On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:22:56AM -0600, Carl D. Sorensen wrote: > > On 4/25/09 9:37 AM, "Neil Puttock" <n.putt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2009/4/23 Jonathan Kulp <jonlancek...@gmail.com>: > >> Graham Percival wrote: > >> > >>> 1. Log in to LSR as an editor. (I remember the discussion now; > >>> this isn't your fault) > >>> > >>> 2. Find the "tags" section for each snippet. > >>> > >>> 3. Click on the drop-down menus, and select the relevant tags. > >>> > >>> 4. There is no #4. > >> > >> Is "save" #4? > >> > >> Thanks for the rundown, Graham. As you've said, this is very easy and I > >> figured it out myself as reported in previous email... > > > > 4. Note that one of the snippets isn't tagged as `docs', which means > > it's in input/new. > > > > 5. Find the snippet in input/new, and add the tag there instead. > > > > 6. Scratch #5, since the snippet shouldn't be in input/new in the first > > place.
Those steps 4-6 are when you're looking at git. My steps 1-4 (including the "save snippet") are strictly for LSR stuff, which is all that I'm claiming is trivial. I would *never* claim that git is trivial. If a snippet isn't in LSR, then the LSR editor -- at least, the type of "LSR editor" that I keep on wanting a newbie to be -- doesn't worry about it. People with git access mess around in git; non-developers mess around in LSR. The whole point of LSR was to allow for this division of labour; if developers are using the web interface of LSR, then it means the whole thing was a waste[1]. [1] Again, quite literally. We could have -- and I'm still not convinced that we *shouldn't have* -- junked the idea of LSR, and gone with small files in git. Much simpler for everybody involved. But no, I let myself get talked into the web 2.0 / wiki garbage, and went along with LSR as a compromise. Hundreds of hours of development time later (LSR infrastructure, importing snippet infrastructor, build system stuff, etc etc), we *still* don't have non-developers handling LSR. I will admit that we've started to see submissions from users, which is definitely nice... but I don't think we've passed the break-even point yet. Cheers, - Graham _______________________________________________ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
