On 24/08/10 08:21, Nick Payne wrote:
I think I have reported this before - a beamed note with an accidental
on a ledger line above the stave has the accidental colliding with the
stem of the previous note. For different notes it happens at different
heights above the stave and also seems to dep
I think I have reported this before - a beamed note with an accidental
on a ledger line above the stave has the accidental colliding with the
stem of the previous note. For different notes it happens at different
heights above the stave and also seems to depend on the length of the
stem of the
On 23 August 2010 12:09, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
>
> Hi Nick & Xavier,
>
> thanks very much and sorry for re-asking the question (when I described
> the problem I had no internet connection and I forgot to check the
> archives before actually sending the mail).
Maybe there should be a notice/warni
On Mon 23 Aug 2010, 10:04 Patrick Schmidt wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> it doesn't seem to be possible to draw arrow-type arpeggios across
> several voices. In the following example the arpeggio is drawn but
> the arrow is missing.
>
> \version "2.13.30"
> musicVoiceOne = {
> \arpeggioArrowUp
%{ \o
As I said, the midi is 1) not well balanced, and 2) too concret on notes, but
without required information for accurate dynamics and KS (keyswitch).
Therefore, Sibelius will treat all pizz as arco, all solo violin passages as
tutti, and all muted brass as open. Moreover, the machine-gun sounded
Hi Haipeng,
Wouldn't it be more suitable to take the midi output from \midi{} and
import it into your Sibelius or Garritan applications.
Craig Bakalian
On Mon, 2010-08-23 at 04:04 -0400, lilypond-user-requ...@gnu.org wrote:
> I (and some people) ever requested the Lilypond Team to develop a
Graham Okely iinet.net.au> writes:
> > However, once you learn to work with named contexts, I definitely
> > recommend to
> > use that principle instead.
> >
> >/Mats
> >
> > Mats
> > Can you explain that again?:confused:
> > Does your explanation mean you can align the lyrics with notes t
Hi Eluze,
thank you! I think it works because the \once\override... command
changes the normal arpeggio style to a style with an arrow. So in
this example you don't really need the command \arpeggioArrowUp any
more.
Cheers
patrick
Am 23.08.2010 um 12:07 schrieb eluze:
hi Patrick
since
Hi Nick & Xavier,
thanks very much and sorry for re-asking the question (when I
described the problem I had no internet connection and I forgot to
check the archives before actually sending the mail).
Cheers
patrick
Am 23.08.2010 um 11:41 schrieb Nick Payne:
On 23/08/10 18:04, Patrick Sch
Martin said:
> What do you mean with "not suitable" ?
> A Lilypond to MusicXML conversion tool probably will not solve the limited
> MIDI capacities of Lilypond.
No! If you have Sibelius and its own vst or Garritan personal Orchestra, you
can import Strauss's Pizzicato Polka and a piece containin
On 23/08/10 18:04, Patrick Schmidt wrote:
Hi all,
it doesn't seem to be possible to draw arrow-type arpeggios across
several voices. In the following example the arpeggio is drawn but the
arrow is missing.
\version "2.13.30"
musicVoiceOne = {
\arpeggioArrowUp
4\arpeggio
}
musicVoiceTwo =
Hi all,
it doesn't seem to be possible to draw arrow-type arpeggios across
several voices. In the following example the arpeggio is drawn but
the arrow is missing.
\version "2.13.30"
musicVoiceOne = {
\arpeggioArrowUp
4\arpeggio
}
musicVoiceTwo = {
%\arpeggioArrowUp
e4\arpeggio
}
On Mon, 23 Aug 2010, 胡海鹏 - Hu Haipeng wrote:
Hello, Another reason: I just finished my first orchestral piece, and
would like to use vst to hear the real sound. But Lilypond's midi output
is not suitable for Sibelius and Garritan, and I have to make many
specialized tracks which wasted my
13 matches
Mail list logo
