Paul Harouff wrote:
You didn't understand my question.
I have 12 verses interspersed between the scores. I want to type all of the
verses in one spot at the beginning of the file, just like choral lyrics. I
don't want to have to search the file and edit every \markup to revise the
text every w
Nice catch! Thanks, added as
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=281
Cheers,
- Graham
PS if you have created a minimal example like this, and have read the
relevant page of the docs, it's safe to assume that it's a bug and you
can send it directly to the bugs list.
Roland G
Thanks for taking a look at this.
I thought about inserting invisible bar lines to allow more natural
breaking on long strings of lyric text. But for that to look right,
there would need to be a way to optionally re-print the reciting tone
at the beginning of the new line. I don't know if
You didn't understand my question.
I have 12 verses interspersed between the scores. I want to type all of the
verses in one spot at the beginning of the file, just like choral lyrics. I
don't want to have to search the file and edit every \markup to revise the
text every week.
Is there a way to
Thanks for responding. Agreed, I did not follow your advice exactly
and in this email I have included a complete example.
I used the text \markup for two reasons. First, it would still be
nice to know the specific verse number and the verses don't always
start at "1." Second, I am trying
Mats Bengtsson wrote:
Hint: What type of layout object is it that handles your
crescendoText? It's not a TextScript!
Hint #2: there's a list of commonly tweaked layout objects in 5.2 Fixing
overlapping notation.
Cheers,
- Graham
___
lilypond-user
Dear Yota,
I followed the advice of Graham and Seba (shame on me that I did not
find it myself!)
So here is the solution:
%%%
\new Staff psub = \markup{ { \dynamic p } sub. }
{ c'' c'' d''e''_\psub }
}
%%%
best
ole
Am 05.02.2007
Hint: What type of layout object is it that handles your
crescendoText? It's not a TextScript!
/Mats
Roland Goretzki wrote:
Hi at all,
(version 2.10.15)
In the documentation under "8.1.6 Overview of text markup commands" is
written, that the property word-space determines the space betwee
On Feb 5, 2007, at 11:54 PM, Graham Percival wrote:
Alternatively, you could have searched for "dynamics" in the table
of contents and directly found 8.1.8 New dynamic marks.
...or you could have searched the manual with LSR--the first hit for
"new dynamic marks" is the one. :)
Ciao
Ole Schmidt wrote:
is it possible to write something like "poco ff" in another way than
writing \ff_\markup { poco } and than tweaking the "poco" in front of
the "ff" with \override commands?
I can't find something in the manual
You could read 6.6.3 Dynamics:
To create new dynamic marks or t
I use the following trick to print P subito
psubito = #(make-dynamic-script (markup #:hspace 1 #:translate (cons 5 0)
#:line( #:dynamic "p" #:normal-text #:italic "subito" )))
to use it : { c4 \psubito }
following this example, you should be able to build a poco ff (and if you do
please post
Dear all,
is it possible to write something like "poco ff" in another way than
writing \ff_\markup { poco } and than tweaking the "poco" in front of
the "ff" with \override commands?
I can't find something in the manual
Thank you
ole
___
lilyp
Roland Goretzki wrote:
the new feature described in the documentation under "Changes" as:
"Objects that belong outside of the staff are now positioned automatically
to avoid collisions."
You were looking at the changes for the unstable 2.11 branch. All of
those new features are only found in
Hello list, hello Joe,
You wrote:
> On 2/2/07, Roland Goretzki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > [ ... ]
> >In the following I've listed the lower case characters, which show a
> >different behaviour (
> > 1. with "?" they are aligned about .4 or .5 staff spaces
> > too high,
> > 2. with "." t
Hi at all,
(version 2.10.15)
Setting the direction of staccato with "_"
causes wrong positioning in x-direction.
The very small .ly-snippet below demonstrates this.
But I'm not sure, if this is a bug or a feature.
If it were a feature, I would like to get a hint,
how to disable this feature for
Hi at all,
(version 2.10.15)
In the documentation under "8.1.6 Overview of text markup commands" is
written, that the property word-space determines the space between each
markup in args.
This does work properly. :-)
But trying to use it with setting the crescendoText, it doesn't work,
and I ca
Hi list,
the new feature described in the documentation under "Changes" as:
"Objects that belong outside of the staff are now positioned automatically
to avoid collisions."
doesn't work on my machine (debian sarge 3.1), neither with 2.10.14 nor
with 2.10.15.
I copied the source from there and co
I'm wondering if you couldn't avoid this by adding bar lines to the
lyrics context and making them invisible. This _might_ make the lyrics
dodge them automatically (though I make no guarantees). In practice,
I've just left multiple syllable lyrics centered at the end of a
phrase (not the beginning
I think you misunderstood my reply. I didn't say that you
should use text \markup commands, but that you should
use Rehearsal marks, i.e. use the \mark command, just
as you already have done for the "REFRAIN" indication
in your original example.
Also, it's much easier to understand a question if
I hope this isn't too far off topic; maybe Lilypond
could somehow be fit into the thing as a music-printing
engine or something:
from http://www.linux.com/article.pl?sid=07/01/31/1951219
"It would have an iPod running Linux plugged in,
that would allow me to record the music that was
played on i
Mats:
I removed set stanza and used rehearsal marks instead. Here is an
example:
BEFORE:
allWords = \lyricmode
{
\set stanza = "1" \once \override LyricText #'self-alignment-X =
#LEFT \markup{\raise #2.0 \dynamic f The LORD is King; let the}
people tremble;*
\once \override
On 05/02/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/5/07, Mark Knoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 05/02/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 2/5/07, Mark Knoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 05/02/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Any
I had a look on preprocessors... but it's complicated to publish a source
containing such a trick
on the other hand, the learning curve of the scheme functions is tough (a
nice way to say I don't understand a word ^^)
That's why I'm looking for tips :)
I could work from any example of a function
On 2/5/07, Mark Knoop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 05/02/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Anyone know the magic key combination to produce s-underdot in vim?
>
> I've got a multibyte-compiled vim that I use for all sorts of extended
> Unicode, and it works great. But perusing
Hi,
Anyone know the magic key combination to produce s-underdot in vim?
I've got a multibyte-compiled vim that I use for all sorts of extended
Unicode, and it works great. But perusing the table generated by
:digraphs
doesn't turn up any way to produce the lowercase s with underdot (as
is use
On 2/1/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 2/1/07, Joe Neeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2/1/07, Trevor Bača <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > This is cool.
> >
> > So setting line-break-permission = ##f should preclude the value of
> > page-break-permission, right? (I
One solution is to upgrade to the latest development version, where
any text marks, i.e.
\mark \markup{...}
now appear above the chords, in contrast to what you get in version
2.10 and
earlier.
Actually they do not appear above the chords, but above the line of the
chords. So I don't think it
One solution is to upgrade to the latest development version, where
any text marks, i.e.
\mark \markup{...}
now appear above the chords, in contrast to what you get in version 2.10 and
earlier.
See also
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2007-01/msg00734.html
which describes a meth
The easiest solution is probably to use an external preprocessor, like M4
(if you search the mailing list archives you can also find hints on other
similar preprocessors to do purely textual replacements in the file. There,
you can also find comments on why the main authors of LilyPond don't
want
Bonjour,
I'm trying to write a NICE lilypond function to do properly what I could do
with a simple find and replace in the text
where
\pizz
would become :
^\markup {\italic pizz.}
\set Staff.midiInstrument = "pizzicato strings"
I tried some make-markup stuffs but... how to insert a \set proper
Why not use reheasal marks, see the section on "Rehearsal marks" for more
details. As you can see there, you can even get automatic numbering.
It might also be possible to make the stanza number allocate space so it
doesn't collide with the preceding lyrics, but I don't know how to do that.
Yet a
See section "More about stanzas", which shows how to mix ordinary scores
with \markup commands that contain pure text.
/Mats
Paul Harouff wrote:
I want to alternate markup text verses (reader) with scores (choir).
The text verses change from week to week, but the scores remain the same.
Wha
32 matches
Mail list logo
