On 5/31/09 7:34 AM, "Johannes Schöpfer" wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> As I already said some time ago when I made my own chordnames functions, I
>> still believe chordnames should be seperated from chords, or at least chords
>> shouldn't produce chordnames since it'll never be clear. And the other way
>>
I'm confused trying to use scheme to create a function. I've tried
several things, but the current function (dysfunction?) and
application looks something like this:
% code snippet
\version "2.12.2"
firstNotes = \relative c' { c4 d e f }
first =
#(define-music-function
(parser location trans)
hi,
just one idea to think about:
if you read Werner Pöhlert's "Basic Harmoy" (a very thick volume) he
explains that every move from chord to chord is a fifth (= = half-step), so
if you want to produce consistent jazzchord names from given notes, the most
logical think would be to analyse the no
PS
somebody out there must know what "error code 2" in the lilypond-context
means ... I even searched the .el files, but no result
or is this an emacs error? would be at least interesting, if not helpfull to
find that out...
cheers
thomas
___
Hallo,
thanks to everybody for the help...I now compile the .lytex file on the
command line with lilypond-book (that works) and then use the resulting .tex
file in emacs ... not perfect, but finally I can start working with
latex/lilypond...
BTW ... I found a way to participate in this mailingli
Johannes Schöpfer wrote:
Hi,
As I already said some time ago when I made my own chordnames
functions, I still believe chordnames should be seperated from
chords, or at least chords shouldn't produce chordnames since it'll
never be clear. And the other way round there can also occur
problems,
Hi,
As I already said some time ago when I made my own chordnames functions, I
still believe chordnames should be seperated from chords, or at least chords
shouldn't produce chordnames since it'll never be clear. And the other way
round there can also occur problems, i.e. with C7alt., how sho
On 5/30/09 10:55 PM, "Brett Duncan" wrote:
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>> I assume that there would still have to be some means of creating
>>> exceptions. If someone wants chords named mainly in the Real Book style,
>>> but with minors notated slightly differently ( Cm / Cmi / C- ) for
>>> exa
Tao Cumplido wrote:
The list on Dolmetsch isn't too bad but it's a little confusing in my opinion.
I think it'd be better to categorize the ways in which a single chord note is
affected (or a set of notes) rather than naming all variations for each chord.
For example it lists three variations f
The list on Dolmetsch isn't too bad but it's a little confusing in my opinion.
I think it'd be better to categorize the ways in which a single chord note is
affected (or a set of notes) rather than naming all variations for each chord.
For example it lists three variations for a minor triad (m, m
Hi,
I'm wondering if there is an app who makes it able to find chord/finger
settings for piano easily.
I work on GNU/Linux.
\r
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
11 matches
Mail list logo
