Re: Shouldn't articulation 'stick' to note-heads?

Am 17.07.2008 um 07:10 schrieb George_: hi guys I was wondering if there were a way to make articulation 'stick' to a notehead, no matter where it is? I use 2.11.49 on XP, and I have a two-part melody, the lower voice is to be played staccato, like so: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18501666

Re: Shouldn't articulation 'stick' to note-heads?

Am 17.07.2008 um 07:10 schrieb George_: hi guys I was wondering if there were a way to make articulation 'stick' to a notehead, no matter where it is? I use 2.11.49 on XP, and I have a two-part melody, the lower voice is to be played staccato, like so: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18501666

Shouldn't articulation 'stick' to note-heads?

hi guys I was wondering if there were a way to make articulation 'stick' to a notehead, no matter where it is? I use 2.11.49 on XP, and I have a two-part melody, the lower voice is to be played staccato, like so: http://www.nabble.com/file/p18501666/1.jpg Except in the lily output, the staccat

Shouldn't articulation '

-- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Shouldn%27t-articulation-%27-tp18501606p18501606.html Sent from the Gnu - Lilypond - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org http://lists.g

GDP: NR 1.5 Simultaneous, second draft

I'm happy to announce the second public draft of NR 1.5 Simultaneous notes. If you haven't already done so, please proofread this section carefully -- we want the docs to be as good as possible for 2.12. GDP website: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ The GDP website now contains a summary of the cu

New LilyPondTool version coming soon

Dear LilyPond users, I have good news: a new LilyPondTool version is coming soon, it is under testing now. If you think that some not so hard feature would be very important to be included, please let me know in private mail. I will then later summarize the suggestions and choose the one sugge

Re: I love editor arguments:)

Am 16.07.2008 um 21:20 schrieb Patrick Horgan: I believe the truth is more along the lines of duckling imprinting-- you know that ducklings imprint on whatever moves first and think that that thing, duck, dog or person, is mommy. We do the same with whatever editor we learned well enough

GDP: NR 1.3 Expressive, first draft

I'm happy to announce the first draft of NR 1.3 Expressive! Thanks go to Patrick. Please proofread this carefully; if you find any mistakes, omissions, or anything that's unclear, please post it here! GDP website: http://web.uvic.ca/~gperciva/ Cheers, - Graham _

I love editor arguments:)

I believe the truth is more along the lines of duckling imprinting--you know that ducklings imprint on whatever moves first and think that that thing, duck, dog or person, is mommy. We do the same with whatever editor we learned well enough to work with first. For me it was vi. I've learned

Re: \tag can't follow \lyricsto

2008/7/16 Nicolas Sceaux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > You can conditionnaly insert music using a music function. Awesome! Can you (or Roman) write a LSR snippet with this great function? Cheers, Valentin ___ lilypond-user mailing list lilypond-user@gnu.org

Re: How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

2008/7/16 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > What you need here is a printer's mark, not an apostrophe, which is what the > ' character on your keyboard is. On a macintosh, to get that character, you > use shift+option=] and it creates the character ' as opposed to the ' which > is just a hash

Re: How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

Am 16.07.2008 um 16:45 schrieb Francisco Vila: Thank you, James and Roman, the concat solves the undesired space problem. Now, if several words are in italics, I'm sure there is a better form than to repeat \markup{\italic...} for each syllable. Do you know of any? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz

Re: How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

Thank you, James and Roman, the concat solves the undesired space problem. Now, if several words are in italics, I'm sure there is a better form than to repeat \markup{\italic...} for each syllable. Do you know of any? -- Francisco Vila. Badajoz (Spain) http://www.paconet.org __

Changing notes based on fingerings

The next issue in trying to extend Lilypond for my instrument is that I want to change things in the Note based on the text in the Fingering. Here's an example, this displayMusic call results in the make-music call that is after it. I have code working that gives me the "2" from the FingeringEvent

Re: \tag can't follow \lyricsto

Le 16 juil. 08 à 13:31, Roman Stawski a écrit : The command order I'm using is from a really old template that I've been using for years without problems. I came across your formulation when checking an answer to another post on the bugs list. Looks as if I'll have to update my templates. (Who'

Re: How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

Francisco Vila wrote: Hello all, Attached is what I want and what I get; in a single note we have: - last letter of a previous word - an italic apostrophe - first letter of the next word, also italic Not only I cannot join all of this onto a single note, I also obtain errors for the next syll

Re: Stupid of me. Re: How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am Mittwoch, 16. Juli 2008 schrieb Francisco Vila: > 2008/7/16 Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > The complete code of the attempt is: > > > > \version "2.11.52" > > { \time 3/8 \autoBeamOff a'8 a'16 a' a' a' } > > \addlyrics { bien ha -- y \marku

Re: How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

Am 16.07.2008 um 13:35 schrieb Francisco Vila: Hello all, Attached is what I want and what I get; in a single note we have: - last letter of a previous word - an italic apostrophe - first letter of the next word, also italic Not only I cannot join all of this onto a single note, I also obtai

Stupid of me. Re: How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

2008/7/16 Francisco Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > The complete code of the attempt is: > > \version "2.11.52" > { \time 3/8 \autoBeamOff a'8 a'16 a' a' a' } > \addlyrics { bien ha -- y \markup{ \italic "'a" } -- que -- ya } And the solution is to put the 'y' inside of the markup, \addlyrics { bien

How to join plain + markup text in a single syllable?

Hello all, Attached is what I want and what I get; in a single note we have: - last letter of a previous word - an italic apostrophe - first letter of the next word, also italic Not only I cannot join all of this onto a single note, I also obtain errors for the next syllable (unfinished hyphen).

Re: \tag can't follow \lyricsto

Trevor Daniels wrote OK, I see what you are trying to do. The error is that the order of the commands in the lyrics line is wrong, and the \new Lyrics command should be followed by { .. } just like \new Staff is. Then it works fine, like this: \new Staff { \new Voice = "dirge" { c''1 } } \n

Re: Slur ending repeated

2008/7/13 Kieren MacMillan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > For the record, this is not a "bug"... you are asking for a new feature. Hi Kieren, can you help me adding this as an Enhancement request to the tracker, by writing a minimal snippet and description? Cheers, Valentin __

Re: \tag can't follow \lyricsto

2008/7/16 Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > the mode switching commands (like lyricsto) are a bit erratic. > Sometimes, the parser needs to look ahead to determine what to do > next, and then it can happen that the next token is read in the wrong > mode. This may lead to interactions like t

Re: \tag can't follow \lyricsto

Nicolas Sceaux wrote Le 15 juil. 08 à 21:02, Trevor Daniels a écrit : Roman Stawski wrote << \new Staff { \new Voice = "dirge" { c''1 } } \lyricsto "dirge" \new Lyrics { Whoops } \tag #'harmony \new Staff { a'1 } >> OK, I see what you are trying to do. The error is that the order of the