James-379 wrote: > I get warnings about using fingering > numbers >5 (but that is expected) however it all compiles. > I love it: "it works for me", "cannot reproduce" ;) . Whatever, in general approach, warning=error. What would be a legitimate way to visually get the same output as a fingering, but not logically? I use "fingering" feature to annotate a number of a component of a chord, like 1,3,5,7 for a dominant seventh. These annotations must be on the right side of each note, as the fingering is after setting it up properly. So, in future I will also need numbers like 9,11,13 etc. In the current lily version, setting a finger number 10 or more causes an "unexpected unsigned" compilation error. But, as I said, I do not want use a feature which logically corresponds to a figering. What I wish to accoplish is to get visually the same effect. I hope I made things clear.
Greetings - gajatko -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Lilypond-hangs-on-a-script-after-adding-fingering-tp33039597p33059201.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
