Hugh Myers schrieb:
In Segovia's 'Diatonic Major and Minor Scales', under the notes shown
for a given scale are marks beginning with a number surrounded by
parenthesis followed by a line vaguely parallel to the notes,
concluding with an uptick between a given pair of notes. What is this
called an
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 21:16 +, Graham Percival wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:09:26AM +1100, Nick Payne wrote:
> > The foot-separation variable that can be used in the \paper block
> > doesn't seem to have any effect. It's documented in the 2.13.9 NR as:
>
> Yes, we know. The spacing v
Thanks James--- my description works a lot better with an illustration!
--hsm
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 6:19 PM, James Lowe wrote:
> Here's a link to what is being mentioned here:
>
> http://www.sheetmusicplus.com/look_inside/1938302/image/137025
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypo
Here's a link to what is being mentioned here:
http://www.sheetmusicplus.com/look_inside/1938302/image/137025
-Original Message-
From: lilypond-user-bounces+james.lowe=datacore@gnu.org on behalf of Hugh
Myers
Sent: Sun 20/12/2009 1:17
To: lilypond-user
Subject: Need help before I
In Segovia's 'Diatonic Major and Minor Scales', under the notes shown
for a given scale are marks beginning with a number surrounded by
parenthesis followed by a line vaguely parallel to the notes,
concluding with an uptick between a given pair of notes. What is this
called and how might I duplicat
On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 08:09:26AM +1100, Nick Payne wrote:
> The foot-separation variable that can be used in the \paper block
> doesn't seem to have any effect. It's documented in the 2.13.9 NR as:
Yes, we know. The spacing variables have changed. No, the
documentation hasn't been updated ye
The foot-separation variable that can be used in the \paper block
doesn't seem to have any effect. It's documented in the 2.13.9 NR as:
foot-separation: Distance between the bottom-most music system and the
page footer. Default: 4\mm.
but in my test below, putting in different values doesn't
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
>UTF-8 ought to do it.
Confirmed. I run Lilypond under Vista and I get any diacritical's I
need when I save my file in UTF-8 format. Before I figured that out I
was using a VERY old text editor that didn't know anything about
Unicode. I could show those characters in that ed
A couple of detailed comments on the Learning Manual:
- At http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/web/learning#Learning,
I find the formulation in "Read it": "read this manual in the same
format as this one." very confusing. Honestly, I don't understand what
you mean. If you mean that the
alternatively you can look up the table here:
http://www.utf8-chartable.de/
and then manually put in the value using the '\char ##' function.
For example
\header {
title = \markup {\concat {"Bourr" \char ##x009 "e"} }
}
Which gives Bourrée with an e-acute (x009). The \concat switch mea
UTF-8 ought to do it.
Jon
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 1:39 PM, Stefan Thomas <
kontrapunktste...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Dear community,
> which encoding do I have to choose, to get the german "Umlaute" (like ä, ö,
> etc.) properly shown on a windows-machine?
>
> ___
Dear community,
which encoding do I have to choose, to get the german "Umlaute" (like ä, ö,
etc.) properly shown on a windows-machine?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi masters!
Thank you for \looks{Slower,Faster}:
http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Item?id=305
Thank you for LilyPond, thank you for your job!
ps. Sorry for the noise :-) THANK YOU!
--
Dmytro O. Redchuk
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu
craigbakalian writes:
> Hi,
>
> I did a google search on "lilypond tacet" but came up with very little.
> How do you tacet a part? Specifically, in a first movement the part
> plays, the second movement is tacet, and the third movement the part
> plays. It has been a while since my days of play
Hu Haipeng wrote:
Why this compilation gets only two pages?
Mmm, that's my fault.
I commented out the midi generation to save time,
and I may have needed global-staff-size 6 in the initial stage
while I had done this incorrectly.
This size squeezes much more than you need, the second page
Right you are! This should take care of that oversight. Either place
it in the same directory as cards.ly or in some some place that
Lilypond can find--- then try again.
--hsm
On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Herbert Liechti
wrote:
> Hugh Myers schrieb:
>> I have previously seen inquires about m
Hi,
Isn't this only a problem with 2.13.8?
Craig Bakalian
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi,
I did a google search on "lilypond tacet" but came up with very little.
How do you tacet a part? Specifically, in a first movement the part
plays, the second movement is tacet, and the third movement the part
plays. It has been a while since my days of playing, but isn't the
standard a multi
On Dec 19, 2009, at 2:49 AM, David Kastrup wrote:
Robert Ley writes:
Also, please remember that some of us, me included, have little
experience
writing command lines, so when you put, as part of the first
information on
command line use:
Create a directory to store these scripts,
I got two thoughts when I'm outside.
1. Why doesn't Lilypond give a warning when the staves run off the page? This
is very important for me, otherwise I must find a visual proofreader for every
piece.
2. How about switching back ragged-last-bottom to ##t and change
ragged-bottom to ##t too?
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:38:01PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> At the Windows download page, I would propose to remove all the current
> information, except the link to the installer, and replace it by the
> nice introduction with screen-shots. At the bottom of the page, you can
> add link
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:38:01PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Think of a Windows user who wants to try LilyPond. She will click on
> Download, quickly locate the Windows logo and click on that and probably
> miss the "Note: ..." at the top of this intermediate page.
Good point; I've added
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:38:01PM +0100, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> Actually, the current installation instructions are almost
> over-emphasized on the current web page. These steps are the
> same as for almost any other Windows application so I'm not
> convinced we need to comment on them.
That'
Robert Ley writes:
> Thanks.
> I had found most of that.
> What I had meant is more along the lines of what Tim McNamara said:
>
>
> IMHO here is where we run into the issue of what LilyPond *is.*
> It's a backend with no face, basically. This is something that
> most Windows and Ma
24 matches
Mail list logo
