>> This looks like a plain bug to me which has been hidden up to now.
>
> The dot-note collision is probably a bug that can probably be fixed.
>
> There can also be dot-dot collisions, though, if we move that engraver
> and have dots line-up individually for each voice.
>
> When chords mesh,
> <
Hello, Keith!
> I don't know any better way to enter dynamics. I use
> \midi { context {\Voice \remove "Dynamic_performer" }}
> so that the dynamics errors don't bother me.
>
> We have it listed as a bug, that first appeared in 2.14, but did not seem
> serious enough (compared with the other MI
Werner LEMBERG gnu.org> writes:
> > Moving the engraver to the voice context gives rise to a new set of
> > problems:
>
> This looks like a plain bug to me which has been hidden up to now.
>
The dot-note collision is probably a bug that can probably be fixed.
There can also be dot-dot collisi
Michael Pozhidaev altlinux.ru> writes:
> After the migration from 2.12.2 up to 2.14.2 I have faced interesting
> problem and cannot decide is it a wrong behaviour or everything is OK
> and now there is another approach to write separate midi dynamics.
I don't know any better way to enter dynami
Hi!
After the migration from 2.12.2 up to 2.14.2 I have faced interesting
problem and cannot decide is it a wrong behaviour or everything is OK
and now there is another approach to write separate midi dynamics. In
the snippet below there are four notes. When I generate the midi file
the \p com
Entered new issues:
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2200
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2201
Is the problem appearing wneh engravers are moved an instance of
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1792
?
cheers,
Janek
___
Nils nilsgey.de> writes:
> I work frequently with custom keysigs, designed with \set Staff.keySignature
> Does anyone know how to transpose them?
>
I don't know how.
If the key signature represents some pattern, though, it might be more clear
to define a mode, analogous to major, minor, or doria
Hi all,
> It is not (currently) possible to move the "Mark_engraver" or the
> "Metronome_mark_engraver" to the StaffGroup level. I'm writing a bug
> report about this.
It will be great to have this feature…
> You can add it to the first Staff of your StaffGroup . The drawback is
> that there w
On Jan 7, 2012, at 9:23 PM, m...@apollinemike.com wrote:
> Check out line 499 and line 522.
of note-collision.cc
> I'd make the 0.5 in both of these two different properties of the
> NoteCollision grob (base-shift-factor and intersection-shift-factor, for
> example).
> Then, you can play with t
On Jan 7, 2012, at 8:48 PM, Janek Warchoł wrote:
> 2012/1/7 Werner LEMBERG :
Is there a possibility to tighten the horizontal distances in
polyphony `chords'? The Bärenreiter edition of Bach's Chaconne use
only the half distances, approximately.
>>>
>>> If i remember correctly, th
2012/1/7 Werner LEMBERG :
>>> Is there a possibility to tighten the horizontal distances in
>>> polyphony `chords'? The Bärenreiter edition of Bach's Chaconne use
>>> only the half distances, approximately.
>>
>> If i remember correctly, these values are hard-coded in c++ code.
>> This is one of t
Hello,
I work frequently with custom keysigs, designed with \set Staff.keySignature
I noticed that they don't transpose with \transpose c' d' {...}
Does anyone know how to transpose them?
Nils
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http
On 7 January 2012 18:21, Andrew C. Smith
wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> On larger orchestral scores a metronome mark will appear at the top
> of each staff group (like strings, winds, brass, etc.) Is there a way
> to achieve this in Lilypond?
>
> I've tried removing Staff_collecting_engraver and Metro
Hey everyone,
On larger orchestral scores a metronome mark will appear at the top of each
staff group (like strings, winds, brass, etc.) Is there a way to achieve this
in Lilypond?
I've tried removing Staff_collecting_engraver and Metronome_mark_engraver from
the score and adding them to Staf
>> Is there a possibility to tighten the horizontal distances in
>> polyphony `chords'? The Bärenreiter edition of Bach's Chaconne use
>> only the half distances, approximately.
>
> If i remember correctly, these values are hard-coded in c++ code.
> This is one of the things i'm interested in doi
Ah, yes ... I will rewrite this, when I'm in my machine again
Cheers, Jan-Peter
Am 07.01.2012 um 09:42 schrieb David Kastrup :
> Jan-Peter Voigt writes:
>
>> Am 06.01.2012 10:17, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
>>> Am 06.01.2012 09:35, schrieb Jan-Peter Voigt:
Hello David,
the \sour
Hello Carl, Hello David,
thanks for your replies!
I will read through those threads next week. This might help me understand what
is happening under the hood.
The basic include is working as expected. But I think it would be a nice
feature if one could search for files to include using scheme.
17 matches
Mail list logo
