Hi! Well... Have i written something wrong?-)
I guess here are two options: this *is* the problem, or i have missed
something heavily, there is no any problem with overriding font-name in
markups.
In the latter case --- please don’t mind my bothering you, and let me
know what i am doing wrong. Thanks :-)
On the other hand, if there *is* the problem with overriding font-name
in markups --- could anybody verify it and submit a bug, please?
Actually, there can be the third option: i am too impatient :-)
Then the answer: "wait, you’re too impatient" is a great answer, too.
And the fourth --- it is an intended behavior B]
ps. If my emails sometimes look strange --- that’s all because of my
strange English ;-)
pps. Thank you everyone who makes lilypond better.
ppps.
% ---------8<------------------------
{
c''
-\markup\concat {
"string"
% looks exactly as if here is one more override:
% \override #'(font-size . 1)
\override #'(font-name . "New Century Schoolbook") "string"
}
}
% ---------8<------------------------
У ср, 2010-01-27 у 10:12 +0200, Dmytro O. Redchuk пише:
> Hi!
>
> So, overriding font-name in markup increases font-size.
[...]
> Well... As usually, i can miss and/or mess something easily. Please,
> masters, correct me, if i am wrong
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
<<attachment: font-name-in-markups.png>>
_______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
