On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 01:59:01PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Agreed! However, I don't think it's a good idea to hide something that
> most people would expect to find in a good FAQ, as a level 2 section in
> the learning manual. My proposal is simply to include a "FAQ" link which
> is
Hey lilypond-users,
I am working on a scheme function that will automate the setting of
TupletNumber #'text with respect to the amount of measures in a given
system. Currently, this minimal example prints the 8 whole notes for each
system, whereas I would like it to print 2, 2, 2, 2 for the fo
> -Original Message-
> From: lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org
> [mailto:lilypond-user-bounces+nick.payne=internode.on@gnu.org] On
> Behalf Of Werner LEMBERG
> Sent: Thursday, 2 July 2009 10:33 PM
> To: elu...@gmail.com
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re:
Graham Percival wrote:
...oh there was various stuff (I'm sure I don't remember what) elided
here...
I didn't expect a reference to Nanoha on the -user mailist. (so
of course I had to add one myself ;)
Thank you for that:)
Cheers,
- Graham
Regards,
Patrick
__
Thanks, Nick.
I'll fiddle with it some and see how it works for me.
David
Nick Payne wrote:
Here's the function I use for indicating harmonics:
%===
==
harmonics = #(define-music-function (parser location text osp
9.1.2 on Ubuntu 8.04
Upgrades come later for Linux, but they get around in time.
David
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
- the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2
Not on Linux...
I'm using acroread 9.1.0 on xubuntu 9.04.
Jon
>>> - the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2
>> Not on Linux...
>
> I'm using acroread 9.1.0 on xubuntu 9.04.
Ah! Good to know.
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lil
On 7/2/09 1:41 AM, "Graham Percival" wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:50:14PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>>
>> Graham Percival wrote:
> "where is the gui" is unfortunately still common, but the
> new website and the 10.5 GUI work should fix that.
Actually, I beg to differ. Since th
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
- the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2
Not on Linux...
I'm using acroread 9.1.0 on xubuntu 9.04.
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://
> - the actual acrobat reader version on windows is 9.1.2
Not on Linux...
> - how did you convert from pdf to png (is it a snapshot, a
> conversion with another tool, something else?)
A simple screen snapshot of the two PDF viewer windows side by side.
> - what does it mean to have a scaling o
-Eluze wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF
files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I
strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or
a wrapper program like gv or gsview.
Have a look
>> Have a look at the attached image: the left part shows the rendering
>> result of a piece (compiled with lilypond 2.13.1) with gv (at 25%
>> scaling, using gs 8.64), and the right part is with acroread 8.1.5 (at
>> 58.6% scaling). What a difference.
>>
>
> Interesting and strange! I don't kno
Bertalan Fodor (LilyPondTool) wrote:
Yes, there is an "enhance thin lines" setting in Reader 9 (or perhaps in
8 as well), which should be turned off I think.
Good call! I never knew about this setting but it helps. The
barlines (for example) look much more natural without the enhanced
thin
Dear Lilyponders,
An acquaintance of mine from another venue, Jezra Lickter, has
written a Python script to convert .bww and .bmw files (Bagpipe
Music Writer format) to Lilypond format. I don't know anything
about bagpipe music, but I've tried the script on a few .bww files
and it seems to wo
Yes, there is an "enhance thin lines" setting in Reader 9 (or perhaps in
8 as well), which should be turned off I think.
Trevor Daniels wrote:
Werner LEMBERG wrote Thursday, July 02, 2009 7:42 AM
From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF
files with acroread or xpdf l
Graham Percival wrote:
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:22:11AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 "When thing's don't work" or
somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the section
on common mistakes of the FAQ) into "When things go wrong", I'd c
Werner LEMBERG wrote Thursday, July 02, 2009 7:42 AM
From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF
files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such
cases, I
strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file,
or
a wrapper program like gv or gs
Graham Percival wrote Thursday, July 02, 2009 9:27 AM
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:22:11AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 "When thing's don't work" or
somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the
section
on common mistakes of the FAQ) into "
Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
>
> From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF
> files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I
> strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or
> a wrapper program like gv or gsview.
>
> Have a look
E.g. LilyPondTool preview is better.
Original message
From: Martin Tarenskeen
Sent: 2 Jul 2009 10:18 +02:00
To: Werner LEMBERG
Cc:
Subject: Re: good rendering of PDF
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >From time to time, users complain that the d
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 10:22:11AM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 "When thing's don't work" or
> somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the section
> on common mistakes of the FAQ) into "When things go wrong", I'd claim
> that it's sti
Graham Percival wrote:
Agreed! That's why it goes in "when things go wrong".
Do you mean into the current LM 5.2 "When thing's don't work" or
somewhere else? If you prefer to rename the FAQ (or rather the section
on common mistakes of the FAQ) into "When things go wrong", I'd claim
that
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:42:44AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> >From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF
> files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I
> strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or
> a wrapper progr
> The "meow... yum" comment was about a cat eating the canary, since
> I like cats.
Aah. In what form do you like cats? Perhaps as cat juice? May I
call you Alf? :-)
Werner
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu
>From time to time, users complain that the display of lilypond PDF
files with acroread or xpdf looks awkward on screen. In such cases, I
strongly recommend to use ghostscript itself to view the PDF file, or
a wrapper program like gv or gsview.
Have a look at the attached image: the left part sh
On Wed, Jul 01, 2009 at 03:50:14PM +0200, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote:
>> I intend on really testing my claim that a FAQ merely
>> demonstrates problems in the docs.
> Why not view the FAQ as part of the docs?
Where do we draw the line for F? I mean, "how do I make
artificial
On Thu, Jul 02, 2009 at 08:50:02AM +0200, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
>
> > The "meow... yum" comment was about a cat eating the canary, since
> > I like cats.
>
> Aah. In what form do you like cats?
On my bed, and purring. :)
(... I said "on", not "in!")
> Perhaps as cat juice? May I call you Alf
27 matches
Mail list logo
