Other than that (same with denom), the code looks fine to me.
Works! However, (and there is always a however ;-), the font and font size are
not the same as the regular (default) time signature.
Is there a a way to grab these two pieces of information from the regular
timestamp stencil and set
pabuhr writes:
>I consider it much nicer to make "strg" of type fraction?, and then num
>can be (car strg) and denom can be (cdr strg).
>and
>can just be \spreadTimeSignature #8 2/4 ... which is nicer on the eyes.
>
> I was intrigued and tried to modify the code as you suggested a
I consider it much nicer to make "strg" of type fraction?, and then num
can be (car strg) and denom can be (cdr strg).
and
can just be \spreadTimeSignature #8 2/4 ... which is nicer on the eyes.
I was intrigued and tried to modify the code as you suggested as a learning
exercise. But I
On 30/10/12 13:36, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> On 30 October 2012 13:09, Nick Payne wrote:
>> \new Voice {
>> \set beamExceptions = #'((end . (((1 . 8) . (2 2 2 2)
>> \myNotes
>> }
> Is there any alternative to setting \beamExceptions explicitly in
> every voice? That’
Gilles:
Thank you for your solution concerning \numbr. It is great and is what I am
looking for.
I have been using Ez_numbers_engraver for sometime now. It is great to display
numeric of pitch name per key signature inside notehead. One draw back is that
the notehead need to be large for ea
On 30 October 2012 13:09, Nick Payne wrote:
> \new Voice {
> \set beamExceptions = #'((end . (((1 . 8) . (2 2 2 2)
> \myNotes
> }
Is there any alternative to setting \beamExceptions explicitly in
every voice? That’s what I’m looking for...
On 30 October 2012 13:00
On 30/10/12 12:12, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
> \version "2.16.0"
>
> myNotes = \relative c' {
> \time 4/4
> d8 d d d d d d d
> }
>
> \score {
> \new Staff = "RH" <<
> \context Staff <<
> \new Voice { \myNotes }
> >>
> >>
> \layout {
> \context {
> \RemoveEmptyStaffCon
On 2012-10-30 02:12, Vaughan McAlley wrote:
This code compiles without complaint, but the beams are still in
groups of four. What am I doing wrong?
Nothing. The \time 4/4 command implicitly sets all the timing
properties, so your global values are overwritten and don't have any effect.
Cheer
This code compiles without complaint, but the beams are still in
groups of four. What am I doing wrong?
\version "2.16.0"
myNotes = \relative c' {
\time 4/4
d8 d d d d d d d
}
\score {
\new Staff = "RH" <<
\context Staff <<
\new Voice { \myNotes }
>>
>>
\layout {
\con
On 2012-10-30 00:46, Tiresia GIUNO wrote:
is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached
example is not correctly vertical aligned?
Yes, there is a reason. See e.g. Elaine Gould: Behind Bars -- The
Definitive Guide to Music Notation (published by Faber Music, 2011),
p.439, s
On Tue, 30 Oct 2012 01:02:09 +0100
Thomas Morley wrote:
> 2012/10/30 Tiresia GIUNO :
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached
> > example is not correctly vertical aligned?
>
> No idea.
> But you could use:
>
> secondWords = \lyricmode {
> Ho -- | \s
2012/10/30 Tiresia GIUNO :
> Hi,
>
> is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached
> example is not correctly vertical aligned?
No idea.
But you could use:
secondWords = \lyricmode {
Ho -- | \skip1 di -- | e
}
HTH,
Harm
_
Hi,
is there any reason why Lyrics on the two staves in the attached
example is not correctly vertical aligned?
Thanks for your help!
TG<>%{ lyrics %}
\version "2.16.0"
\include "english.ly"
firstMusic = \relative c'' {
\time 3/2
g1. | f4. g8 a4 g2 fs4 | g1.
}
firstWords = \lyricmode {
Ho
Le Sun, 28 Oct 2012 23:16:34 +0100, MING TSANG a
écrit:
(let* ...
(scalestep (modulo
(- (ly:pitch-notename pitch) (...base of key signature...)) 7))
(name (format #f "~a~a"
(string-ref "1234567" (scalestep))...
If i well understand what you want, there is a snippet very near of what
y
2012/10/29 Stefan Thomas :
[...]
> The problem is:
> I would like to have a score with drumstaff and a "normal" staff. And only
> in the normal Staff shall be a wider time signature.
> I give you an short example:
[...]
Hi Stefan,
next try:
I defined `customTime´ containing all functionality of
2012/10/29 David Kastrup :
> Thomas Morley writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its
>> argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or
>> RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete)
>>
>> \version "2.17.4"
>>
>> mus = {
>> \o
2012/10/29 David Kastrup :
[...]
> I consider it much nicer to make "strg" of type fraction?, and then num
> can be (car strg) and denom can be (cdr strg).
>
> and
>
>> \spreadTimeSignature #8 "2/4"
>
> can just be \spreadTimeSignature #8 2/4 ... which is nicer on the eyes.
Hi David,
tha
Thomas Morley writes:
> Hi,
>
> accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its
> argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or
> RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete)
>
> \version "2.17.4"
>
> mus = {
> \override TabStaff.TabNoteHead #'color = #
Hi,
accidently I noticed that DevNull produces some weird output, if its
argument contains an override to TabStaff, VaticanaStaff or
RhythmicStaff (this list may be not complete)
\version "2.17.4"
mus = {
\override TabStaff.TabNoteHead #'color = #red
% same with:
% \overr
Am 26.10.2012 12:31, schrieb Phil Holmes:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=375
Beam damping doesn't work for cross-staff beams. But I could
successfully control the beam positions manually
(http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=97).
Regards
Helge
Thanks Trevor -- I had to completely rework how the score was described
and, and you said, jettison /addlyrics. The template will be different
now, but the lyrics are indeed above the staff where I want them to be.
The issue was with using << >> in a nested way to get SopranoOne and
SopranoTwo
Fine, thanks!
Le 29 oct. 2012 à 14:00:10, Rutger Hofman a écrit :
> On 10/29/2012 01:29 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
>> Hi Jacques,
>>
>> There is the Mutopia project, but I'm unsure about the current status.
>> I've seen no activity on the mailing list for a long time. And for my
>> last projec
On 29 oct. 2012, at 15:13, Daniel Rosen wrote:
> Well, first of all, in the future, you can just paste code right into the
> body of your email, like I'm about to do--no need for an attachment. :-) And
> second, I would dispute that you couldn't get it smaller--like the page I
> referenced say
David Kastrup writes:
> Peter Van Kranenburg writes:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher:
>> 1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system.
>>
>> This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels.
>>
>> I followed the directions from the 'usage' man
Peter Van Kranenburg writes:
> Dear all,
>
> I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher:
> 1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system.
>
> This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels.
>
> I followed the directions from the 'usage' manual, and I put this on
> top of my
Dear all,
I have to provide a bitmapped image to a publisher:
1200dpi, width: 11cm. It only contains one system.
This implies a width of (11.0/2.54)*1200.0 = 5196 pixels.
I followed the directions from the 'usage' manual, and I put this on top
of my source file.
\paper{
indent=0\mm
line-
Thanks guys. It's for an online lilypond site so users can convert older
mutopia files. So it's no a real pressing issue for me, just a 'nice to
have' feature if people wanted to could go back and upgrade old mutopia
stuff.
Cheers,
Mike
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 8:07 PM, Thomas Morley <
thomasmorle
Hi Francois. Its been moved to http://www.omet.ca; use that address if you
want to use the Facebook login.
It has an editor with syntax highlighting and line numbering (CodeMirror,
using the default Latext stylesheet), it also has convert-ly, and this week
I'm adding midi2ly and musicxml2ly for on
Never mind--I found the solution: http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=794
I only just discovered the LSR, so I completely forgot to check there before
bothering everyone here. Oops. :-P
DR
-Original Message-
From: Trevor Daniels [mailto:t.dani...@treda.co.uk]
Sent: Sunday, October 28,
Daniel Rosen wrote
> Unfortunately, while this corrects the horizontal alignment of the grobs
> within the Dynamics context, they now collide with the beams, so the
> vertical spacing needs to be adjusted. I'm not sure how to do that without
> having to adjust 'Y-offset for each individual DynamicT
Well, first of all, in the future, you can just paste code right into the body
of your email, like I'm about to do--no need for an attachment. :-) And second,
I would dispute that you couldn't get it smaller--like the page I referenced
says, very few tiny examples are longer than about 10 lines
Sorry for the oversight. The attached code is as minimal as I can get it.
Thanks,
Peter
On 10/29/2012 02:48 PM, Daniel Rosen wrote:
Can't really tell from the attachment. As a rule, tiny excerpts of code (which
other users can compile themselves) are more useful for debugging than PDFs.
Check
Can't really tell from the attachment. As a rule, tiny excerpts of code (which
other users can compile themselves) are more useful for debugging than PDFs.
Check out: http://www.lilypond.org/tiny-examples.html
DR
From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:m...@peterodoherty.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2
Try using two Dynamics contexts, one above and one below.
DR
-Original Message-
From: Peter O'Doherty [mailto:m...@peterodoherty.net]
Sent: Monday, October 29, 2012 9:14 AM
To: lilypond-user
Subject: dynamics positioning
Hi,
Could someone please take a look at the attached file and he
On 10/29/2012 01:29 PM, Wim van Dommelen wrote:
Hi Jacques,
There is the Mutopia project, but I'm unsure about the current status.
I've seen no activity on the mailing list for a long time. And for my
last project, which I registered on Mutopia, I even didn't get a
confirmation at all. So I also
Hi Jacques,
There is the Mutopia project, but I'm unsure about the current status.
I've seen no activity on the mailing list for a long time. And for my
last project, which I registered on Mutopia, I even didn't get a
confirmation at all. So I also never submitted the result :-(
Does anyo
Reinhold Kainhofer writes:
> On 2012-10-28 21:35, Jacques Menu wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>>
>> I've been using Lilypond for some time, but Beethoven's Trio X für
>> Klavier, Flöte und Fagott causes me much trouble : "\partial" is not
>> usable inside a part, and Thema andante con variazioni contains
On 2012-10-28 21:35, Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello folks,
I've been using Lilypond for some time, but Beethoven's Trio X für
Klavier, Flöte und Fagott causes me much trouble : "\partial" is not
usable inside a part, and Thema andante con variazioni contains tricky
rehearsals, like:
After fighting
Hello Wim,
Thanks for this fast and detailed answer, it is much appreciated!
I'll put your suggestions in practise.
As for the current numbering error, I can circumvent it temporarily by forcing
the expected numbers explicitly.
A nice day!
Regards,
PS> Is there some site where I could contrib
Hi Jacques,
I'm not going to answer all your questions, that is just too much. One
advise: cut things in pieces and look for smaller problems. There is a
LP problem in the bar numbers in this case (which I really should
register as a bug, it increases the measure numbers twice for some
re
Guy Stalnaker wrote Monday, October 29, 2012 2:37 AM
> Hello everyone -- my first question to this list.
Hi, welcome!
> I have looked over the Learning Guide and the Notation Reference for
> help in telling Lilypond to put S1 lyrics above the staff. Yet I'm
> stymied by differences in termin
41 matches
Mail list logo
