Nick Baskin gmail.com> writes:
> >
> > In a large-scale Frenched score for band, I would like to have rehearsal
> > marks appear above the woodwinds as well as above the brass. In doing so,
> > however, I have encountered two problems in 2.14.2:
> >
> > 1) In adapting the snippet from NR 1.8.1 to
Consider using articulation shorthand:
\relative c' { c-. d-. e-. f-. | g-^ a-^ b-^ c-^ }
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/notation/expressive-marks-attached-to-notes#articulations-and-ornamentations
To my knowledge, there isn't any simple way of attaching a single
articulation to a g
Is there a way to specify articulation over several notes. Eg., relative c' {
c d e f | g a b c }. I would like to make the first four notes staccato and
the second 4 marcato. Just, clarifying, I understand that I can do
c\staccato d\staccato etc. Can I do something like (c d e f)\staccato?
Tha
Thanks to Father Gordon Gilbert, Reinhold Kainhofer, Henning Hraban
Ramm, Phil Holmes, and René Brandenburger for sharing Lilypond files
of Christmas carols.
And thanks to the code-composers who make Lilypond possible!
I'm continuing to add to the webpage: it now includes a 4-voice
version of Aul
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:14 PM, Andrew Hawryluk wrote:
> Very strange ... when I move the Mark_engraver to the Staff context it
> works as expected, but within the StaffGroup context it does not. I'm
> not sure what the difference is.
>
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 7:38 PM, Nick Baskin wrote:
> >
Thanks, but 2.12 and 2.14 seem ok to compile it. I compiled it using 2.13.58
when I last edited it on April 17 last year (2011). So it may be a regression.
Haipeng
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/lis
2011/12/31 gajatko :
> Robin Bannister wrote:
> gajatko wrote: > in future I will also need numbers like 9,11,13 etc. Check
> out LSR 756 http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=756 and some context
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-03/msg00138.html
> Cheers, Robin
>
> Thank you, i
Robin Bannister wrote:
>
> gajatko wrote:
>> in future I will also need numbers like 9,11,13 etc.
>
> Check out LSR 756
> http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=756
>
> and some context
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-03/msg00138.html
>
>
> Cheers,
> Robin
Thank yo
Quoting "m...@apollinemike.com" :
You can use Scheme engravers. I use them for exactly this sorta thing.
input/regression/scheme-engraver.ly in the source code for LilyPond
(you can google this file to find it on a few servers).
Thank you for your reply! Frankly, I don't understand a thi
gajatko wrote:
in future I will also need numbers like 9,11,13 etc.
Check out LSR 756
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=756
and some context
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2011-03/msg00138.html
Cheers,
Robin
___
lilypond-
Hello,
On 31 December 2011 14:13, gajatko wrote:
>
>
> James-379 wrote:
>> I get warnings about using fingering
>> numbers >5 (but that is expected) however it all compiles.
>>
> I love it: "it works for me", "cannot reproduce" ;) .
Err... if you _read_ what I wrote and not just paraphrase me ou
James-379 wrote:
> I get warnings about using fingering
> numbers >5 (but that is expected) however it all compiles.
>
I love it: "it works for me", "cannot reproduce" ;) . Whatever, in general
approach, warning=error. What would be a legitimate way to visually get the
same output as a fingering
Hi,
2011/12/31 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng :
> Hello,
> I'm trying to compile my overture on the newest LP, but it gives no errors
> and aborts suddenly. When I extract parts, it seems that there's a problem
> at bar 224 of Clarinet. But the full score stops at bar 160. No other errors
> related to mydefs.
Am 30.12.2011 08:02, schrieb Keith OHara:
Xavier Scheuer gmail.com> writes:
On 19 December 2011 09:38, C.Flothow gmx.de> wrote:
I had read all that and I still don't see anything there that helps
with my problem!
Isn't
Sorry,
it must have to do with my mail-program (googlemail).
I will take care in the future.
Here is the beginning of the theme.
> Dear community,
> I have a problem with subdivided beams in a 5/16 bar.
> I want to have subbeams of irregular length, grouped in 2+3 16ths.
> Unfortunately it doesn'
On Dec 30, 2011, at 11:47 PM, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'm trying to implement cross-staff stems that would not get
> disconnected when the distance between staves changes.
>
> Ideally, I need a function that would extend the stem from the note in
> the lower staff exactly until it meets
You did not have the cc on this mail either, so others do not know that you
consider the issue solved.
Hans
On 31 Dec 2011, at 10:24, Stefan Thomas wrote:
> Dear Hans,
> thanks, it works fine now!
> Sorry for not having included the copy in my answer, I thought I did.
> Best wishes to the new
17 matches
Mail list logo
