Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes If I get the time, I'll code it myself (I want to learn) but what it would need is some way of specifying the fundamental note (eg for a trumpet I would choose concert B flat below middle C), and once you've Try writing a

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Han-Wen Nienhuys > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes > >[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >> > > >> >^ and _ are provided as a shorthand for: > >> > > >> > \override Script #'direction = UP/DOWN > >> > >> My only comment here is that (when using \mar

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Han-Wen Nienhuys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >^ and _ are provided as a shorthand for: > > \override Script #'direction = UP/DOWN My only comment here is that (when using \markup) it does not appear to be a shorthand for *override*. It se

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Han-Wen Nienhuys
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >^ and _ are provided as a shorthand for: > > > > \override Script #'direction = UP/DOWN > > My only comment here is that (when using \markup) it does not appear to > be a shorthand for *override*. It seems to be a shorthand for *specify*. > In other words, an ov

Re: another fingering question

2004-08-23 Thread Anthony W. Youngman
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Jan Nieuwenhuizen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes David Raleigh Arnold writes: -4 4- and 3-4 are all very useful in fingering, and they have been requested and used for years. Why should c_-5 c^5- or c_5-4 remain a problem? You're just trolling, right? Anyway, there's t

Re: automatic piano reduction

2004-08-23 Thread Bertalan Fodor
I've never used \partcombine, but I suppose it could be good: http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Automatic-part-combining.html Bert ___ lilypond-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/li

Re: turn sign with sharp or flat

2004-08-23 Thread Mats Bengtsson
There's actually an even better solution to that problem, see http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.2/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Accidentals.html /Mats Peter B. Steiger wrote: On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 04:46, Mats Bengtsson wrote: I hope you know how to force the natural sign of the next note manually

Re: turn sign with sharp or flat

2004-08-23 Thread Peter B. Steiger
On Mon, 2004-08-23 at 04:46, Mats Bengtsson wrote: > I hope you know how to force the natural sign of the > next note manually: just add an exclamation mark after > the note name! What perfect timing that you mentioned that trick! I have a quartet piece, and on the bass clef the baritone has f#

Re: turn sign with sharp or flat

2004-08-23 Thread Mats Bengtsson
Unfortunately, LilyPond is not clever enough to handle the translation for the moment. I hope you know how to force the natural sign of the next note manually: just add an exclamation mark after the note name! /Mats Frédéric Bron wrote: Dear all, I would like to print a turn sign with a sharp si

automatic piano reduction

2004-08-23 Thread Felix Jaacks
Hello, I am working on a Haendel Aria and already entered the string's notes. There is a piano reduction in the score as well and I wonder wether there is a way to merge the Violins and the Viola to a right hand piano staff. I tried to copy all events of Lilypond's midi output into one track but

Re: grace notes before time signature?

2004-08-23 Thread Erik Sandberg
On Monday 23 August 2004 01.25, Kieren Richard MacMillan wrote: > Erik: > > (ugly, but it should work) > > Yup (to both!)... ;-) > Thanks! > > BTW: is this a known "bug"/"feature", or should I report it? It's a consequence of the way grace note timing currently works. After thinking twice, I foun

Re: Rest position problem

2004-08-23 Thread Mats Bengtsson
This looks like a bug to me. However, why do you use the verticalExtent property instead of the minimumVerticalExtent, as described in http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.3/Documentation/user/out-www/lilypond/Vertical-spacing.html If you change that, it seems that the rests position is correct. /Mats Jef