Frescobaldi/LilyPond timelapse video

Nice! I tended to pay attention to the changes in the output which kept me from seeing what was happening on the input side...I guess I could watch again with different focus but it might be hard... I agree slower would be better. Nice wallpaper, btw! -- Tim Reeves timothyrree...@gmail.com __

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

On 10 Apr 2013, at 11:38 , Martin Tarenskeen wrote: Just like my lilypond scores I often still write (simple) html code using just Vim. Maybe I'm just getting old and old fashioned :-) +1, we're not alone.. Regards, Wim. ___ lilypond-user m

Re: call for italian users: translation of "feathered beams" and other terms

2013/4/10 Davide Liessi > > direct > I can't understand this glossary entry, since there isn't enough context. > I don't think it is specifically a musical term, and I couldn't find > occurrences of "direct" in NR with a different meaning from the usual, > literal, common one. > Why is "direct" i

Re: Frescobaldi/LilyPond timelapse video

Le mercredi 10/04/13 à 22h18, Federico Bruni a écrit : > maybe too fast to be understandable I guess one is supposed to be replay at a lower speed if he's interested in some point. -- Denis ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https:/

Re: Frescobaldi/LilyPond timelapse video

Am 10.04.2013 22:18, schrieb Federico Bruni: 2013/4/10 Francisco Vila > I wanted to share this screencast with you. Duration: 1'29'' at 25x speed. http://lilypond.es/lilypond/timelapse-screencast/timelapse-aquaplane.webm also available as http

Re: Frescobaldi/LilyPond timelapse video

2013/4/10 Francisco Vila > I wanted to share this screencast with you. Duration: 1'29'' at 25x speed. > > http://lilypond.es/lilypond/timelapse-screencast/timelapse-aquaplane.webm > also available as > http://lilypond.es/lilypond/timelapse-screencast/timelapse-aquaplane.mp4 > > It shows trial and

Re: Macro not working with 2.16

2013/4/10 SoundsFromSound : > Hi Alberto, > > What does your macro do exactly? Just curious, thanks! It's a substitution-function (see: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/extending/intermediate-substitution-functions ) for `measurePosition' (see Nr 1.2.6: http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.17/

Re: Macro not working with 2.16

Hi Alberto, What does your macro do exactly? Just curious, thanks! Looks nice! Alberto Simões-2 wrote > Hello > > Some time ago (years probably) somebody in this list helped me with this > macro, for \inline that work anywhere in the music: > > > partialInline = #(define-music-function >

Re: Cropped output (à la -dpreview) possiblein Finale and Sibelius

- Original Message - From: "Francisco Vila" To: "Phil Holmes" Cc: "LilyPond-User list" ; "David Kastrup" Sent: Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:20 AM Subject: Re: Cropped output (à la -dpreview) possiblein Finale and Sibelius 2013/4/9 Phil Holmes : I commented in an earlier message tha

Re: Vocal music sheet - hyphens wrongly engraved

2013/4/10 Jun Wang : > Hi Phil > > I tried nwc2ly, the converted lilypond file version is 2.15.26. and It gave > some syntax error under my 2.16.2 system. > Any way to convert 2.15.26 to my current version or I have install a old > version? sure, just use convert-ly: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/

Re: Cropped output (à la -dpreview) possible in Finale and Sibelius

Carl Peterson writes: > On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > > Carl Peterson writes: > > > I'm not an expert on GhostScript, but in practice it is nearly > always > > best to rasterize vector graphics at the intended output > resolution. > >

Re: Macro not working with 2.16

Alberto Simões writes: > Hello > > Some time ago (years probably) somebody in this list helped me with > this macro, for \inline that work anywhere in the music: > > Now I get some complains with 2.16: If you had upgraded your files/macro using convert-ly, everything should have worked fine. co

Re: Cropped output (à la -dpreview) possible in Finale and Sibelius

On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 4:45 PM, David Kastrup wrote: > Carl Peterson writes: > > > I'm not an expert on GhostScript, but in practice it is nearly always > > best to rasterize vector graphics at the intended output resolution. > > Except when it isn't. What makes you think that the PDF viewers a

Re: Macro not working with 2.16

Hello, Jan-Peter On 10/04/13 14:01, Jan-Peter Voigt wrote: Hello Alberto, the change was introduced in 2.13 or 2.15(?). If you remove the dollar signs inside the scheme expression ($nom -> nom) (but not inside the lily code $mus), it should work: #{ \set Score.measurePosition = #(ly:make-momen

Re: Macro not working with 2.16

Hello Alberto, the change was introduced in 2.13 or 2.15(?). If you remove the dollar signs inside the scheme expression ($nom -> nom) (but not inside the lily code $mus), it should work: #{ \set Score.measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment (- nom) den) $mus #} HTH Jan-Peter Am 10.04.2013 14:50,

Macro not working with 2.16

Hello Some time ago (years probably) somebody in this list helped me with this macro, for \inline that work anywhere in the music: partialInline = #(define-music-function (parser location nom den mus) (integer? integer? ly:music?) #{ \set Score.measurePosition = #(ly:make-mome

RE: Vocal music sheet - hyphens wrongly engraved

Hi Phil I tried nwc2ly, the converted lilypond file version is 2.15.26. and It gave some syntax error under my 2.16.2 system.Any way to convert 2.15.26 to my current version or I have install a old version? ThanksJun From: m...@philholmes.net To: wj1...@hotmail.com; lilypond-user@gnu.org Subjec

Frescobaldi/LilyPond timelapse video

Hello, I wanted to share this screencast with you. Duration: 1'29'' at 25x speed. http://lilypond.es/lilypond/timelapse-screencast/timelapse-aquaplane.webm also available as http://lilypond.es/lilypond/timelapse-screencast/timelapse-aquaplane.mp4 It shows trial and error, browsing manuals, pause

Re: call for italian users: translation of "feathered beams" and other terms

Ciao Federico, as in my previous email, >> Unreferenced statements are my personal opinions. >> Sources: >> [G] = "Enciclopedia della Musica", Garzanti, Milano, 1996 [C] = Sandro Carnelos, "Gli organi della diocesi di Vittorio Veneto", Vittorio Veneto, 2000 (a book that lists characteristics of e

Re: musicxml2ly enhancements

>%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) >>> >>> Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at >>> every line. Really? It's like having a BASIC program which always sta

RE: musicxml2ly enhancements

%{ 5 %} a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | instead. I like that. It's tedious to type manually, but a computer program doesn't know that word :-) Indeed, but i find it unreadable, especially if it was placed at every line. In general I think tools like musicxml2ly and other programs that convert

RE: musicxml2ly enhancements

How about allowing bar numbers as a letter+number, parsed similar to musical note+duration: B78 a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 | B79 e,4 ( f4 ) ( g4 ) a4 | Perhaps they could also double as bar checks: B78 a,4 ( a4 ) ( b4 ) d4 B79 e,4 ( f4 ) ( g4 ) a4 Or alternately, augment

Re: Cropped output (à la -dpreview) possiblein Finale and Sibelius

2013/4/10 Francisco Vila : > It must have been downsampled at some stage. I see stairs at 100% (1:1 > to screen) Hm, probably I should see stairs in either case because pixels of my screen are bigger than cone cells of my retina, so to speak, but now I think I see them because the image is pure b/

Re: Cropped output (à la -dpreview) possiblein Finale and Sibelius

2013/4/9 Phil Holmes : > I commented in an earlier message that Sibelius, IMHO, produces witheringly > appalling graphics output. Unaliased, with stems that attach to noteheads > poorly. The image I attached earlier was not scanned, but used Sibelius's > export to PNG function at nominal 300 dpi.