Hi Trevor!
> This is somewhat arcane - anyone found a better way?
>
> \set Staff.instrument=\markup {
> \override #'(baseline-skip . 0)
> \left-align { \column { \transparent A Solo } }
> }
Here's what I do (I hope I'll remember correctly as I can't find a file
conta
Hi,
Thanks for your suggestions. ChoirStaff sounds like a more sensible
choice, and it explains why lyrics don't try by default to avoid
barlines. All the Romanian scores I've seen so far use top-to-bottom
barlines, and I would have liked to use the same style, but if our
conductor approves :) I'
Hi Mats
Yes, I've read the 2.9 manual, but as I prefer to stick with the stable
releases I shall wait for 2.10 before I try any of the new features.
Incidentally there are some inconsistencies in this section of the 2.9
manual - the text uses the old form (Staff.instrument) and the examples the
I hope you have read the section on Instrument Names in the manual for
version 2.9.
/Mats
Trevor Daniels wrote:
However, you may find the alignment of instrument names across a range of
staves is not what you would like. As I understand it this is because the
instrument name is positioned d
Hi Catalin
Try changing the \new StaffGroup statement to \new ChoirStaff.
This will restrict all the barlines to just the music staves and avoid all
clashes with the lyrics.
Trevor
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Catalin Francu
>
Hi
Try using
\set Staff.instrument = "Soprano Sax"
\set Staff.instr = "s.Sax"
This works in ver 2.8.6
However, you may find the alignment of instrument names across a range of
staves is not what you would like. As I understand it this is because the
instrument name is positioned during indiv
This is a bug that should be corrected in the next release, as far as I
know.
See the mailing list archives of bug-lilypond for more information.
/Mats
Valentin Villenave wrote:
Hello everybody,
I'm not very talented in Lilypond typesetting but -still- I wonder how
comes the same Pianostaff
Hello everybody,
I'm not very talented in Lilypond typesetting but -still- I wonder how
comes the same Pianostaff code can make a "standard" Piano system
Brace :
http://www.mutopiaproject.org/ftp/ChopinFF/O27/chopin-nocturne-8/chopin-nocturne-8-preview.png
or a "small" one :
http://www.lilypon
Which version of LilyPond do you use? The property instrumentName
has been renamed in version 2.9, so if you use version 2.8, you should
read the documentation for that version. (In general, though, I recommend
to read the manual for version 2.9 since it includes many new
clarifications,
but here
On Monday 23 October 2006 12:08, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Mats Bengtsson escreveu:
> > Daniel Tonda wrote:
> >> Just revised the code I proposed and you're right. I wasn't aware that
> >> by using << >> one could remove the \simultaneous. Less typing indeed.
> >
> > Right! \simultaneous{...} is co
10 matches
Mail list logo
