> Another thing: c\turn only places turn above c, thus c\turn e must
> be played as d16 c b c e4 . But I want to write a turn between c and
> e, thus played as c8 d32 c b c e4 . How to do that?
I can imagine that the former has the \turn positioned over the note,
while the latter has the \turn bet
Thanks! Great!
But I would like to ask one more question.
If the distance between two notes is larger, I think the amount of the
curve should be a little larger too. Can this be changed, generally if
possible, too?
2009/3/30 Neil Puttock :
> 2009/3/30 Stefan Thomas :
>> Dear community,
>> in the b
Hi Peter and Hu,
Turn after a note I write as:
<< { c4 d4} \\ {s8. s16\turn s4}>>
This *looks* right, (adjust the s8. and s16 to move the turn; they
must add up to a crotchet).
It doesn;t sound in the MIDI output, and there's no easy way to
make it.
Why not just offset the turn?
\ver
Turn after a note I write as:
<< { c4 d4} \\ {s8. s16\turn s4}>>
This *looks* right, (adjust the s8. and s16 to move the turn; they
must add up to a crotchet).
It doesn;t sound in the MIDI output, and there's no easy way to make
it.
--
Dr Peter Chubb http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au peterc
On 3/30/09 4:58 PM, "Ossie Wilson Snr" wrote:
>
> And yes, Win98 users are stuck at 2.8.
> I do have computers with much faster chips and later versions, but I am still
> waiting for a stable version to appear. I thought it would be 2.12 but now
> there is talk of 2.14 in the next couple of
Have anyone figure out what are the difference of these ornaments I refferred
yesterday?
Another thing: c\turn only places turn above c, thus c\turn e must be played as
d16 c b c e4 . But I want to write a turn between c and e, thus played as c8
d32 c b c e4 . How to do that?
Haipeng
_
Good Morning Robin
Robin Bannister wrote :-
After a cursory look, I would say this file is badly mangled as regards key
signatures.
In part one at bar 29 it helps to say
\key dfinstead of\key cs
because the subseqent notes are e.g. df, gf, ...
The original key is d
> -Original Message-
> From: Neil Puttock [mailto:n.putt...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 31 March 2009 07:07
> To: Nick Payne
> Cc: lilypond-user@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Fingering padding with accidentals
>
> 2009/3/30 Nick Payne :
> > The padding that is applied to fingering on the left whe
2009/3/29 Patrick McCarty :
> Since the mf/ directory is changed so infrequently, it would be nice
> if the fonts could be recompiled whenever mf/*.mf is changed.
>
> That way we won't ever have this problem again.
>
> Good idea?
Definitely.
Regards,
Neil
__
> signumcongruentiae my god, what's this!?
`Signum congruentiae', the `sign for similarity', is used e.g. by
Palestrina to indicate the entrance points of the voices in a canon if
it is written as a single line only.
> BTW, how to write "bebbung" (trembling) using Lilypond?
The word is called
2009/3/30 Stefan Thomas :
> Dear community,
> in the below quoted snippet the position of the tie isn't convincing,
> in my opinion. It should be al little further apart from the
> notes. Off couse I could type \override Tie #'staff-position all the
> time, but I would be interested in tweaking it
2009/3/30 Nick Payne :
> The padding that is applied to fingering on the left when there is an
> accidental is greater than when there is no accidental. From my measurements
> it seems to default to 0.5 staff units from a note but 0.7 units from an
> accidental, which looks odd to me. Is it possibl
It would be trivial, but as the md5sums would be autogenerated, so it
does not buy any protection against anything.
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:46 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> I believe we can consider downloads from lilypond
The padding that is applied to fingering on the left when there is an
accidental is greater than when there is no accidental. From my measurements
it seems to default to 0.5 staff units from a note but 0.7 units from an
accidental, which looks odd to me. Is it possible to reduce the default
padding
Am 30.03.2009 um 17:16 schrieb Pekka Siponen:
I'm not top posting.
I find the behavior with lyrics and alternative repeats somewhat
illogical..
For me the logical thing would be something like:
%---
\version "2.12.2"
\score {
\new GrandStaff {
\new Staff {
<<
\new Vo
I was able to download winMd5Sum for free from http://www.nullriver.com/.
Open the application (I have a shortcut on the desktop and just double click
the icon) and put in the path\filename for the file and the MD5Sum and go
for it.
Ralph
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 6:12 AM, Christ van Willegen
wrote
> I'm not top posting.
I find the behavior with lyrics and alternative repeats somewhat illogical..
For me the logical thing would be something like:
%---
\version "2.12.2"
\score {
\new GrandStaff {
\new Staff {
<<
\new Voice = "alku" \relative c' {
\re
Ossie Wilson wrote:
I have attached the Ly file
After a cursory look, I would say this file is
badly mangled as regards key signatures.
In part one at bar 29 it helps to say
\key dfinstead of\key cs
because the subseqent notes are e.g. df, gf, ...
Also part one should declare _
On 3/30/09 5:07 AM, "Ossie Wilson Snr" wrote:
Ossie,
The snippet in question appears to be broken. I'll try to get you a fixed
version in a day or two.
Thanks,
Carl
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mail
Dear community,
in the below quoted snippet the position of the tie isn't convincing,
in my opinion. It should be al little further apart from the
notes. Off couse I could type \override Tie #'staff-position all the
time, but I would be interested in tweaking it generally.
Is there a possibilitie?
On 3/30/09 5:07 AM, "Ossie Wilson Snr" wrote:
> Good evening David and Francisco
>
> I tried the snippet in my Ly file but there was no change to the pdf file
> output. There were no errors flagged in the Log file just a record of
> straight-forward processing.
>
> I then tried the snipp
Excellent!
you forgot a #' in front of the font-size I think though. after
adding that it worked like a charm.
thanks for helping a poor newbie :)
Roel
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 13:38, Mats Bengtsson wrote:
> It should work to add the following lines at the top of your file
>
> startAcciaccatur
It should work to add the following lines at the top of your file
startAcciaccaturaMusic = {
s1*0(
\override Stem #'stroke-style = #"grace"
\override TextScript font-size = #-2
}
stopAcciaccaturaMusic = {
\revert Stem #'stroke-style
\revert TextScript font-size
s1*0)
}
/
Good evening David and Francisco
I tried the snippet in my Ly file but there was no change to the pdf file
output. There were no errors flagged in the Log file - just a record of
straight-forward processing.
I then tried the snippet example but using English notation for the notes
involved
Hey guys,
Is there any way to change the fontsize for textscript above
acciaccatura for an entire piece? I have drum sticking under it
but I'd like it to be smaller is it's a grace note or acciaccatura.
Regards,
Roel
___
lilypond-user mailing list
li
Joerg Anders writes:
> Therefore, I first separate the notes according to the instrument
> which shall play them. Unfortunately, this algorithm sorts 4 flutes
> which appear in 4 tracks into one staff :-((
Aha! But then the workaround is simple: just assign each track a
different instrument. Hav
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Patrick McCarty wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>>
>> I believe we can consider downloads from lilypond.org to be safe,
>> but Dirk does have a point: how does he verify [binary] downloads?
>
> Perhaps we could add a colu
Grammostola Rosea wrote:
Marc Hohl wrote:
Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/3/28 Grammostola Rosea :
Hi,
I want to get invisible slurs in tablature... how?
Simply \override Slur #'transparent in the same way as you've done for
the other objects in your TabStaff con
Marc Hohl wrote:
Grammostola Rosea schrieb:
Neil Puttock wrote:
2009/3/28 Grammostola Rosea :
Hi,
I want to get invisible slurs in tablature... how?
Simply \override Slur #'transparent in the same way as you've done for
the other objects in your TabStaff context.
Why aren't you usin
Hi all!
Here some remarks by the author of NtEd concerning sib2ly
and the mail by Johan Vromans:
"NtEd has problems importing the MIDI. It seems to insist on putting
the 4 voices on a single staff."
Indeed, NtEd is the one and only LINUX software which distributes
the MIDI notes onto multip
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 10:26:29AM +0200, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote:
>
> I believe we can consider downloads from lilypond.org to be safe,
> but Dirk does have a point: how does he verify [binary] downloads?
Perhaps we could add a column with md5sums of all the installers to
the download page? Thi
Op zondag 29-03-2009 om 10:38 uur [tijdzone +], schreef dirk van der
eerden:
Hi Dirk,
[dit is een engelstalige lijst, kun je in het vervolg hier Engels
praten?]
> probeer 2.12 te installeren, maar krijg waarschuwing uitgever onbekend, geen
> digitale handtekening. Wordt geadviseerd niet te
Hello:
I'm about help both Freedots and the Japanese project BrailleMuse to
implement their musicxml to braille program (Valentin knows, one is an online
server under an unknown license :-), and the other a GUI under GNU, but too
young). My plan is, to write a score with many kind of notations
2009/3/30 Ossie Wilson Snr :
> My current problem is in transposing a song (for a grand daughter) and a
> whole bunch of double accidentals and natural/accidental combinations have
> turned up in the resultant printout – not too good for fast recognition by
> the accompanist (according to my wife).
2009/3/30 Ossie Wilson Snr :
> I am using LP 2.8.6 on a Windows 98 300MHz machine.
>
>
>
> My current problem is in transposing a song (for a grand daughter) and a
> whole bunch of double accidentals and natural/accidental combinations have
> turned up in the resultant printout – not too good for f
Kieren MacMillan writes:
> > I found one hack to accomplish this: give the third note a 'lyric'
> > syllable consisting of a single hard space. But I'm sure there are
> > better ways.
>
> I don't know if it's "better", but I've defined
>
> nullLyric = \markup \null
Yes this is better. It d
36 matches
Mail list logo
