Re: Accidentals and Fingerings

2010-01-30 Thread Trevor Daniels
copied to bug list David Stocker wrote Friday, January 29, 2010 3:12 PM Is there any reason why fingerings in these two chords should behave differently relative to the noteheads in their respective chords? It is because the first note in the first chord carries the visible accidental, but

Re: Colliding articulation with beam

2010-01-30 Thread Jean-Alexis Montignies
Le 27 janv. 2010 à 20:34, Graham Percival a écrit : > It's probably already in the tracker. I wouldn't bother > submitting it. > So let it be :) How to work around that problem when it happens? I've seen problems with articulations and slurs as well. How can I space the chords from the syste

Re: typesetting an unusual chord

2010-01-30 Thread Nick Payne
The snippet at http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=505 may help. Nick On 31/01/10 07:51, Stefaan Himpe wrote: Hello all, I'm trying to typeset the following somewhat unusual chord: 4 As is to be expected, the 'des d' notes give a problem. I found instructions on how to typeset a situation li

Re: Accidentals and Fingerings

2010-01-30 Thread Nick Payne
I don't know why the inconsistency happens, but if you add \override Fingering #'script-priority = #-101 to each voice, then the offset from the notehead will be consistent: \version "2.13.11" \include "english.ly" fingers = { \relative c { 4 r r2 4 r r2 } } thumb = { \relative c { 4 r r2

typesetting an unusual chord

2010-01-30 Thread Stefaan Himpe
Hello all, I'm trying to typeset the following somewhat unusual chord: 4 As is to be expected, the 'des d' notes give a problem. I found instructions on how to typeset a situation like this in the manual: naturalplusflat = \markup { \natural \flat } \relative c'' { \once \override Accidental

Re: transposing and changePitch

2010-01-30 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear Mark, I've used the last version of Gilles, at http://gillesth.free.fr/Lilypond/changePitch/changePitch.ly 2010/1/30 Mark Polesky > Stefan Thomas wrote: > > Dear community, > > > > in the below quoted snippet the change-Pitch-command does > > not work as expected. It doesn't produce the sec

Re: transposing and changePitch

2010-01-30 Thread Mark Polesky
Stefan Thomas wrote: > Dear community, > > in the below quoted snippet the change-Pitch-command does > not work as expected. It doesn't produce the second pitch > one octave higher! > > \version "2.12.2" > \include "changePitch.ly" > brokenoctaves = #(define-music-function (parser > location x

Re: scheme-function to export a note-list?

2010-01-30 Thread Carl Sorensen
On 1/30/10 9:09 AM, "Ewald Gutenkunst" wrote: > > The \ambitus is already a sort of analysis, it shows simply the range of > pitches. But how is it possible to have the information of the whole staff at > the beginning of it? Your new engraver goes step by step through the score > and displa

Re: scheme-function to export a note-list?

2010-01-30 Thread Ewald Gutenkunst
Thanks a lot Reinhold!!! It works perfectly and is exactly what I looked for. Ok, I am far away to understand it really, but it's a great motivation to lern the basics of scheme. It seems that lilypond has no limitations In a first step I will try to transfer the principle to other event

transposing and changePitch

2010-01-30 Thread Stefan Thomas
Dear community, in the below quoted snippet the change-Pitch-command does not work as expected. It doesn't produce the second pitch one octave higher! \version "2.12.2" \include "changePitch.ly" brokenoctaves = #(define-music-function (parser location x) (ly:music?) #{ $x

Re: Ambitus

2010-01-30 Thread Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
northofscotland wrote: A few days ago I posted a question about moving the note heads in an ambitus independently. It hasn't generated any response, and wondered if this was because it just isn't possible. Am I right? If so, I'll stop worrying! I checked the doc and couldn't find an easy wa

Ambitus

2010-01-30 Thread northofscotland
A few days ago I posted a question about moving the note heads in an ambitus independently. It hasn't generated any response, and wondered if this was because it just isn't possible. Am I right? If so, I'll stop worrying! -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Ambitus-tp273827

Re: [2.13.11] Overriding font-name in markups increases font-size [was:] strange problem with markup in \tempo

2010-01-30 Thread Dmytro O. Redchuk
Hi! Well... Have i written something wrong?-) I guess here are two options: this *is* the problem, or i have missed something heavily, there is no any problem with overriding font-name in markups. In the latter case --- please don’t mind my bothering you, and let me know what i am doing wrong. T

Re: Editing notes in a separate file

2010-01-30 Thread James Bailey
On 02.01.2010, at 20:49, Carl Sorensen wrote: May I suggest that the proper way to handle this is not to try to turn LilyPond into an information manager? Instead, the proper way is to use an information manager with LilyPond. I would recommend that the semantically appropriate way to handl