It sounds like there is a wide discrepancy depending on machine/os/etc. Does anyone have any insight into how I could decrease this time on my winxp machine?
I feel like if I could get it down to something close to one second, it would be a lot easier to learn Lilypond. Also: is there a way using LilypondTool to set Lilypond to run every time I enter a barcheck? Thanks, Jonathan --- On Fri, 8/28/09, Thomas Scharkowski <t.scharkow...@t-online.de> wrote: > From: Thomas Scharkowski <t.scharkow...@t-online.de> > Subject: Re: Lilypond Speed > To: lilypond-user@gnu.org, "Jonathan Wilkes" <jancs...@yahoo.com> > Date: Friday, August 28, 2009, 8:59 PM > I'm sure it is a little more, but not > much ;-) > > Thomas > Intel E6750 @ 2.66Ghz, 2 GM RAM > Windows Xp SP3, LilyPondTool > > -- > Processing `C:/LilyPondFiles/test/time.ly' > Parsing... > Interpreting music... > Preprocessing graphical objects... > Solving 1 page-breaking chunks...[1: 1 pages] > Drawing systems... > Layout output to `time.ps'... > Converting to `./time.pdf'... > Processing time: 0 seconds > > > LilyPond ready. > > -- > _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
