On Mon, 18 Aug 2003 13:38:19 -0700
Starling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I'm not certain what you mean by this -- could you provide a scanned image
> > of the notation you desire?
>
> http://www.virtualsheetmusic.com/downloads/firstpage/Korsakov/Bumb
Peter,
A little while back I was trying to figure out how to
get lilypond 1.8 on RH9. Make sure that you have read
the following archived message titled "problems trying
out 1.7.29-1 and 30-1" so Han-Wen won't have to repeat
the message.
http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/lilypond-user/2003-08/msg
Okay, I managed to track down the problem. For whatever reason, the
teTeX package does NOT run updmap at all. This is bad, as dvips/ps2pdf
etc use bitmap fonts. That is a BAD thing.
___
Lilypond-user mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnu.org/
If I run the DVI from ly2dvi through dvipdfm, the fonts are correct. The
catch (Of course!) is that the noteheads don't look as good. It
complains about some missing specials, and it wouldn't surprise me in
the least if the two are related.
___
Lilypo
Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so, how does one run lilypond on RH9, without compiling from source? i
have tried to install guile-1.6.4-7.1.i386.rpm (from the rawhide rpm dir
at ftp.redhat.com) which is linked on the lilypond download page, but
the rpm installation routine
On Mon, 2003-08-18 at 17:50, Stefaan Himpe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Your .pdf looks bad on my Debian SID system
> as well. Upon regenerating the .pdf from the source
> using lilypond, it looks perfectly normal on my system.
>
> In addition your .pdf is about 25% larger than the
> one my system generates.
Hi,
Your .pdf looks bad on my Debian SID system
as well. Upon regenerating the .pdf from the source
using lilypond, it looks perfectly normal on my system.
In addition your .pdf is about 25% larger than the
one my system generates. How did you generate the .pdf?
Best regards,
Stefaan
___
Tyler Eaves writes:
> Hi gang - Just reinstall debian on my system (I was flirting with FBSD
> 5.1). Lilypond 1.8.0 (apt-geted from unstable) works great, except that
> pdfs have font weirdness in the heading. Compare the attached dvi and
> pdf. I've attached the ly source as well.
Both look fin
Graham Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 20:33:50 -0700
> Starling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm not certain what you mean by this -- could you provide a scanned image
> of the notation you desire?
No, but I might be able to find something online...
Heh.
http://www.v
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm trying to figure out how to define a \transpose function. What I
> want to do is to put this definition in a file along with clef
> definitions. I want to do this so the piece can quickly be altered for
> different ensembles (i.e. brass choir, trombone choir). I h
Hi gang - Just reinstall debian on my system (I was flirting with FBSD
5.1). Lilypond 1.8.0 (apt-geted from unstable) works great, except that
pdfs have font weirdness in the heading. Compare the attached dvi and
pdf. I've attached the ly source as well.
% Generated automatically by: lilypond-boo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> so, how does one run lilypond on RH9, without compiling from source? i
> have tried to install guile-1.6.4-7.1.i386.rpm (from the rawhide rpm dir
> at ftp.redhat.com) which is linked on the lilypond download page, but
> the rpm installation routine aborts before fini
quoting from an archived post:
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I can confirm that Guile 1.6.0 contains the srfi library and
> works well with Lilypond 1.8. I downloaded the Guile 1.6.0
> tar ball and compiled it myself with the standard configuration,
> so I can't say if RedHat or some
Eric Gebhart writes:
> I tried that as well. I thought it might because
> kpathsea.h lists all it's includes as
Then you'll just have to look in config.log what goes wrong. It's all
there and quite easy to read.
By the way, I expect that you submit your tweaks back into the FreeBSD
ports, so
Normally, line breaks are forbidden when beams cross bar lines. This
behavior can be changed by setting @code{allowBeamBreak}.
Thank you,
the following indeed works like a charm...
\score {
\notes \relative c' {
\property Score.allowBeamBreak = ##t
Btw, are anyone here willing to give me some English language support?
I'm afraid my music terminology in English is rather poor, and since I'm
writing this application I find I need a lot of music words in English
that I just don't know. Anyone willing to help out, let me know.
The music glos
On Wednesday, Aug 13, 2003, at 05:22 Europe/Oslo, Graham Percival wrote:
Being a vi user, I don't know exactly how emacs and Lilypond interact,
but from what I've heard, that's the only thing which does something
similar to what you're trying to do.
Thanks, that gives me at least a place to start
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> > You're aware that you can only break at a barline? So if you need a
> > break where you don't want a written barline, you say something like:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for further helping me. I first read the help on
> Line Breaking in the LilyPond manual, so I am aware
Did you try:
convert-ly -e myfile.ly
If you are lucky, it will automatically convert
all the things that have changes from 1.6.10 to 1.8.
/Mats
Aaron wrote:
Since your files probably contain some additional hacks
in Scheme, it would help if you attached a small example
file that triggers the err
> Since your files probably contain some additional hacks
> in Scheme, it would help if you attached a small example
> file that triggers the error.
my mistake thought I did.
Hre it is
--
> \version "1.6.10" % Thanks, Han-Wen!
% Do you still hav
Since your files probably contain some additional hacks
in Scheme, it would help if you attached a small example
file that triggers the error.
/Mats
Aaron wrote:
Hi all,
I upgraded to Lily 1.8 and ran ly2dvi on my already existing files and
got only error messeges. Must I upgrade my files someh
Nigel Warner writes:
> **) That may be so, but has nothing to do with what /bin/sh is. Python
> uses /bin/sh as interpreter for system commands, and only bash can
> handle redirection to stdout/stderr
>
>> removing the ash shell gives me a bad interpreter error which is odd.
>
> That is prob
22 matches
Mail list logo
