Hello Carl, Hello David, thanks for your replies! I will read through those threads next week. This might help me understand what is happening under the hood.
The basic include is working as expected. But I think it would be a nice feature if one could search for files to include using scheme. Cheers, Jan-Peter Am 06.01.2012 um 21:40 schrieb Carl Sorensen <c_soren...@byu.edu>: > On 1/6/12 7:28 AM, "David Kastrup" <d...@gnu.org> wrote: > >> >> Now I don't want to repeat old mistakes, but I don't really have the >> time for an extended investigation. So if somebody gives me all the >> data in a manner that does not require all too much thinking on my side, >> I might try putting that kind of functionality back. > > Here is a thread that discusses this problem. You were not interested in > eliminating > parser-parse-file at this point, but it appears that it got eliminated > anyway. > > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.lilypond.devel/29392/focus=29404 > > > These patches came in response to issue 1096, > > <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1096> > > > where a segfault happened with parser-parse-string due to infinite > recursion, IIUC. Also see issue 1119: > > <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=1119> > > > > A related thread (indexed in issue 1096) is: > > http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-devel/2010-02/msg00106.html > > > HTH, > > Carl > > > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
