Re: convert from .mus to .ly (Bach BWV 1073: Canon ) - SOLVED

2011-05-26 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11-05-26 07:40 PM, Marc Mouries wrote: This piece is a canon where the 4 instruments play the same notes but using a different key. http://erato.uvt.nl/files/imglnks/usimg/f/f7/IMSLP88821-PMLP18465-BWV_1073.pdf I want to transpose it for 4 violins Would anyone has a script that would al

Re: convert from .mus to .ly (Bach BWV 1073: Canon ) - SOLVED

2011-05-26 Thread Marc Mouries
This piece is a canon where the 4 instruments play the same notes but using a different key. http://erato.uvt.nl/files/imglnks/usimg/f/f7/IMSLP88821-PMLP18465-BWV_1073.pdf I want to transpose it for 4 violins Would anyone has a script that would allow me to transpose and generate the lilyp

Re: convert from .mus to .ly (Bach BWV 1073: Canon )

2011-05-26 Thread Marc Mouries
On 5/26/2011 9:27 PM, Colin Campbell wrote: On 11-05-26 11:18 AM, Marc Mouries wrote: On 5/24/2011 10:01 PM, Shane Brandes wrote: Yes. First you must convert the Finale 2002 file to a Finale version that supports exporting to a .xml version (Finale 2007 or thereabouts) and then from there it is

Re: convert from .mus to .ly (Bach BWV 1073: Canon )

2011-05-26 Thread Colin Campbell
On 11-05-26 11:18 AM, Marc Mouries wrote: On 5/24/2011 10:01 PM, Shane Brandes wrote: Yes. First you must convert the Finale 2002 file to a Finale version that supports exporting to a .xml version (Finale 2007 or thereabouts) and then from there it is usually easy to convert the .xml file to .ly

Re: Vertical spacing for fixed y-offset of systems *calculated from top staff line*?

2011-05-26 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 5/26/11 4:09 PM, "Trevor Bača" wrote: > 2011/5/25 Carl Sorensen >> On 5/25/11 4:27 PM, "Trevor Bača" wrote: >> Is there any way to achieve the vertical layout of systems that I'm looking for with modern versions of Lily? >> >> I couldn't get your examples to compile, so I couldn't

Re: Completely separate staff

2011-05-26 Thread James Lowe
Hello On 26 May 2011, at 21:52, "Fabian Binz" mailto:fabianb...@yahoo.de>> wrote: Hi, how can I add a completely separate staff to my score? I want to display a single separate line below all other lines, which is not synchronized with or somehow related to the rest of the music. I tried the

Re: Vertical spacing for fixed y-offset of systems *calculated from top staff line*?

2011-05-26 Thread Trevor Bača
2011/5/25 Carl Sorensen > On 5/25/11 4:27 PM, "Trevor Bača" wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I'm looking to vertically lay out systems in a very rigid and regular > way. > > (This is the method I documented a while back in 4.4.2 'Explicit staff > and > > system positioning' using the Y-offset and alignm

Re: Alternate, as in separate, chords

2011-05-26 Thread Stan Mulder
Stan Mulder earthlink.net> writes: > > Is it possible to put a different set of chords above the main line of chords > like this (I hope this formats correctly): > > (Db7) > G7C > > > > > --

Completely separate staff

2011-05-26 Thread Fabian Binz
Hi, how can I add a completely separate staff to my score? I want to display a single separate line below all other lines, which is not synchronized with or somehow related to the rest of the music. I tried the following (where someChords, melody, text and separateLine are defined elsewhere):

Re: book and instrument

2011-05-26 Thread Xavier Scheuer
On 26 May 2011 22:40, Jean-Charles Malahieude wrote: > > Hi all! > > When using a separate book for generating instrumental parts, is there a > easy way to get rid of the superfluous "instrument" appearing with each > bookpart? The answer has been given on the French Users mailing list: http://li

Re: book and instrument

2011-05-26 Thread Nicolas Sceaux
Le 26 mai 2011 à 22:40, Jean-Charles Malahieude a écrit : > Hi all! > > When using a separate book for generating instrumental parts, is there a > easy way to get rid of the superfluous "instrument" appearing with each > bookpart? If you want the instrument to appear only on the title page, the

book and instrument

2011-05-26 Thread Jean-Charles Malahieude
Hi all! When using a separate book for generating instrumental parts, is there a easy way to get rid of the superfluous "instrument" appearing with each bookpart? ---8<--- \version "2.13.61" \book { \header { title = "The Book Title" instrument = "instrument" } \bookpart { \header { titl

Re: Alternate, as in separate, chords

2011-05-26 Thread Robin Bannister
Stan Mulder wrote: Is it possible to put a different set of chords above the main line of chords ... And what about the parenthesis around the chord name. For parenthesizing see the thread with http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-03/msg00016.html which also links to addBrack

Re: Strange transposing effect

2011-05-26 Thread Trevor Daniels
D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote Thursday, May 26, 2011 6:10 PM On Thu, 26 May 2011 09:58:41 -0700 Paul Scott wrote: > Thanks. That kind of explains the first issue but I still > don't > understand why the D should dip down instead of up in the > transposed > section. Not exactly but absolute D is

Re: convert from .mus to .ly (Bach BWV 1073: Canon )

2011-05-26 Thread Marc Mouries
On 5/24/2011 10:01 PM, Shane Brandes wrote: Yes. First you must convert the Finale 2002 file to a Finale version that supports exporting to a .xml version (Finale 2007 or thereabouts) and then from there it is usually easy to convert the .xml file to .ly using xml2ly. Shane On Tue, May 24, 2011

Re: Strange transposing effect

2011-05-26 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Thu, 26 May 2011 09:58:41 -0700 Paul Scott wrote: > > Thanks. That kind of explains the first issue but I still don't > > understand why the D should dip down instead of up in the transposed > > section. > > Not exactly but absolute D is a fifth lower than absolute A. Right. That's why I th

Re: Strange transposing effect

2011-05-26 Thread Paul Scott
On 05/26/2011 09:20 AM, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: On Wed, 25 May 2011 17:27:40 -0700 Paul Scott wrote: More problematical, since I haven't figured out a workaround, is the output. In the key of A the D is above the A as I would expect since it is closer to go up than down. When it switches to B

Re: Strange transposing effect

2011-05-26 Thread D'Arcy J.M. Cain
On Wed, 25 May 2011 17:27:40 -0700 Paul Scott wrote: > > More problematical, since I haven't figured out a workaround, is the > > output. In the key of A the D is above the A as I would expect since > > it is closer to go up than down. When it switches to Bb the Eb drops > > below the Bb even th

RE: Cross-staff beaming

2011-05-26 Thread James Lowe
Hello, )-Original Message- )From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org )[mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org] On )Behalf Of Hilary Snaden )Sent: 26 May 2011 12:16 )To: lilypond-user@gnu.org )Subject: Cross-staff beaming ) )I've just installed 2.13.

Re: Cross-staff beaming

2011-05-26 Thread Phil Holmes
- Original Message - From: "Hilary Snaden" To: Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 12:15 PM Subject: Cross-staff beaming I've just installed 2.13.61 (Windoze binary) I'm working on a piece with a lot of cross-staff arpeggios, many of which need their stem lengths/beam positions tweaked fo

Cross-staff beaming

2011-05-26 Thread Hilary Snaden
I've just installed 2.13.61 (Windoze binary) I'm working on a piece with a lot of cross-staff arpeggios, many of which need their stem lengths/beam positions tweaked for easier reading. The manualBeam function in the manual manualBeam = #(define-music-function (parser location beg-end) (pai