On 2012-10-28 21:35, Jacques Menu wrote:
Hello folks,
I've been using Lilypond for some time, but Beethoven's Trio X für
Klavier, Flöte und Fagott causes me much trouble : "\partial" is not
usable inside a part, and Thema andante con variazioni contains tricky
rehearsals, like:
After fighting a lot with the problem, I found:
partialInline = #(define-music-function
(parser location nom den mus)
(integer? integer? ly:music?)
#{
\set Score.measurePosition = #(ly:make-moment (- $nom) $den)
You don't want (- $nom) here, since that might skip one measure!
In your case you want to set the measure position at the begin of the
second volta to #(ly:make-moment 0 8), if you want the second volta to
have the same bar number as the first.
If you want the second volta to have the barnumber of the first volta +
1, then I would try to set the measure position at the end of the first
volta to #(ly:make-moment 4 8). I haven't tried it out, but I think that
should work.
I always run into messages such as the following (hence my bar numbers
are wrong) :
Beethoven_WoO37_Fagott_ThemaAndanteConVariazioni.ly:493:16: warning:
Barcheck failed got 79 expect 81
because I don't know how to specify the correct "size" for the partial
bars involved (by the way, bar number 64 is already wrong):
I suppose bar 25 is already wrong, right?
Here is the code I use:
[...]
\tempoMark #3.0 #"Var. V"
% -------------------------------------------------------------------------
\repeat volta 2
% -------------------------------------------------------------------------
{
\partialInline #1 #8
Here you don't want to set the measure position to #(ly:make-moment (-
1) 8) of measure 79, since you are already in measure 79. If you set it
to -1/8, like you do, then this means after the next eighth note measure
79 will start...
You rather want to set the measure position to 3/8 of bar 79, which
means that after the eight rest measure 80 will start...
The only reason why \partial sets the measure position to -1/8 is that
the first full bar is supposed to be measure 1.
In all other cases (i.e. inside some piece), you don't ever want to set
the measure position to a negative value, as that will skip a measure in
the measure count.
Cheers,
Reinhold
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhold Kainhofer, reinh...@kainhofer.com, http://www.kainhofer.com
* Financial & Actuarial Math., Vienna Univ. of Technology, Austria
* http://www.fam.tuwien.ac.at/, DVR: 0005886
* Edition Kainhofer, Music Publisher, http://www.edition-kainhofer.com
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
