Re: changing a snippet in the LSR

2009-11-01 Thread Neil Puttock
2009/10/31 Marc Hohl : > how can a snippet in the LSR be corrected? You either wait for an LSR editor to do your bidding, or make a copy of the original snippet and add something like `correction' to the title. > http://lsr.dsi.unimi.it/LSR/Snippet?id=633 I've amended the snippet with your sugg

Re: where goes \midi {}

2009-11-01 Thread yota
found ... in doc MIDI output is created only when a \midi block is included within a score block defined with a \score command. If it is placed within an explicitly instantiated score context (i.e. within a \new Score block) the file will fail. To solve this, enclose the \new Score and the \midi

where goes \midi {}

2009-11-01 Thread yota
hello everybody, I read the manual thoroughly (twice) and yet. To do it beautifully I used \new Score, Staff, Voice stuffs, the problem came with \with :) , the corollary was I could not found any example fitting my case. So I tried to put \midi{} it everywhere and failed here is the file...

Re: escaped string

2009-11-01 Thread Wilbert Berendsen
Op zondag 01 november 2009 schreef Erik: > \layout { > \context { > \Staff > \override VerticalAxisGroup #'minimum-Y-extent = #'(-3 . 3) > \fontSize = #-2 > } > } You should remove the \ before fontSize. fontSize is not a command but a variable that can be set to a value. This should wor

Re: music glossary

2009-11-01 Thread Trevor Daniels
Graham Percival wrote Sunday, November 01, 2009 1:03 PM On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:12:10PM +0100, C.Flothow wrote: 2. It would greatly improve usability of the glossary if You had an index of the terms of Your own language (eg. German) and need not rely on the use of searches. Texinfo onl

Re: website so close, and yet so far

2009-11-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 05:10:31PM +0100, Federico Bruni wrote: > I would be glad to do it.. > The only problem is that it's not just about the CSS file, I should also > add a div #wrap and a new class to the div #main. Why? Just add the relevant code to the #body or #main or whatever it is that

Re: website so close, and yet so far

2009-11-01 Thread Federico Bruni
Patrick McCarty wrote: On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Federico Bruni wrote: Patrick McCarty wrote: On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Reinhold Kainhofer wrote: there is the same issue with Konqueror 4 If anyone has a more portable fix, please let me know. I would use this solution, it's

Re: website so close, and yet so far

2009-11-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:40:40PM +0100, Marc Hohl wrote: > Graham Percival schrieb: >> Thanks! Any possibility of adding a minimum-length to the >> glissandi? Some of them are really hard to spot. > > You're right - fixed. Thanks, added. Cheers, - Graham _

Re: textspan

2009-11-01 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Frédéric, Works fine, thanks! But I still do not understand why it does not work with only one voice (i.e. without \new Voice). That's definitely beyond my understanding of Lilypond internals — perhaps someone else (Han-Wen? Mats? Nicolas? Joe?) knows the technical reason(s). Cheers,

Re: textspan

2009-11-01 Thread Frédéric Bron
> Because your construct doesn't have two Voice constructs, only two > expressions in the same Voice. Works fine, thanks! But I still do not understand why it does not work with only one voice (i.e. without \new Voice). Frédéric ___ lilypond-user mail

Re: music glossary

2009-11-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 12:12:10PM +0100, C.Flothow wrote: > 2. It would greatly improve usability of the glossary if You had an > index of the terms of Your own language (eg. German) and need not rely > on the use of searches. Texinfo only supports having 5-6 different indexes. So for this,

Re: textspan

2009-11-01 Thread Kieren MacMillan
Hi Frédéric, It is funny. I was quite sure to have the solution but I do not understand why what I propose does not work: you have to separate notes and TextSpan in parallel music expressions. Can somebody tell why this does not work? Because your construct doesn't have two Voice constructs, o

Re: textspan

2009-11-01 Thread Frédéric Bron
It is funny. I was quite sure to have the solution but I do not understand why what I propose does not work: you have to separate notes and TextSpan in parallel music expressions. Can somebody tell why this does not work? Frédéric \version "2.12.2" \new Score << \new Staff \relative c' { \time

Re: tempo mark in large score for each group

2009-11-01 Thread Frédéric Bron
>> You have forgotten plenty of closing >> > > Some email clients will remove those, so this isn't necessarily > a problem in his original file. Should not be that as the file was attached, not included in the message. Frédéric ___ lilypond-user mailin

Re: tempo mark in large score for each group

2009-11-01 Thread Graham Percival
On Sun, Nov 01, 2009 at 08:48:15AM +0100, Frédéric Bron wrote: > You have forgotten plenty of closing >> Some email clients will remove those, so this isn't necessarily a problem in his original file. Cheers, - Graham ___ lilypond-user mailing list li

music glossary

2009-11-01 Thread C.Flothow
1. IMHO, under the heading "appoggiatura" there should be a cross reference similar to the one under "acciaccatura". Not having an English music education it was not clear to me that You have to look under "grace notes" to find more about issues concerning appoggiaturas. Are there more mu

textspan

2009-11-01 Thread Erik Appeldoorn
I have defined the following \override TextSpanner #'(bound-details left text) = "Ral." Within a \time 3/4 I have the following notes: d2\startTextSpan d4 | cis a2\stopTextSpan | The Ral. now stops directly above the a2. Other voices above it have more notes there, so the Ral. stops far m

Re: tempo mark in large score for each group

2009-11-01 Thread Frédéric Bron
> Thank you for your help.  I have altered your example to the attached below > and then went and tried to apply it to my score and for a reason I cannot > understand it won't compile. > I've attached it too. > If you have the time would you take a look a see what I'm doing wrong?  The > file wi