Hi, I'm just wondering if we can use utf-8 to input Chinese (or other Asian)
characters as well?
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user
Hi, I checked the source file
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.7/Documentation/user/lilypond/lily-1721430265.ly
for the tremolo mark, but I don't see any special commands which make them
slanted as by default, the tremolo marks produced by Lilypond 2.7.27 are
perpendicular to the notestem if the note
On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:50:25 +0200, Tapio Tuovila wrote:
> Stephen Corey kirjoitti:
>>
>> Tried Tim's suggestions and he is correct and this does at least seem to
>> be the bulk of the problem. I have read that there are still some issues
>> with java and x86_64 and would prefer to just revert to
Stephen Corey kirjoitti:
>
> Tried Tim's suggestions and he is correct and this does at least seem to
> be the bulk of the problem. I have read that there are still some issues
> with java and x86_64 and would prefer to just revert to jEdit 4.2,
> Lilytool 2.7, and all compatible plugins as I have
Hi.
I'm relatively new to Lilypond. I experimented with it and explored the Fine
Manual quite extensively. I'm qorking now on a Project Gutenberg project,
which means the .pdf output needs to resemble the Original Score as closely
as possible.
I have three questions.
1) Can I hide, from the pdf
Matthias Kilian writes:
> But what about the fonts
We have made a special exception for fonts embedded in documents, see
the file COPYING distributed with LilyPond.
Jan.
--
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | GNU LilyPond - The music typesetter
http://www.xs4all.nl/~jantien | http://
> As for free open source installers, maybe IzPack Java Software
> http://www.izforge.com/ could be used,.
-- begin quote from website --
IzPack is an installers generator for the Java platform. It produces
lightweight installers that can be run on any operating system
_where a Java virtual mach
Vaylor Trucks writes:
> I was not able to (quckly) find this info on the site or in the list
> archives. Suppose I want to use Lilypond to generate output which
> would then be inserted into a book which I intend to sell:
>
> 1. is this a violation of the GNU?
What makes you think that?
> 2. if
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
John Wiedenhoeft wrote:
Hi all,
could anybody please explain how to install LP 2.7.27 on linux? I was
perfectly happy with the autopackage, this shell-script seems not to
work on my system (I tried right click => execute in shell, a shell
opened, but vanished the next
I'm not sure if Sun Java licensing allows include JRE 1.5, but creating
a windows installer with nsis or java installer with something else is
an easy task, so contributions are very welcome.
Bert
___
lilypond-user mailing list
lilypond-user@gnu.org
John Wiedenhoeft wrote:
Hi all,
could anybody please explain how to install LP 2.7.27 on linux? I was
perfectly happy with the autopackage, this shell-script seems not to
work on my system (I tried right click => execute in shell, a shell
opened, but vanished the next moment, and nothig - at lea
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 05:25:41PM -0200, Pedro Kröger wrote:
> > 1. is this a violation of the GNU?
>
> I believe you mean the GPL? no, it's not a violation. You can do
> whatever you want with the output lilypond generates. The license
> applies to the source code of the program itself (i.e. the
Vaylor Trucks wrote:
I was not able to (quckly) find this info on the site or in the list
archives. Suppose I want to use Lilypond to generate output which would
then be inserted into a book which I intend to sell:
1. is this a violation of the GNU?
GNU is a project, you're confusing the GN
"Vaylor Trucks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I was not able to (quckly) find this info on the site or in the list
> archives. Suppose I want to use Lilypond to generate output which
> would then be inserted into a book which I intend to sell:
>
> 1. is this a violation of the GNU?
I believe you
Hi all,
could anybody please explain how to install LP 2.7.27 on linux? I was
perfectly happy with the autopackage, this shell-script seems not to
work on my system (I tried right click => execute in shell, a shell
opened, but vanished the next moment, and nothig - at least not lilypond
- was inst
Hi, I tryed to install lilypond-2.7.27-1.linux.sh but it doesn't work.
Opening the file with vim, I saw that there was an error in line 85: $lilydir
-xzf should be $lilydir -xjf
Another problem is in the file lilypond in ~/bin: the line should end with $*
But I am not able to solve the last pro
Copyright only apply to the work parts of a work originated by
humans. So it is not possible to claim copyrights for mere machine
processing, and no acknowledgment is needed for that. It is though
possible, in part, to restrict the use of a copyright, as long as it
it does not restrict cust
I was not able to (quckly) find this info on the site or in the list
archives. Suppose I want to use Lilypond to generate output which would
then be inserted into a book which I intend to sell:
1. is this a violation of the GNU?
2. if not, what attribution (if any) needs to be present in the f
>
>> AFAIK, no java environment ships with windows, so if you want it to work
>> out-of-the-box, then, yes you would need to include java in the download.
There used to be a Microsoft JVM, but that's history.
>
>There does (or did?) but outdated and stripped (enough that some java
>applets work...
Yes, LilyPondTool requires java 1.5.
However, if there is no sidekick for the stable 4.2 version of jEdit, it's a
major problem, so file a bug for jEdit on www.sf.net/projects/jedit, or
write to the jEdit-user list.
One more thing to add:
the interface for plugins has been radically changed in
I'm using Win XP. I
use 'Notepad++' editor which is more versatile than 'Notepad' and seems
ideal for editing Lilypond programs.
Regards to you all,
Alan
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date:
21 matches
Mail list logo
