It sounds like there is a wide discrepancy depending on machine/os/etc. 

Does anyone have any insight into how I could decrease this time on my 
winxp machine?

I feel like if I could get it down to something close to one second, it 
would be a lot easier to learn Lilypond.

Also: is there a way using LilypondTool to set Lilypond to run every 
time I enter a barcheck?

Thanks,
Jonathan


--- On Fri, 8/28/09, Thomas Scharkowski <t.scharkow...@t-online.de> wrote:

> From: Thomas Scharkowski <t.scharkow...@t-online.de>
> Subject: Re: Lilypond Speed
> To: lilypond-user@gnu.org, "Jonathan Wilkes" <jancs...@yahoo.com>
> Date: Friday, August 28, 2009, 8:59 PM
> I'm sure it is a little more, but not
> much ;-)
> 
> Thomas 
> Intel E6750 @ 2.66Ghz, 2 GM RAM
> Windows Xp SP3, LilyPondTool
> 
> --
> Processing `C:/LilyPondFiles/test/time.ly'
> Parsing...
> Interpreting music... 
> Preprocessing graphical objects...
> Solving 1 page-breaking chunks...[1: 1 pages]
> Drawing systems...
> Layout output to `time.ps'...
> Converting to `./time.pdf'...
> Processing time:  0  seconds
>            
>         
> LilyPond ready.       
>          
> --
> 





_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

Reply via email to