Noeck writes:
> Or, just as a slight variation: if you want to minimize the code needed
> within the music, you can put the override in the command:
>
> breatheFermata = {
> \once \override BreathingSign.text = \markup {
> \combine
> \musicglyph #"scripts.rcomma"
> \raise #1
> \
Nick Payne writes:
> 4 c-4
>
> then if I use
>
> \remove "New_fingering_engraver"
>
> it removes the fingering on the first C (i.e. the chord) and leaves
> the fingering on the second. If I use
>
> \remove "Fingering_engraver"
>
> it doesn't remove the fingering on either note.
Yes, it does. An
On 17/02/13 09:59, Eluze wrote:
Nick Payne-3 wrote
Just curious - the Internals Reference says that fingering is in the
Voice context, but when I remove it I still see fingering. I would have
expected the code below to remove the fingering, but it doesn't. I'd
like to be able to publish a finger
Or, just as a slight variation: if you want to minimize the code needed
within the music, you can put the override in the command:
breatheFermata = {
\once \override BreathingSign.text = \markup {
\combine
\musicglyph #"scripts.rcomma"
\raise #1
\musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata"
Nick Payne-3 wrote
> Just curious - the Internals Reference says that fingering is in the
> Voice context, but when I remove it I still see fingering. I would have
> expected the code below to remove the fingering, but it doesn't. I'd
> like to be able to publish a fingered score without fingeri
Just curious - the Internals Reference says that fingering is in the
Voice context, but when I remove it I still see fingering. I would have
expected the code below to remove the fingering, but it doesn't. I'd
like to be able to publish a fingered score without fingering for those
who prefer to
On 16/02/13 23:17, Colin Hall wrote:
Nick Payne writes:
On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
Fingering.add-stem-support
Helge Kruse-4 wrote
> But there is one note that requires this <<{}\\{}>> construct, doesn't
> it? In this case Lilypond doesn't find a good slope for the second beam.
> How can this be solved? I already tried to write a similar <{}\\{}>>
> construct in the lower stuff. But it didn't help.
>
>
I have a new variant of cross-staff notes. When I omit the H in the
upper staff and don't use polyphon music it looks quite nice, needs just
some tweeks with dumping and so.
But there is one note that requires this <<{}\\{}>> construct, doesn't
it? In this case Lilypond doesn't find a good slo
Jay Hamilton-3 wrote
> Is there a 'simple' way to get a fermata over the breathe comma?
you can change the "text" of the breathing sine:
breatheFermata = \markup {
\combine
\musicglyph #"scripts.rcomma"
\raise #1
\musicglyph #"scripts.ufermata"
}
\relative {
c c \once \override Breathin
Have you tried using s32*0? That should at least take care of the timing
problem.
HTH
Nick
On Feb 16, 2013 11:47 AM, "Jay Hamilton" wrote:
> Is there a 'simple' way to get a fermata over the breathe comma? I.E. I
> suspect that using an s32 might MIGHT work but then in compiling lily
> thinks t
Is there a 'simple' way to get a fermata over the breathe comma? I.E. I
suspect that using an s32 might MIGHT work but then in compiling lily
thinks the measure count is all screwed up.
Thanks
Jay
--
Jay Hamilton Sound and Silence www.soundand.com 206-328-7694
___
No Message
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Nick Payne writes:
> On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
>> Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
>>
>>> To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
>>> the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
>>> Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and
Nick Payne writes:
> The default positioning of the small "8" under the clef symbol when
> using the treble_8 or G_8 clef is too far to the right. It looks better
> when the X-offset is about 0.7 staff units:
>
> %
> \version "2.17.10"
>
> \relative c'{
>\clef "G_8"
>\overri
Javier Ruiz-Alma writes:
> I need to place markup between the staves, best centered at the
> barline.
> How is this accomplished?
>
> %%% BEGIN LILY CODE SNIPPET
>
> \version "2.16.1"
> <<
> \new staff {
> c''1
> \mark \markup{
> \override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5)
> \abs-fontsize #10
> \colum
I need to place markup between the staves, best centered at the barline.
How is this accomplished?
%%% BEGIN LILY CODE SNIPPET
\version "2.16.1"
<<
\new staff {
c''1
\mark \markup{
\override #'(baseline-skip . 1.5)
\abs-fontsize #10
\co
17 matches
Mail list logo
