>> It would be nice, yes, but certain properties can't be set to a
>> procedure. [...]
>
> Huh, I remember something like that. At some point of time, we
> probably should see whether it is possible to do something about
> that. But it was sort of non-trivial if I remember correctly.
Do we hav
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:32 PM, Do something Artistic <
vegasart...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Trying to change meters in one line of an SATB score without changing all
> of the lines.
>
> Tried to just go unmetered but that didn't seem to work.
>
> Thank you,
>
> Spencer
>
>
Hopefully, this is what
At 20:10 on 02 Aug 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
>Mark Knoop writes:
>
>> Through experimentation I have discovered that tweaks are effective
>> in quoted cues, however overrides do not work. It is possible to make
>> overrides work by adding StreamEvent to quotedCueEventTypes, however
>> this brings
Trying to change meters in one line of an SATB score without changing all of
the lines.
Tried to just go unmetered but that didn't seem to work.
Thank you,
Spencer ___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypon
At 20:10 on 02 Aug 2014, David Kastrup wrote:
>Mark Knoop writes:
>
>> Through experimentation I have discovered that tweaks are effective
>> in quoted cues, however overrides do not work. It is possible to make
>> overrides work by adding StreamEvent to quotedCueEventTypes, however
>> this brings
Thanks for looking into this - perhaps this explains why such a large
triangle is used for the major 7th, it looks unusual. Perhaps the
original intent was for something smaller but it got altered by the
baseline-skip factor not being what the designer had in mind.
I have realized that I can use th
Do something Artistic writes:
>
> From: vegasart...@hotmail.com
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Meter change in one vocal line of SATB score
> Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 01:21:02 -0700
>
>
>
>
> Trying to change meters in one line of an SATB score without changing
> all of the lines.
>
> Tr
http://lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
From: vegasart...@hotmail.com
To: lilypond-user@gnu.org
Subject: Meter change in one vocal line of SATB score
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 01:21:02 -0700
Trying to change meters in one line of an SATB score without changing all of
the lines.
Tried to just go unmetered but that didn't seem to wor
On 02/08/2014 11:40 AM, Br. Samuel Springuel wrote:
I just tested the work around noted in the issue tracker and want to add
that said work around ignores the relative includes option in the
lilypond files, i.e., "#(ly:set-option 'relative-includes #t)" at the
beginning of the file.
Thus, to mak
Mark Knoop writes:
> Through experimentation I have discovered that tweaks are effective in
> quoted cues, however overrides do not work. It is possible to make
> overrides work by adding StreamEvent to quotedCueEventTypes, however
> this brings with it additional events such as slurs and dynamic
David Nalesnik writes:
> It would be nice, yes, but certain properties can't be set to a procedure.
>
> Compare:
>
> \version "2.19.10"
>
> {
> \override NoteHead.font-size = 5
> c''4
> }
>
> {
> \override NoteHead.font-size = #(lambda (grob) 5)
> c''4
> }
>
>
> The second has no effect.
Asked for an issue on the error message that should be a warning.
Any more discussion on these?
1) The workaround causes the hairpin to be shorter than it should be.
Either
a) Allow both dynamics and (de)crescendos on the same event, or
b) Have LilyPond set a reasonable default dynamic, such
Through experimentation I have discovered that tweaks are effective in
quoted cues, however overrides do not work. It is possible to make
overrides work by adding StreamEvent to quotedCueEventTypes, however
this brings with it additional events such as slurs and dynamics which
are not desired.
Is
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 10:17 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
>
> Can you please use more descriptive subject lines? You don't even refer
> to a previous posting.
>
> Patrick or Cynthia Karl writes:
>
> > I frequently need do something like: in
> > order to show that one of the two notes is preferred,
2014-07-30 9:56 GMT+02:00 David Kastrup :
> Use a larger baseline-skip.
>
Thanks David.
Actually I do understand the concept but have no idea how to translate it
to LP.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/
Hi,
2014-08-02 17:13 GMT+02:00 Patrick or Cynthia Karl :
> What I would like to do is substitute for the "-2" the value "fontSize-2".
> Is this possible? If so,how?
>
\version "2.18.2"
mySize = -3
\relative c'' {
\once\set fontSize = \mySize
}
HTH,
Pierre
_
I just tested the work around noted in the issue tracker and want to add
that said work around ignores the relative includes option in the
lilypond files, i.e., "#(ly:set-option 'relative-includes #t)" at the
beginning of the file.
Thus, to make it work with my example where the lilypond files
Can you please use more descriptive subject lines? You don't even refer
to a previous posting.
Patrick or Cynthia Karl writes:
> I frequently need do something like: in
> order to show that one of the two notes is preferred, but the other
> one is acceptable. The problem is that the "-2" in
Sorry for the poor Subject.
On Aug 2, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Patrick or Cynthia Karl wrote:
>
> I frequently need do something like: in order to
> show that one of the two notes is preferred, but the other one is acceptable.
> The problem is that the "-2" in the \tweak command is an absolute va
PS: if you want some excerpts of those scores, just let me know!
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Where-to-Download-the-New-Music-Fonts-tp165035p165242.html
Sent from the User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
I frequently need do something like: in order to
show that one of the two notes is preferred, but the other one is acceptable.
The problem is that the "-2" in the \tweak command is an absolute value, i.e.,
it is not relative to the fontSize being used. If the fontSize were -3, e.g.,
then t
Knute Snortum writes:
> I ran into this issue again recently. Something that is seen a lot in 19th
> and 20th century music is a crescendo or decrescendo without going to a
> specific dynamic. The performer is given the freedom to decide how much to
> change the dynamics. This causes an error
I ran into this issue again recently. Something that is seen a lot in 19th
and 20th century music is a crescendo or decrescendo without going to a
specific dynamic. The performer is given the freedom to decide how much to
change the dynamics. This causes an error message: "programming error:
Imp
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 4:02 AM, Urs Liska wrote:
Just one question before I can make a patch from this: which Lilypond
version is this file derived from? (I need to know that in order not
to discard any work others may have done in that file).
Urs
I'm using 2.18.2. Sorry for not putting th
Just one question before I can make a patch from this: which Lilypond version
is this file derived from? (I need to know that in order not to discard any
work others may have done in that file).
Urs
Urs
On 1. August 2014 21:46:13 MESZ, Abraham Lee wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:07 PM, Urs
>Error on running convert-ly
I enclose the snippet for the above problem. This also includes the
"point-and-click" option which has also stopped functioning. All other
aspects of the Lilypond Tool seem to function normally and I can still
create music. The update was from 2.18.0 and as you can see
27 matches
Mail list logo
