On 4/25/09 5:38 PM, "Nick Payne" wrote:
> I'm putting together a book of pieces, and using a particular font for
> headers, footers, titles, subtitles, etc. The one place where I haven't
> figured out how to get that font used is for the header text for the table
> of contents that Lilypond cr
On 4/25/09 5:38 PM, "Nick Payne" wrote:
> I'm putting together a book of pieces, and using a particular font for
> headers, footers, titles, subtitles, etc. The one place where I haven't
> figured out how to get that font used is for the header text for the table
> of contents that Lilypond cr
In using the sample code from NR 3.2.4 Table Of Contents I get all my
page numbers as question marks. Even the example shows all the page
numbers are page 1. There is no info on how to get the page numbers to
increment, or how to manually insert the page numbers. (I did search the
archives and
On 4/25/09 3:38 PM, "-Eluze" wrote:
>
>
>
> Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> You use the Internals Reference. You find the object you want engraved
>> under 3.1 All layout objects: 3.1.111 TextSpanner.
>>
>> The IR tells you that TextSpanners are created by Dynamic_engraver,
>> New_dynamic
Hi Nick,
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Nick Payne wrote:
> I'm putting together a book of pieces, and using a particular font for
> headers, footers, titles, subtitles, etc. The one place where I haven't
> figured out how to get that font used is for the header text for the table
> of contents
I'm putting together a book of pieces, and using a particular font for
headers, footers, titles, subtitles, etc. The one place where I haven't
figured out how to get that font used is for the header text for the table
of contents that Lilypond creates. Each tocItem has the font I want by using
\ove
This reduction seems about right to me, comparing the sizes on the normal and
grace notes:
\version "2.12.2"
gfsn = {
\once \override Fingering #'font-size = #-8
\once \override StringNumber #'font-size = #-8
\once \override Fingering #'padding = #0.2
\once \over
For guitar scores you might like these as well. Very similar functions for
harmonics and string number indications over multiple notes.
Nick
> -Original Message-
> From: Jonathan Kulp [mailto:jonlancek...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 25 April 2009 21:47
> To: Nick Payne
> Cc: 'Allan Spagn
Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> You use the Internals Reference. You find the object you want engraved
> under 3.1 All layout objects: 3.1.111 TextSpanner.
>
> The IR tells you that TextSpanners are created by Dynamic_engraver,
> New_dynamic_engraver, and Text_spanner_engraver.
>
> So then you
On 4/25/09 2:36 PM, "Pekka Siponen" wrote:
> Indeed it (suffix position) is a personal preference, and not correct
> most likely. I find that there is no standard for chord names, they have
> been around only for a short time historically, and mostly everything is
> based on personal preferenc
Having worked on the docs for 4 years and approximately three
thousand hours, you really don't need to convince me. Just
convince others -- and perhaps yourself -- that it's worth getting
involved. My work at this point is a meta-contributor: I
contribute (teach) people how to contribute to lily
Indeed it (suffix position) is a personal preference, and not correct
most likely. I find that there is no standard for chord names, they have
been around only for a short time historically, and mostly everything is
based on personal preferences.. as are all traditions when you go back
far enou
Looks great, Marc! *Very* nicely done.
On 4/25/09 4:06 AM, "Marc Hohl" wrote:
> Hello tablature users*,
>
>
> 3) some more tunings are defined:
>guitar-seven-string-tuning
>guitar-drop-d-tuning
>bass-four-string-tuning
>bass-drop-d-tuning
>bass-five-string-tuning
>ba
On 4/25/09 12:52 PM, "Pekka Siponen" wrote:
> Here are some thoughts about the default chords in LilyPond:
>
> 1. The suffixes should not be scaled (see attachment). The weight of the
> smaller character gets too light if it is simply scaled down from the
> original font.
Thanks for making a
On 4/25/09 1:31 PM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> Perhaps the point I was trying to make got lost in my slightly
> facetious reply: if we're talking about LSR snippets which are in the
> docs, the LSR editor must be mindful of the fact that editing such
> examples in LSR may have no effect, since
2009/4/25 Neil Puttock :
> Perhaps the point I was trying to make got lost in my slightly
> facetious reply: if we're talking about LSR snippets which are in the
> docs, the LSR editor must be mindful of the fact that editing such
> examples in LSR may have no effect, since they can be shadowed by
2009/4/25 Graham Percival :
> On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:22:56AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>>
>> On 4/25/09 9:37 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
>>
>> > 2009/4/23 Jonathan Kulp :
>> >> Graham Percival wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> 1. Log in to LSR as an editor. (I remember the discussion now;
>> >>> this i
Here are some thoughts about the default chords in LilyPond:
1. The suffixes should not be scaled (see attachment). The weight of the
smaller character gets too light if it is simply scaled down from the
original font.
2. The suffix should be top-aligned with the preceding characted.
3. The sharp
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:22:56AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote:
>
> On 4/25/09 9:37 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
>
> > 2009/4/23 Jonathan Kulp :
> >> Graham Percival wrote:
> >>
> >>> 1. Log in to LSR as an editor. (I remember the discussion now;
> >>> this isn't your fault)
> >>>
> >>> 2. F
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 06:22:28PM +0100, Gerard McConnell wrote:
> "The current person responsible for LSR also happens to be the most
> active patch-reviewer. Do you *really* want me to ask him to stop
> working on patches (i.e. new features, bug fixes, etc) and waste
> his time playing web-2.0
On 4/25/09 9:37 AM, "Neil Puttock" wrote:
> 2009/4/23 Jonathan Kulp :
>> Graham Percival wrote:
>>
>>> 1. Log in to LSR as an editor. (I remember the discussion now;
>>> this isn't your fault)
>>>
>>> 2. Find the "tags" section for each snippet.
>>>
>>> 3. Click on the drop-down menus,
I've been looking at the Re: date in footer thread; I can understand how the
experts get annoyed. They're doing lots of
volunteer work to develop what is a really beautiful (but horrendously
difficult to learn) program, and figure that the rest of
us should be doing our bit to sort out the doc
>> I eventually noticed that I had accidentally typed
>>
>> -\tweak #'extra-ofset
>>
>> instead of
>>
>> -\tweak #'extra-offset
>>
>> but this did not generate any warning. Looks like this is a general
>> thing with \tweak, as I tried changing \tweak #'color to \tweak
>> #'colon and got no warning
2009/4/23 Jonathan Kulp :
> Graham Percival wrote:
>
>> 1. Log in to LSR as an editor. (I remember the discussion now;
>> this isn't your fault)
>>
>> 2. Find the "tags" section for each snippet.
>>
>> 3. Click on the drop-down menus, and select the relevant tags.
>>
>> 4. There is no #4.
>
>
2009/4/22 Carl Sorensen :
> The IR tells you that TextSpanners are created by Dynamic_engraver,
> New_dynamic_engraver, and Text_spanner_engraver.
Hmm, it just goes to show that you can't always rely on what the IR
says: only the Text_spanner_engraver creates them. :)
I'll remove the bogus entri
2009/4/23 Nick Payne :
> I was trying to move a TextSpanner with \tweak and couldn't figure out why
> it wouldn't move. I eventually noticed that I had accidentally typed
>
> -\tweak #'extra-ofset
>
> instead of
>
> -\tweak #'extra-offset
>
> but this did not generate any warning. Looks like this i
2009/4/21 Nick Payne :
> Fingering indications on grace notes doesn't shrink to be proportional to
> the reduced size of the grace note, and the full size indication looks
> excessively large alongside the note. It's easy enough to override - using
> \override Fingering #'font-size = #-8 seems abou
Jonathan Kulp schrieb:
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
octave. I think there were only two examples in tablature.ly that
didn't use the "treble_8" clef for guitar. All the other clefs
(including the "bass_8" for bass guitar) were correct.
Sorry I meant to say in "tablature-test1.ly"
Jon
Yes, you are r
Jonathan Kulp wrote:
octave. I think there were only two examples in tablature.ly that
didn't use the "treble_8" clef for guitar. All the other clefs
(including the "bass_8" for bass guitar) were correct.
Sorry I meant to say in "tablature-test1.ly"
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathanku
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Marc Hohl wrote:
Hello tablature users*,
after some days of struggling with lilypond's internals, I have
created a file tablature.ly
Wow, I am very happy about this! I'm gonna test it for sure.
Thanks Marc and Carl!
@David could you make some progress with the be
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:31:14PM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 10:13 AM
>
>> Eh?!?! You want to tell people to put articulation and dynamic
>> marks after the duration, before they've been told how to do
>> articulations and dynamics? Remember t
Kieren MacMillan wrote:
Hi Nick,
With that as a model I was able to generalize it to a music function
Nice!
+1. That's a very cool piece of code!
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gn
Nick Payne wrote:
I have attached the barre and half barre functions I use that work with
2.12, and your test.ly modified to use them.
Nick
Those are nice barre indicators, Nick. Thanks. :)
Jon
--
Jonathan Kulp
http://www.jonathankulp.com
___
li
Graham Percival wrote Saturday, April 25, 2009 10:13 AM
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:41:26AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
If you have an idea for a gener
Hi Nick,
With that as a model I was able to generalize it to a music function
Nice! Even better would be to take the music as a parameter, compute
the correct rightY (using the relative position of the endpoints of
the first and last stem) and automagically adjust -- that, however,
is be
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 12:06:07PM +0200, Marc Hohl wrote:
> after some days of struggling with lilypond's internals, I have created
> a file tablature.ly
Fantastic work! This is exactly the kind of thing I was hoping
would happen. Not from a tab-specific viewpoint, but from a
general "getting
Marc Hohl wrote:
Hello tablature users*,
after some days of struggling with lilypond's internals, I have
created a file tablature.ly
Wow, I am very happy about this! I'm gonna test it for sure.
Thanks Marc and Carl!
@David could you make some progress with the bends and stuff?
Kind regar
Hello tablature users*,
after some days of struggling with lilypond's internals, I have created
a file tablature.ly
which supports:
1) two commands to switch between the display style:
\tabNumbersOnly shows only the mubers,
\tabFullNotation shows up everything (as it is the default in
\Ta
trevor, graham,
On 25 Apr 2009, at 10:41, Trevor Daniels wrote:
Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
Hmm. I was initially thinking of 3.1.2, but that subsection
(actually, the entire section) is really talking about
*macroscopic* style. I mean, it refers back to the definition
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:41:26AM +0100, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
>>> Graham Percival wrote:
If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax is
"pitch
Graham Percival wrote Friday, April 24, 2009 4:42 PM
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 04:10:37PM +0200, Simon Bailey wrote:
Graham Percival wrote:
If you have an idea for a general clarification that the syntax
is
"pitch duration other", then I'm all for it. If it's a simple
"you need to put the '
41 matches
Mail list logo
