On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 11:40:41PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
>
> > Yes, but most novices with no knowledge of lilypond or music
> > theory won't be writing in 5 sharps or flats, double-sharps
> > or flats, or b/c e/f sharp/flats.
>
> These accidentals are common. B-sharp crops up in jazz tune
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Graham Percival wrote:
> From: Graham Percival
> Subject: Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 7:10 AM
> On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:01:05PM
> -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > > If the ab
Scribus will automatically refresh its PDF's, so there is no real need
for inline rendering for larger documents.
(Anyway, developing something like this should not be so hard, as on
embedded images there is a "page" flag, for embedding multi-page images.
So if several render frames could poin
--- On Sat, 8/29/09, Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
wrote:
> From: Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool)
> Subject: Re: Lilypond Speed
> To: "Jonathan Wilkes"
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Date: Saturday, August 29, 2009, 6:40 AM
> Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > It sounds like there is a wide discrepancy
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:01:05PM -0700, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
> > If the above seems confusing, consider this: if you were
> > playing a
> > piano, which key would you hit? If you would press a black
> > key,
> > then you must add -is or -es to the note name!
>
> The hint at the end about black
Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
It sounds like there is a wide discrepancy depending on machine/os/etc.
Does anyone have any insight into how I could decrease this time on my
winxp machine?
I feel like if I could get it down to something close to one second, it
would be a lot easier to learn Lilypond
Dear Frank,
Thank you for the snippet and modifications. Just looking at it makes my
head
spin. Hopefully, I'll be able to use it after studying it.
Fred.
Am Freitag, 28. August 2009 schrieb Frederick Dennis:
> > > I'm creating scores for my choir and because some of us use duplex
> > > printers,
Dear Jonathan,
It takes me 11 seconds the first time, 4 seconds without a version number
and 3 seconds with a version number.
AMD Sempron 2500+
1.4 GHz, 448MB of RAM
Physical Address Extension
Windows XP Professional
Fred
___
lilypond-user mailing list
li
Anybody of you has tried using Scribus 1.3.5 to render LilyPond files?
See here: http://docs.scribus.net/index.php?lang=en&page=renderframes
If the score is one page only, it works fine.
But if it's 2 pages or more, I could not find any way to spread the
LilyPond output over the pages.
So I can
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:33:08AM -0400, David Raleigh Arnold wrote:
> It is also perfectly reasonable for a person who has been writing
> music for decades for it to make no sense. Why? Because it
> makes no sense, and never did.
Welcome to Western musical notation. If you want something to
m
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 01:34:28PM -0400, Kieren MacMillan wrote:
> I would just hope (and certainly voice my desire) that the powers that be
> — Han-Wen, Graham, etc. — would not add such a function to the base
> distribution, nor give it any serious face-time in the documentation.
Rest assured
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 04:30:58AM +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
> So I have had a look at the code and found
> scoreTitleMarkup = \markup \null
BTW, this would probably be better written as
scoreTitleMarkup = ##f
> But there is one last thing:
> How can I get the copyright notice on
Am Freitag, 28. August 2009 schrieb Jonathan Wilkes:
> It sounds like there is a wide discrepancy depending on machine/os/etc.
>
> Does anyone have any insight into how I could decrease this time on my
> winxp machine?
Half way through reading that sentence I wanted to say "install Linux". *d&h*
-
Hello,
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on the
following simple score:
\relative c' {
c4 d e fis
}
I'm on winxp sp3, pentium 1.7Ghz with 512mb ram and it consistently takes
7 seconds to complete, whether I do it on the command line or in
LilypondTool.
-Jo
Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
on a Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7400 @ 2.80GHz :
wilb...@sweelinck:~/ly/test$ echo "\\relative c' { c4 d e fis }" > test.ly
wilb...@sweelinck:~/ly/test$ time lilypond test
ok, this is the command I was looking for..
so...
on a Intel Cor
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 10:58, Kieren
MacMillan wrote:
> Hi David (et al),
>
> Just to be absolutely clear, the fallacy in your argument lies in the
> following statement:
>
>> It's necessary to consider the sound of the music,
>> *and not the conventional rules of printed scores*
>> when doing Lil
It sounds like there is a wide discrepancy depending on machine/os/etc.
Does anyone have any insight into how I could decrease this time on my
winxp machine?
I feel like if I could get it down to something close to one second, it
would be a lot easier to learn Lilypond.
Also: is there a way u
Op vrijdag 28 augustus 2009, schreef Federico Bruni:
> Frescobaldi does not give me timing information.
I just implemented this in SVN! ;-)
best regards,
Wilbert Berendsen
--
Frescobaldi, LilyPond editor for KDE: http://www.frescobaldi.org/
Nederlands LilyPond forum: http://www.lilypondforum.nl/
> Message: 3
> Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2009 19:24:51 +0100
> From: Graham Percival
> Subject: Re: Accidentals: Unwanted naturals
> To: Leonardo Herrera
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Message-ID: <20090825182451.gb29...@sapphire>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
>
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:0
I'm sure it is a little more, but not much ;-)
Thomas
Intel E6750 @ 2.66Ghz, 2 GM RAM
Windows Xp SP3, LilyPondTool
--
Processing `C:/LilyPondFiles/test/time.ly'
Parsing...
Interpreting music...
Preprocessing graphical objects...
Solving 1 page-breaking chunks...[1: 1 pages]
Drawing systems...
L
Alexander Kobel wrote Friday, August 28, 2009 10:11 AM
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Alexander Kobel wrote Friday, August 28, 2009 12:02 AM
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2009/8/25 Didi & MiMi Kanjahn :
I am trying to resize a score from A4 to A5.
Using
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 14)...
m
Jonathan Wilkes Friday, August 28, 2009 5:45 PM
Hello,
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond
on the
following simple score:
\relative c' {
c4 d e fis
}
I'm on winxp sp3, pentium 1.7Ghz with 512mb ram and it
consistently takes
7 seconds to complete, whether I
on a Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7400 @ 2.80GHz :
wilb...@sweelinck:~/ly/test$ echo "\\relative c' { c4 d e fis }" > test.ly
wilb...@sweelinck:~/ly/test$ time lilypond test
GNU LilyPond 2.13.1
Verwerken van `test.ly'
Ontleden...
test.ly:0: warning: geen \version uitd
Am Freitag, 28. August 2009 schrieb Jonathan Wilkes:
> Hello,
> I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on the
> following simple score:
>
> \relative c' {
> c4 d e fis
> }
>
> I'm on winxp sp3, pentium 1.7Ghz with 512mb ram and it consistently takes
> 7 seconds to com
Hi David (et al),
Just to be absolutely clear, the fallacy in your argument lies in the
following statement:
It's necessary to consider the sound of the music,
*and not the conventional rules of printed scores*
when doing Lilypond pitch input.
Quite the contrary, the "conventional rules o
Am Freitag, 28. August 2009 schrieb Frederick Dennis:
> > I'm creating scores for my choir and because some of us use duplex
> > printers,
>
> they would like an empty page at the beginning. So I thought "Why not have
> a
>
> > nice title page there?", But because the majority does not use duplex
>
On 28.08.2009, at 19:35, Federico Bruni wrote:
Jethro Van Thuyne wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on
the
following simple score:
It took me 4,474 seconds
How can you be so precise? :-)
OSX has a time comm
It took me 4,474 seconds
on Debian, Intel Core2Duo T7250 @ 2.00GHz with 2GB ram.
And with a version statement it takes 0,941 seconds...
Jethro.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi Jonathan,
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on the
following simple score:
\relative c' {
c4 d e fis
}
About 1.5 seconds on my MacBook 667GHz G5 w/1GB RAM.
Kieren.
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.
Jethro Van Thuyne wrote:
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on the
following simple score:
It took me 4,474 seconds
How can you be so precise? :-)
Frescobaldi does not give me timing information.
If I type in a termin
Hi David,
Whether we like it or not, there are going to be intelligent people
who misinterpret Lilypond's requirements in this case, and will
perhaps not want to believe that such sophisticated software
could be so naive/stupid/buggy/whatever as to
not take into account its own \key declaration.
David Rogers wrote:
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:03, Kieren
MacMillan wrote:
I can't remember who in this thread first suggested that when you play an
instrument you "follow the key signature", but this notion is silly — and
ultimately harmful (to music education).
That would be me.
David Rog
On 28.08.2009, at 18:45, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
Hello,
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond
on the
following simple score:
\relative c' {
c4 d e fis
}
I'm on winxp sp3, pentium 1.7Ghz with 512mb ram and it consistently
takes
7 seconds to complete, whethe
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Jonathan Wilkes wrote:
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on the
following simple score:
It took me 4,474 seconds
on winxp sp3, pentium 1.7Ghz with 512mb ram
on Debian, Intel Core2Duo T7250 @ 2.00GHz with 2GB ram.
Jethro.
___
Hello,
I'm curious how long it takes for other people to run lilypond on the
following simple score:
\relative c' {
c4 d e fis
}
I'm on winxp sp3, pentium 1.7Ghz with 512mb ram and it consistently takes
7 seconds to complete, whether I do it on the command line or in
LilypondTool.
-Jon
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 08:03, Kieren
MacMillan wrote:
> I can't remember who in this thread first suggested that when you play an
> instrument you "follow the key signature", but this notion is silly — and
> ultimately harmful (to music education).
That would be me.
> When you play a piano, if
Dear community,
sometimes, when I use the great hideCurves function (see at
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2009-05/msg00700.html)
I get, after typing
\hideCurvesFrom #'Staff.Accidental #'(0.3 . 0.003) #'(0 . 0)
the error message:
:9:365: In procedure ly:stencil-extent in expressi
You should be able to use the \cadenzaOn feature, as shown below:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.13/Documentation/user/lilypond-big-page#Unmetered-music
Jethro.
On Fri, 28 Aug 2009, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
Ik heb in alle documentatie gezocht naar een manier om "senza misura"
te realiseren,
dus g
David,
It is also perfectly reasonable for a person who has been writing
music for decades for it to make no sense. Why?
Because it makes no sense, and never did.
?
Why not a \followKeySignature command?
??
I can't remember who in this thread first suggested that when you
play an instr
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 4:33 PM, David Raleigh Arnold
wrote:
> It is also perfectly reasonable for a person who has been writing
> music for decades for it to make no sense. Why? Because it
> makes no sense, and never did.
>
> Why not a \followKeySignature command?
>
> It would require an "n" in
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ronald van Eunen
Date: 2009/8/28
Subject: Lilypond vraag: senza misura
To: han...@xs4all.nl
Beste Han-Wen,
De laatste maanden ben ik me aan het verdiepen in Lilypond.
Een fantastisch pakket wat mij betreft!
Ik heb in alle documentatie gezocht naar
On Tuesday 25 August 2009, James E. Bailey wrote:
> It is actually perfectly reasonable for a person completely new to
> notating music for this to not make sense.
It is also perfectly reasonable for a person who has been writing
music for decades for it to make no sense. Why? Because it
makes
>
>
>
> I'm creating scores for my choir and because some of us use duplex
> printers,
they would like an empty page at the beginning. So I thought "Why not have a
> nice title page there?", But because the majority does not use duplex
> printers, I want the default title still visible. (Also beca
Thanks, Kieren. Added to the archives.
>
>
> Thought I'd share this... it's a Scheme function I wrote to force
> system breaks at regular intervals (e.g., four measures per system is
> a popular jazz sheet music layout).
> Comments/improvements are welcome.
>
> Hope this helps someone else!
> Kiere
Hello,
2009/8/28 Nikolay Kirov
> Hello all!
>
> I'd like to produce tie in metronome mark:
>
> \tempo 8 \tie 8. = 80 (does not work)
>
> \tempo 8~8. = 80 (does not work)
>
> e8^\markup { \smaller \note #"8" #1 ~ \smaller \note #"8." #1 = 80 }
> (does not work)
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
followi
Hi all,
I seem to have an issue with the \partcombine and the \repeat percent
structure... The following lilypond extract does not produce my expected
output:
\version "2.12"
VoiceA = \relative c'' { \repeat percent 2 { g8. g16 g4 g8. g16 g4 } }
VoiceB = \relative c' { d8. d16 d4 d8. d16 d4
Hello all!
I'd like to produce tie in metronome mark:
\tempo 8 \tie 8. = 80 (does not work)
\tempo 8~8. = 80 (does not work)
e8^\markup { \smaller \note #"8" #1 ~ \smaller \note #"8." #1 = 80 }
(does not work)
Any suggestions?
Nikolay K.
--
Nikolay Kirov Kirov
http://www.math.bas.bg/~nki
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Alexander Kobel wrote Friday, August 28, 2009 12:02 AM
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2009/8/25 Didi & MiMi Kanjahn :
I am trying to resize a score from A4 to A5.
Using
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 14)...
most things bound to the staff scaled down nicely, but the
As far as I know, you can make the sweeps clear to your drummer by writing
them down as tied notes. Every note will represent the lenght of a brush
sweep.
So, for instance:
\drums {
\time 3/4
sn2^"brush" ~ sn4 ~ | sn4 ~ sn2
}
Jethro.
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009, craigbakalian wrote:
Hi,
Do
Alexander Kobel wrote Friday, August 28, 2009 12:02 AM
Valentin Villenave wrote:
2009/8/25 Didi & MiMi Kanjahn :
I am trying to resize a score from A4 to A5.
Using
\layout {
#(layout-set-staff-size 14)...
most things bound to the staff scaled down nicely, but the
distance of staff line
50 matches
Mail list logo
