Hello all,
I'm creating piano music for someone and the recipient reviewed the
score and asked for changes. Despite my best efforts, I haven't been
able to make the requested changes without some help. Can someone
help with the following changes:
(1) in a piano staff context, we'd like to incr
David Nalesnik writes:
> (I'm trying an example given here:
> http://jayreynoldsfreeman.com/Aux/Tutorials/Modifying%20Lists.html)
>
> I don't understand this--because clearly using set-car! and set-cdr!
> with a constant led to problems within the engraver; why will the
> sandbox allow me to do t
Nick Payne internode.on.net> writes:
> if you change ragged-bottom and ragged-last-bottom to
> ##t, the console outputs two identical warnings: "warning: cannot fit
> music on page: ragged-spacing was requested, but page was compressed",
> and the output is now over three pages, with four syst
Kieren MacMillan sympatico.ca> writes:
> In the docs, it says “The ly:minimal-breaking function performs minimal
computations to calculate the
> page breaking: it fills a page with as many systems as possible before moving
to the next one.”
> Can anyone explain what the algorithm is supposed t
On 11/12/12 14:19, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi all,
In the docs, it says “The ly:minimal-breaking function performs minimal
computations to calculate the page breaking: it fills a page with as many
systems as possible before moving to the next one.”
This does not seem to be the case.
It would
Hi all,
In the docs, it says “The ly:minimal-breaking function performs minimal
computations to calculate the page breaking: it fills a page with as many
systems as possible before moving to the next one.”
This does not seem to be the case.
It would be difficult to provide a minimal example, b
David,
On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 12:34 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
> David Nalesnik writes:
>
>> It turns out that the my definition of event-drul as '(() . ()) was
>> the problem. I substituted (cons '() '()) and everything works just
>> fine...even with the file that gave you the issues with multip
2012/12/11 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng :
> Hello,
> I just finished a song for an enterprise. But the problem is very strange
> even after I learned the manual. The first 16 bars has 2 verses, then there
> are two alternatives. At first, the words couldn't match the music, and now,
> after removing \autoBea
Hello,
I just finished a song for an enterprise. But the problem is very strange
even after I learned the manual. The first 16 bars has 2 verses, then there are
two alternatives. At first, the words couldn't match the music, and now, after
removing \autoBeamOff, I can't find any words in the p
Some form of templating outside Lilypond could potentially be useful,
eg stringtemplate.org which is my personal favourite; never used it
with Lilypond though.
Lilypond variables of course.
Bigger than ben hur from the get go might be daunting/ frustrating
learning experience.
Write up your firs
2012/12/11 Olivier Biot :
> On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Thomas Morley
> wrote:
>>
>> 2012/12/6 Thomas Morley :
>>
>> %% Using a value > 250 will place the DynamicText *inside* the
>> %% TupletBracket, depends on what you want.
>> \override TupletBracket #'outside-staff-priority =
On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Thomas Morley <
thomasmorle...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> 2012/12/6 Thomas Morley :
%% Using a value > 250 will place the DynamicText *inside* the
> %% TupletBracket, depends on what you want.
> \override TupletBracket #'outside-staff-priority = #250
>
On Tue, Dec 4, 2012 at 7:47 PM, Eluze wrote:
> shutterfreak wrote
> > Dear all,
> >
> > As a follow-up, here's another snippet featuring the same or similar
> > behavior. I haven't found the way to solve this problem yet.
> >
> > % BEGIN snippet 2
> > \version "2.16.1"
>
> this is a known bug - s
> \begin{lilypond}
> \relative c' {
> c2 e2 \times 2/3 { f8 a b } a2 e4
> }
> \end{lilypond}
> Options are put in brackets.
> \end{document}
The above code is not running with Lilypond-book 2.16.1 (XP and Windows 8)
The same example is running with Version 2.16
2012/12/10 Werner :
>> Yes this is the latest version of Jay's Merge Rests Engraver, combining
>> features of LSR #336 and #468.
>>
>> I made a request to have this included directly into LilyPond.
>> This is tacked as issue #1228.
>> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1228
>
> Than
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Keith OHara wrote:
> Xavier Noria hashref.com> writes:
>
> > > subtitle = \markup { "Part for" \concat{"E"\flat} "saxaphone"}
> >
> > That would be a nice touch. The flat looks weird over here though (see
> > attachment), is there an alternate markup I could
Xavier Noria hashref.com> writes:
>
> On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
>
> > I think so, mostly. Maybe put an extra set of {} around \addlyrics,
> > just in case you forget how \addlyrics works (like I often do).
> and don't quite understand that remark. Guess it has to do
I am using a recent development snapshot of GNU Emacs (version 24.3.50.1) and
the lilypond-mode.el distributed with LilyPond version 2.16 and 2.17. The emacs
function compile-internal has been deprecated/obsolete for some time now, and it
has been removed entirely from Emacs 24.3. As a result, Lil
Thomas,
Yep, that does exactly the right thing. Had to wait for the debian
experimental package to compile :(
To summarise (in case someone should do a search): Doing a \set
stanza={\dynamic "*"} inline with the lyricmode produces exactly the right
results for dynamic markings. It's probably an
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 12:13 AM, Keith OHara wrote:
> I think so, mostly. Maybe put an extra set of {} around \addlyrics,
> just in case you forget how \addlyrics works (like I often do).
I have checked the docs for lyrics in
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.12/Documentation/user/lilypond/Enter
Hi all,
In the following snippet, you can see a [minor] effect of one of the [major]
lyric text problems that Janek was hoping to fix with his GSoC work, and a
partial quick-and-dirty hack:
\version "2.17.8"
eighthNotes = \relative c' {
\time 12/8
\repeat "unfold" 9 { c8 } c4 r8
}
syllabl
- Original Message -
From: "Keith OHara"
To:
Sent: Monday, December 10, 2012 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: Programming error message
Eluze gmail.com> writes:
Phil Burfitt wrote
> programming error: cannot evaluate "head-separation-default" in module
> I had previously been running 2.13
Richard Shann writes:
> Thank you very much for this answer. One minor puzzle: what is the
> hyphen doing before \tweak in these examples?
> I have tried the same script with and without the hyphen and (on 2.16.0)
> I get the same pdf.
> That is, this seems to work just fine:
>
> <>\tweak #'ext
Thank you very much for this answer. One minor puzzle: what is the
hyphen doing before \tweak in these examples?
I have tried the same script with and without the hyphen and (on 2.16.0)
I get the same pdf.
That is, this seems to work just fine:
<>\tweak #'extra-offset #'(0 . 2) ^\markup {"pizz."
> Yes this is the latest version of Jay's Merge Rests Engraver, combining
> features of LSR #336 and #468.
>
> I made a request to have this included directly into LilyPond.
> This is tacked as issue #1228.
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1228
Thank you for the hints.
The sni
Hello,
I am just beginning to work on large, complex projects (e.g. multi-movement
scores with chorus and orchestra, with extensive tagging) in Lilypond, and
would like to get up to speed on current techniques for structuring
projects, such as producing multiple editions/versions from central sour
Peter Gentry wrote
> Eluze
>
> Your solution produced this error - where did I go wrong?
>
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.16.0 [tweak.ly]...
wrong version - in 2.16.x you need
- \tweak #'color #red
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Two-bits-of
"Peter Gentry" writes:
> Eluze
>
> Your solution produced this error - where did I go wrong?
>
> Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.16.0 [tweak.ly]...
^^
> Processing `C:/Users/Peter/LilyPool/Trials/Testing/tweak.ly'
> Parsing...
> C:/Users/Peter/LilyPool/Trials/T
Eluze
Your solution produced this error - where did I go wrong?
Starting lilypond-windows.exe 2.16.0 [tweak.ly]...
Processing `C:/Users/Peter/LilyPool/Trials/Testing/tweak.ly'
Parsing...
C:/Users/Peter/LilyPool/Trials/Testing/tweak.ly:5:17: error: wrong type for
argument 2. Expecting symbol, fo
Richard Shann wrote
> I wonder if there is a way of creating several pieces of markup text at
> a point in the music and tweaking their positions independently...
>
>
> \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 10) <>-\markup {"pizz."}
> \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -10)<>-\mar
Richard Shann writes:
> I wonder if there is a way of creating several pieces of markup text at
> a point in the music and tweaking their positions independently...
>
>
> \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 10) <>-\markup {"pizz."}
> \override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -10)<>-\m
Michael van der Kolff wrote
> That doesn't appear to work with 2.14.2. Does it work in a later version?
apparently this starts working with 2.15.2 - I suggest to upgrade to the
newest stable 2.16.1!
Eluze
--
View this message in context:
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/Per-stanza-dynam
I wonder if there is a way of creating several pieces of markup text at
a point in the music and tweaking their positions independently...
\override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . 10) <>-\markup {"pizz."}
\override TextScript #'extra-offset = #'(0 . -10)<>-\markup {"3"}
for example does giv
On 9 December 2012 23:22, David Nalesnik wrote:
>
> There is also an engraver for merging rests, found here:
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/lilypond-user@gnu.org/msg69703.html
>
Yes this is the latest version of Jay's Merge Rests Engraver, combining
features of LSR #336 and #468.
I made a reque
That doesn't appear to work with 2.14.2. Does it work in a later version?
Many thanks,
Michael
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 8:36 PM, Eluze wrote:
> Thomas Morley wrote
> > 2012/12/9 Eluze <
>
> > eluzew@
>
> > >:
> >> Michael van der Kolff wrote
> When making the modification you suggest, t
Thomas Morley wrote
> 2012/12/9 Eluze <
> eluzew@
> >:
>> Michael van der Kolff wrote
When making the modification you suggest, the result is that the p
>>> marking takes up a syllable spot, which is not the idea. What I would
>>> ideally like to happen is for the dynamic marks to be aligne
36 matches
Mail list logo
