> Actually, it is as a pianist too that I proposed this change several
> weeks ago... (and yes, following the discussions on -devel is quite
> interesting, it took me to a whole new level when I first subscribed
> to it).
Me too. Being a professional piano player, I don't oppose to the new
names
On Jul 8, 2008, at 4:26 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:19:31 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2008/08/08 15:52 -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote:
I installed 2.11.51 (ppc version) on my Intel iMac running 10.5.4.
Convert-ly works on the iMac and the updated .ly
2008/7/9 Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> No. No, no, absolutely no. That's a long-term support nightmare.
> I can't stop you from adding it to LSR, but such snippets will
> *never* be accepted with the "docs" tag.
Nor are they meant to be -- and I wasn't offering to add them myself.
The
On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 01:24:34 +0200
"Valentin Villenave" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And Mark has a good point: we can even have a "alternate predefined
> commands" bunch of snippets in the LSR, in case we'd like to maintain
> some commands such as \fatText, \sustainDown etc.
No. No, no, absolute
2008/7/8 James E. Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I vote, as a pianist, for sustainDown/sustainUp. Who's with me?
Oh, please don't make it a "with me" question... Understanding your
point of view and sharing or not doesn't make anyone "with" or
"without" you.
Actually, it is as a pianist too that
2008/7/7 Sebastiano Vigna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Guys, please post this kind of problems. There was simply a wrong update so
> that the index wasn't rebuilt since days. So new snippets were showing up in
> the browsing list (because they are picked from the database in that case)
> but not in a se
2008/7/7 Mats Bengtsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I think I have seen some clever solution on the mailing list,
> that redefined the function that draws the stem, in order to
> automatically get it correctly placed. I don't remember if it
> was a slash or a cross or something else that was placed on
>
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 23:19:31 +0200
John Mandereau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2008/08/08 15:52 -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> > I installed 2.11.51 (ppc version) on my Intel iMac running 10.5.4.
> > Convert-ly works on the iMac and the updated .ly file compiles
> > correctly (from the comm
On 2008/08/08 15:52 -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> > On 2008/07/08 09:42 -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> >> ...is not my friend.
> >>
> >> Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
> >>
> Additional info-
>
> I installed 2.11.51 (ppc version) on my Intel iMac running 10.5.4.
> Convert-ly works on the
On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:34 AM, John Mandereau wrote:
On 2008/07/08 09:42 -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote:
...is not my friend.
Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
convert-ly fails with the following messsage
@rule ((0, 1, 9), _ ('\\header { key = concat + with +
operator }'))
Additiona
On Jul 8, 2008, at 11:34 AM, John Mandereau wrote:
On 2008/07/08 09:42 -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote:
...is not my friend.
Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
convert-ly fails with the following messsage
@rule ((0, 1, 9), _ ('\\header { key = concat + with +
operator }'))
This is st
On Jul 8, 2008, at 2:01 PM, Wilbert Berendsen wrote:
Op dinsdag 8 juli 2008, schreef Stan Sanderson:
...is not my friend.
Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
convert-ly fails with the following messsage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resou
On Tue, 08 Jul 2008 16:55:11 +0200
"James E. Bailey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> See, this is why I should subscribe to the development list___
If you're concerned about development, then yes. You might want
to look at the archives, where you'll see a whole bloody MONTH for
this discussion, mul
On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:01:03 +0200
Wilbert Berendsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Op dinsdag 8 juli 2008, schreef Stan Sanderson:
> > ...is not my friend.
> >
> > Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
> >
>
> Are you using Python 2.4 or newer? I thought configure already
> requires Python to be 2.
Op dinsdag 8 juli 2008, schreef Stan Sanderson:
> ...is not my friend.
>
> Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
>
> convert-ly fails with the following messsage
>
> > Traceback (most recent call last):
> > File "/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-
> > ly", line 43, in ?
>
On 2008/07/08 09:42 -0500, Stan Sanderson wrote:
> ...is not my friend.
>
> Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
>
> convert-ly fails with the following messsage
> > @rule ((0, 1, 9), _ ('\\header { key = concat + with +
> > operator }'))
This is strange: does this unexpected linebreak a
% have a look at the following score
% containing lines for kb, tb (in C) and sax (in B)
% see set chordChanges
\version "2.10.33"
% A4-Papier, oberen Rand verringern
\paper {
#(set-paper-size "a4")
top-margin = -0.5\cm
}
% angenehme Höhe der Notenzeilen
#(set-global-staff-size
On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 16:55 +0200, James E. Bailey wrote:
> See, this is why I should subscribe to the development list…
> While changing sustainDown/sustainUp to sustainOn/sustainOff makes
> sense in the lilypond internals, it really doesn't make sense
> musically. No one is going to confuse p
See, this is why I should subscribe to the development list…
While changing sustainDown/sustainUp to sustainOn/sustainOff makes
sense in the lilypond internals, it really doesn't make sense
musically. No one is going to confuse placing a sustain marking above
the staff. They don't go there,
...is not my friend.
Mac OS 10.4.11, PPC, Lilypond 2.11.51
convert-ly fails with the following messsage
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "/Applications/LilyPond.app/Contents/Resources/bin/convert-
ly", line 43, in ?
import convertrules
File "/Applications/LilyPond.app/Content
Hugo:
> When I compile my lytex file with a piano music example, it seems that
> LaTex shrinks the space between systems, so the output is not ok. The
> systems looks too tight. When I compile only the music example, the
> distance between the system are ok.
>
> Note that I am talking about the d
Jesse:
> I'm trying to duplicate a renaissance Palestrina-type score from a
> book called "The Craft of Modal Counterpoint" by Thomas Benjamin. I
> want to remove the barlines from the height of the staff but keep the
> barline spanners that span the space between each staff in a score.
> How can I
Dear lilypond-users,
I'va tried something else with the cluster stems. I now understand better,
how I can change the stems for clusters, but it is a lot of work. Therefore
I would like to know:
In the below quoted example I use two different cluster chords. The first
one looks good, but the second
23 matches
Mail list logo