneider <
pierre.schneider.pa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> Do you mean that you modifed titling-init.ly ?
> If yes, I don't think it is a good idea...
>
> How about :
>
> \version "2.18.2"
>
> \paper {
> oddHeaderMarkup = \markup\on-the-fly
I hope this is enough. Thanks
\version "2.18.2"
\language "english"
\relative c'
{
\clef "treble"
\time 4/4
\key g \major
4\arpeggio
4\arpeggioArrowUp
\bar "|."
}
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/arpeggioArrowUp-tp170464p170466.html
S
- Original Message -
From: "Alistair Millar"
To:
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 3:40 PM
Subject: arpeggioArrowUp
Can anyone tell me why \arpeggio works OK but \arpeggioArrowUp does not?
When
I use it, no arpeggio line is displayed, not even one without an arrow.
Thanks
Alistair M
Can anyone tell me why \arpeggio works OK but \arpeggioArrowUp does not? When
I use it, no arpeggio line is displayed, not even one without an arrow.
Thanks
Alistair Millar
Edinburgh
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/arpeggioArrowUp-tp170464.html
Sent from t
Hi David,
> You want to write music as if it is for a single voice
A single *player*…
> You are essentially writing polyphonic material (albeit, one voice is playing
> rests at any one time.)
That’s a valid, but non-intuitive, way of looking at it… I like your
outside-the-box thinking! =)
>
Thanks, that helps.
Knute Snortum
(via Gmail)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:57 PM, David Nalesnik
wrote:
> One more thing...
>
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 5:55 PM, David Nalesnik
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> \shape #'( ((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
>> ((0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0) (0 . 0))
Pierre,
I don't think there's anything inherently wrong with what Chris did, as
long is it works. In general, I think you are right because we know
that the default code in titling-init.ly works un-modified, then it
probably should not be changed, just for that sake. However, if someone
doesn'
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 13:56 CET, Urs Liska
schrieb:
> OK, I see.
> But somehow it feels wrong that
>
> #(display annotation? some-obj)
>
> doesn't produce #t but the content of "location".
> Should I ignore that feeling?
If you intended to write
#(display (annotation? some-obj))
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 12:34 CET, Urs Liska
schrieb:
>
> >>> #(define (annotation? obj)
> >>> (and
> >>> (list? obj)
> >>> (every pair? obj)
> >>> (if (assoc-ref obj "type") #t #f)
> >>> (if (assoc-ref obj "location") #t #f)))
> > ... and is this just equiva
Johan Vromans squirrel.nl> writes:
> In fact, this is separation of content and structure. It works for many
> structure-related items but unfortunately not for repeats.
>
> For example, in the following snippet the score looks right, but in the
> midi the repeats are not unfolded. Do you have a
Am 14.01.2015 um 12:42 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 12:34 CET, Urs Liska
schrieb:
#(define (annotation? obj)
(and
(list? obj)
(every pair? obj)
(if (assoc-ref obj "type") #t #f)
(if (assoc-ref obj "location") #t #f)))
... and is this just e
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 12:34 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 14.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Richard Shann:
> > On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:29 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> >> Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
> >>>
> >>> Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska
> >>> schrieb:
> >>>
>
Am 14.01.2015 um 12:28 schrieb Richard Shann:
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:29 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska schrieb:
Yes, I made some surprising progress with Scheme recently. I didn't even
get stuck in the
On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 11:29 +0100, Urs Liska wrote:
> Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
> >
> > Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska
> > schrieb:
> >
> >> Yes, I made some surprising progress with Scheme recently. I didn't even
> >> get stuck in the ands and parens in the
anders,
you're welcome. :)
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 7:08 PM, and...@andis59.se
wrote:
> There's more than one way to skin a cat'
welcome to the wonderful world of lilypond. there are always many ways to
get the results you need. you'll just have to find the one that works best
for you. :)
reg
Am 14.01.2015 um 11:18 schrieb Mattes:
Am Mittwoch, 14. Januar 2015 09:42 CET, Urs Liska schrieb:
Yes, I made some surprising progress with Scheme recently. I didn't even
get stuck in the ands and parens in the actual predicate I wrote
#(define (annotation? obj)
(and
(and (lis
Works brilliantly. Many thanks!
On Wed Jan 14 2015 at 6:54:07 PM Thomas Morley
wrote:
> 2015-01-14 7:01 GMT+01:00 Craig Dabelstein :
> > My saviour! Thanks for your help.
> >
> > I now have my layout block looking like this (below), but I was
> wondering if
> > there is a way to incorporate this
2015-01-14 10:16 GMT+01:00 Urs Liska :
> If I have a Scheme object like
>
>
> (#)
>
>
> how can I retrieve "DynamicText" as a string?
>
> TIA
>
>
> Urs
Hi Urs,
try
#(define grob-name
(lambda (x)
(if (ly:grob? x)
(assq-ref (ly:grob-property x 'meta) 'name)
(ly:error "~a is
James and Phil,
I know, it’s a bit late to join the party — but better late than never! ;)
I experimented a bit with org-babel-lilypond (version 7.9.3f) in basic mode and
it looks like -dpreview is not absolutely necessary to automatically trim
images in org-mode. I didn’t have to manipulate my
If I have a Scheme object like
(#)
how can I retrieve "DynamicText" as a string?
TIA
Urs
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
2015-01-14 7:01 GMT+01:00 Craig Dabelstein :
> My saviour! Thanks for your help.
>
> I now have my layout block looking like this (below), but I was wondering if
> there is a way to incorporate this code into the layout block as well:
>
> \markLengthOn
> \compressFullBarRests
>
> % rehearsal lette
Hi Chris,
Do you mean that you modifed titling-init.ly ?
If yes, I don't think it is a good idea...
How about :
\version "2.18.2"
\paper {
oddHeaderMarkup = \markup\on-the-fly #not-part-first-page
\fill-line {
\null
\fromproperty #'header:title
\on-the-fly \print-page-nu
Am 14.01.2015 um 04:08 schrieb Paul Morris:
Urs Liska wrote
Now I've checked - it's perfect. Thank you again!
There is no alist? predicate, but it's very easy to define:
#(define (alist? lst)
(and (list? lst)
(every pair? lst)))
Glad to help and glad someone else is benefiti
Hi Anders,
I'm thinking about putting a dedicated snippet to the LSR.
Would you be so kind to scan and send us a short piece (like 8 to 12
measures) with all usual notation (pedals, glissandi, slurs, bends, etc.) ;
I could'nt find any nice pedal steel score on the net.
Thanks in advance,
Pierre
_
Hi Omer,
See:
- http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Changing-Tuning-tc163390.html
- http://lsr.di.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=920
HTH,
Pierre
2015-01-14 9:15 GMT+01:00 Omer Katzir :
> Hello everyone,
>
> Several months ago you helped me created two templates, one for 10
> course lute with french tab
Hello everyone,
Several months ago you helped me created two templates, one for 10
course lute with french tablature and the second was for 7 course lute
with french tablature.
My old iMac died and I lost both and was only able to restore the 10
course template from the group archive and I will l
55 matches
Mail list logo
